Viewing Thread:
"CaNdYfLo$$ Leaves"

Well I thought it was about time to stick a little post up about it:

Tomorrow is my last day at SR. Some of you will probably breath a sigh of relief at the fact that I won't be able to ban people anymore; some people might miss the fact that I can ;-)

I'm going to work for a company in London on more money with better prospects. Hopefully I'll find time to check back in and say hello and stuff.

So... you'll have to chase the others at SR to get an anti-spam measure in place.

Hrm, now to think of a usertype I can become after leaving.... ideas?

Belldandy wrote:
> Gígž wrote:
> Shut Up.
>
> Make. Me.

Oh its one of these arguements then?

Gígž wrote:
> Mr Snuggly wrote:
> http://image.reserve.co.uk/www/public/images/art/hutson.jpg
>
> Just thought you should all see this, seeing as it's his last day
> an'
> all. He's the one jiving in the middle.
>
> Ha ha! Never would of thought that was CaNYfLo$$!

Gígž wrote:
> Shut Up.

Make. Me.

God, get over it will you? Could both of you please stop bitching and start commenting on how gay Candyfloss looks?

Belldandy wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> You did nothing but spam for 24 hours, Belldandy. And spammed in a
> way
> that is specifically listed in the rules.
>
> 24 hours eh ? Live in some alternate universe where time works
> differently do you ? Because in my time zone IB was banned in less
> than 8 hours from his initial posting, and I then stopped. Notably
> (ha) had IB not commited his crime in the first place I would have
> had no need to post of his guilt. Had he stopped when asked to, there
> would have been no need to post of his guilt. But oh no, he
> continued, undoubtably under the illusion that the excesses of a
> notable would be tolerated.

Shut Up.

Bane wrote:
> I don't believe that even needs commenting on.

I'm with Bane.

Blank wrote:
> You did nothing but spam for 24 hours, Belldandy. And spammed in a way
> that is specifically listed in the rules.

24 hours eh ? Live in some alternate universe where time works differently do you ? Because in my time zone IB was banned in less than 8 hours from his initial posting, and I then stopped. Notably (ha) had IB not commited his crime in the first place I would have had no need to post of his guilt. Had he stopped when asked to, there would have been no need to post of his guilt. But oh no, he continued, undoubtably under the illusion that the excesses of a notable would be tolerated.

I don't believe that even needs commenting on.

Bane wrote:
> Not to mention the mass posting of "IB i s guilty", eh?
>
> Besides, it doesn't take much to realise from your style of
> discussion that banning you would bring about a furious spate of self
> righteous, nonsensical spamming.
>
> Because, quite frankly, that's what you are.

*yawn* Yes sir, banned were you sir ? Oh dear sir. Said you were talking to IB in another post when you were indeed him all alon sir ? Why sir, that's rather weird sir.

You did nothing but spam for 24 hours, Belldandy. And spammed in a way that is specifically listed in the rules.