Viewing Thread:
"CaNdYfLo$$ Leaves"

Well I thought it was about time to stick a little post up about it:

Tomorrow is my last day at SR. Some of you will probably breath a sigh of relief at the fact that I won't be able to ban people anymore; some people might miss the fact that I can ;-)

I'm going to work for a company in London on more money with better prospects. Hopefully I'll find time to check back in and say hello and stuff.

So... you'll have to chase the others at SR to get an anti-spam measure in place.

Hrm, now to think of a usertype I can become after leaving.... ideas?

Belldandy wrote:
> Gígž wrote:
> Done it!
>
> Well done for creating another pointless topic.

Maybe you and I should use it instead then? Eh?

Gígž wrote:
> Done it!

Well done for creating another pointless topic.

Ms NY wrote:
> Make a special topic for your little bitching only, you two. You're
> making the forum look ugly.

Done it!

Always thought Candyfloss's name sounded more like some kind of insane Clown from a horror film, especially with how he did it.

> Mr Snuggly wrote:
> http://image.reserve.co.uk/www/public/images/art/hutson.jpg



Haha.

Blank wrote:
> My post would have made sense if you read it - I was not talking
> about your "IB i s guilty" posts, but your quoting and
> adding nothing of your own. Because unless you haven't noticed,
> nothing in the forum rules says "Do not say 'IB i s
> guilty'".

Maybe you should express yourself more clearly ? 6 posts does not 24 hours make.

Mr Snuggly wrote:
> God, get over it will you? Could both of you please stop bitching and
> start commenting on how gay Candyfloss looks?

Or how gay he sounds, from that name alone.

Make a special topic for your little bitching only, you two. You're making the forum look ugly.

He looks like he's about to launch into a Michael Flatley (that lord of the dance chap) impersonation. Plus the shirt is very "Angel".

Belldandy wrote:
> 24 hours eh ? Live in some alternate universe where time works
> differently do you ? Because in my time zone IB was banned in less
> than 8 hours from his initial posting, and I then stopped. Notably
> (ha) had IB not commited his crime in the first place I would have
> had no need to post of his guilt. Had he stopped when asked to, there
> would have been no need to post of his guilt. But oh no, he
> continued, undoubtably under the illusion that the excesses of a
> notable would be tolerated.

My post would have made sense if you read it - I was not talking about your "IB i s guilty" posts, but your quoting and adding nothing of your own. Because unless you haven't noticed, nothing in the forum rules says "Do not say 'IB i s guilty'".