The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Would you rather have a life with no financial troubles, the money to get what you want and essentially a 'perfect' life, or what you've been given?
I'll start off by saying that, no matter how much I may moan about people being better off than myself, I wouldn't want to change it. We all have our problems, but I like to think that a bit of a struggle in life makes for a more interesting outcome. Getting anything you like without working makes me think it's just a waste of a life. Plus, a disability to see everything you may want to see, or have what you may want to have can change your life; half of things I live for, and I love, may not have been discovered if I chose another path.
So, what would you rather?
>
> Strangely that about crystalises my opinion of you also, except
> you're older so in theory should know better, and have found
> something better to do with your time than arguing with people half
> your age.
Ah, so now we're going for the "your being here is a waste of time" approach? Right...so YOUR being here is of course something quite different, right?
>
> Plus there's the comedy factor everytime you say something along the
> lines of "I once wrote something about this topic and I'll post
> it here" as you proceed to copy and paste a vast essay into the
> topic. I mean, seriously, who keeps written opinions stored on their
> PC ? You'd have to be pretty, well, self important, to do that
> surely...
Or, maybe it's cos I write an email 'zine, and they're articles from it? Just a thought (remember them? You may have had them from time to time)
>
> Still, as I'm continually told by Light et al how inconsequential I
> am, I sure do get a lot of attention.
Yup; all of it telling you what a coward you are. Jesus, you sound like Chris Eubank; "All the abuse they give me shows their respect for me". Bwah ha ha ha haaaa!
>
> As for;
>
> Light wrote:
> Belldandy wouldn't be very visibly the unhappiest virgin in the land.
>
>
> I know this is a long time ago for you Light, but seriously, anyone
> can pull at Uni, even you in your day, probably.
*L* I'd match my record against yours any day. Know why? I've actually had sex. Yes, with a lady and everything.
>
> And, a member of the young conservatives ! What a spiffing youth you
> had....
Sure did! And I learned from it. Have you?
> I pity the girl who proves that 'anyone can pull at uni' with you.
>
> "Call me Mr President! Mr President! Do it you terrorist! I
> am NOT in the wrong hole: I read all about this stuff in Clear and
> Present Danger. Who's the President? Huh? Huh? That wasn't
> premature. The average time is less than 60s. Here's the link!
> Yeah, google me, baby, google me real good."
-----------
Best. Post. Ever.
> I love when people disagree cos it's a chance for debate and therefore a chance to learn something I didn't previously know
But what are you learning from Belldandy? What can you possibly gain from arguing with [quote] "a self-important prissy ignoramus"? I think you should confess that a part of you [the prissy self-important part] loves to argue for arguing sake; loves to put someone down constantly by stomping your seemingly all-knowing boot on their face.You shouldn't be surprised that Belldandy goes on the defensive. It's only natural.
loves to
> put someone down constantly by stomping your seemingly all-knowing
> boot on their face.
Oh please, show me a post where Light has not responded in kind to posturing and know-it-all declerations from Bell.
Go read the Rush Limbaugh post.
Bell waded in and called Light a hypocrite.
I politely explained how Bell had misunderstood the post, and instead of simply saying "Ah yeah, sorry - my bad", he continues to try and prove his (wrong) opinion, even when I explain again, as does Blank. As did 2 or 3 other people.
What happens? Instead of saying "Actually yeah, don't I feel like an ass!", he simply flees to another thread and continues where he feels he doesn't need to admit he made a mistake.
Anyone can make mistakes, I do all the time. But Bell resolutely refuses to consider he ever has.
Which is why he deserves mocking at each and every opportunity.
I have nothing against stupid people, I have everything against arrogant stupid people.
>
> But what are you learning from Belldandy? What can you possibly gain
> from arguing with [quote] "a self-important prissy
> ignoramus"? I think you should confess that a part of you [the
> prissy self-important part] loves to argue for arguing sake; loves to
> put someone down constantly by stomping your seemingly all-knowing
> boot on their face.You shouldn't be surprised that Belldandy goes on
> the defensive. It's only natural.
I'm learning a lot about the fundamentalist mindset from Bell. I'm also learning about the behaviour of a coward. Finally, I've been learning about what makes a neo-conservative type tick; it seems to be the desire not to be proved wrong. That's what I'm learning so far from him.
Uhh...I've already confessed, many MANY times, that I love to argue for the sake of arguing. I've not once denied that.
As to stomping my all knowing boot on their face...well, I disagree with the 'all-knowing'; I've never claimed that, nor would I ever. But the stomping...well, yeah. I've said in several posts that I'm sadistic enough to enjoy a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
However, on a more personal level, people like Bell offend me. Their bullying (yes, I know I'm behaving like a bully toward Bell. But ONLY Bell; I only ever behave like a bullying b*st*rd toward other bully's), self-important, prissy derogation of any and everyone who disagrees with them literally makes my stomach churn with anger. Call it misguided idealism if you like, but I see it as remiss of me not to call people like Bell into question. If I were to leave him be, I'd be letting a bullying little coward think he could get away with his cowardice. Uh-uh.
Finally, I've tried posting to Bell on a more personable level. It worked for a while. Then, the very instant I tried to say something he didn't agree with (as I recall I made an honest observation that his posts came across as arrogant in tone), and he went straight for the whining abuse in retort. Hopefully he'll change, but until then...
> Sometimes it seems you all
> enjoy volleying him just a little too much - but he keeps coming
> back, and deep down, I think you all like when he does.
Probably, yeah. But by the same token, I enjoyed it when he posted like a normal human being for a few weeks. I'm not denying enjoyment at toasting the nappy-wearing retard. But I am saying I enjoy it more when he acts like a reasoned and sentient being, rather than a parrot with self-esteem issues.
> I pity the girl who proves that 'anyone can pull at uni' with you.
>
> "Call me Mr President! Mr President! Do it you terrorist! I
> am NOT in the wrong hole: I read all about this stuff in Clear and
> Present Danger. Who's the President? Huh? Huh? That wasn't
> premature. The average time is less than 60s. Here's the link!
> Yeah, google me, baby, google me real good."
>
> -----------
I vote for Snuggly reinstating GAD for just this one post.