The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[I Posted this in general chat by accident, think it will be better received here as you're all quite politically minded not like the goons who dwell in general chat]
First of all I hate people who blatently contradict themselves. This is brought to life perfectly by the president of the United States of America, mr George Bush.
Now after the tradgedy of September 11th, 2 years ago today, the war on terrorism went into play. Now Iraq were told to own up to any weapons of mass destruction they had because they are, in a nutshell, threatened by them. But hold on, America spend billions of dollars each year making nuclear weaponry and in what cause? Surely it is made to be used if needs be and I am sure that if Iraq were clever enough to make nuclear weapons they know the consequences the detonation of one has on the planet.
In a recent internet poll, George Bush was voted as the second most dangerous man on the planet. Now the people who voted werent phychologists or experts on the subject matter but they must show a degree of fear to vote him as one of the most dangerous men on the planet. I personally do not feel comfortable in the knowledge that he is in control of a bevy of weaponry. I felt just as uncomfortable when I thought the Iraqis had them.
What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else can. Where's the logic in that?
I am sure the more politically minded of you will be offended by my mild understanding of the subject but this is merely the point of view of a regular ordinary guy.
There's only one kind of Bush I like and it isn't George.
First of all I hate people who blatently contradict themselves. This is brought to life perfectly by the president of the United States of America, mr George Bush.
Now after the tradgedy of September 11th, 2 years ago today, the war on terrorism went into play. Now Iraq were told to own up to any weapons of mass destruction they had because they are, in a nutshell, threatened by them. But hold on, America spend billions of dollars each year making nuclear weaponry and in what cause? Surely it is made to be used if needs be and I am sure that if Iraq were clever enough to make nuclear weapons they know the consequences the detonation of one has on the planet.
In a recent internet poll, George Bush was voted as the second most dangerous man on the planet. Now the people who voted werent phychologists or experts on the subject matter but they must show a degree of fear to vote him as one of the most dangerous men on the planet. I personally do not feel comfortable in the knowledge that he is in control of a bevy of weaponry. I felt just as uncomfortable when I thought the Iraqis had them.
What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else can. Where's the logic in that?
I am sure the more politically minded of you will be offended by my mild understanding of the subject but this is merely the point of view of a regular ordinary guy.
There's only one kind of Bush I like and it isn't George.
Page:
They cause more strife than good. They fund coups all over the world and instigate unrest and tension.
Maybe it will bite them in the ass, but what would the world be like if they they just said, "right, i've had enough, sort the world out on your own"!
I think the point being made is...well, put it this way; a century ago, WE were the worlds policemen. And we abused that position for our own benefit. That contributed to 2 world wars, and the end of our empire. The US are now doing exactly the same as we did. And where will it lead? Well...history would indicate that it will lead to interesting times.
I have no objection in principle to ANY 1 nation policing the world. But the US, as the UK did before them, are acting like Harvey Keitel's policeman in Bad Lieutenant. That attitude WILL come back and bite them on the ass.
I have no objection in principle to ANY 1 nation policing the world. But the US, as the UK did before them, are acting like Harvey Keitel's policeman in Bad Lieutenant. That attitude WILL come back and bite them on the ass.
You seem to be having a go at the States trying to police the world. If they don't, who will?
The UN, ha!!!
They didn't want to do anything in Kosovo. There was ethnic clensing over there, but they said, it's not our concern.
The US may have it's faults, but it has only been the world's sole superpower/police force for what, 12 years?
It's a case of if there's a problem, who ya gonna call?
The Dutch?
Think about it.
The UN, ha!!!
They didn't want to do anything in Kosovo. There was ethnic clensing over there, but they said, it's not our concern.
The US may have it's faults, but it has only been the world's sole superpower/police force for what, 12 years?
It's a case of if there's a problem, who ya gonna call?
The Dutch?
Think about it.
[I Posted this in general chat by accident, think it will be better received here as you're all quite politically minded not like the goons who dwell in general chat]
First of all I hate people who blatently contradict themselves. This is brought to life perfectly by the president of the United States of America, mr George Bush.
Now after the tradgedy of September 11th, 2 years ago today, the war on terrorism went into play. Now Iraq were told to own up to any weapons of mass destruction they had because they are, in a nutshell, threatened by them. But hold on, America spend billions of dollars each year making nuclear weaponry and in what cause? Surely it is made to be used if needs be and I am sure that if Iraq were clever enough to make nuclear weapons they know the consequences the detonation of one has on the planet.
In a recent internet poll, George Bush was voted as the second most dangerous man on the planet. Now the people who voted werent phychologists or experts on the subject matter but they must show a degree of fear to vote him as one of the most dangerous men on the planet. I personally do not feel comfortable in the knowledge that he is in control of a bevy of weaponry. I felt just as uncomfortable when I thought the Iraqis had them.
What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else can. Where's the logic in that?
I am sure the more politically minded of you will be offended by my mild understanding of the subject but this is merely the point of view of a regular ordinary guy.
There's only one kind of Bush I like and it isn't George.
First of all I hate people who blatently contradict themselves. This is brought to life perfectly by the president of the United States of America, mr George Bush.
Now after the tradgedy of September 11th, 2 years ago today, the war on terrorism went into play. Now Iraq were told to own up to any weapons of mass destruction they had because they are, in a nutshell, threatened by them. But hold on, America spend billions of dollars each year making nuclear weaponry and in what cause? Surely it is made to be used if needs be and I am sure that if Iraq were clever enough to make nuclear weapons they know the consequences the detonation of one has on the planet.
In a recent internet poll, George Bush was voted as the second most dangerous man on the planet. Now the people who voted werent phychologists or experts on the subject matter but they must show a degree of fear to vote him as one of the most dangerous men on the planet. I personally do not feel comfortable in the knowledge that he is in control of a bevy of weaponry. I felt just as uncomfortable when I thought the Iraqis had them.
What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else can. Where's the logic in that?
I am sure the more politically minded of you will be offended by my mild understanding of the subject but this is merely the point of view of a regular ordinary guy.
There's only one kind of Bush I like and it isn't George.
Page: