The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
sparked off by lord kugai (, nobish, kumquat, etc.) who says he has an IQ of 131 and use this as a base to every "insult" he gave out. some people take IQ ratings highly and some disregard. i know that my IQ is well above average, but i dont use it to say im smarter than everyone else. i just wanted to know roughly what the intelligence of the forums are...
i have an IQ of 131 (and, no im not related to kugai)
*note:
1)you are at your peak at around about 22-25.
2)90-100 is an average IQ
3)different ages, have different marking systems. (ie. 120 at 24 will be say 10 questions correct, where as for a 60 year old it will be 8 questions right.
i have an IQ of 131 (and, no im not related to kugai)
*note:
1)you are at your peak at around about 22-25.
2)90-100 is an average IQ
3)different ages, have different marking systems. (ie. 120 at 24 will be say 10 questions correct, where as for a 60 year old it will be 8 questions right.
Page:
according to that online BBC IQ test I got me a score of 120.
is that good or bad?
is that good or bad?
Clazon wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> Ashley wrote:
> average is 90-110.........
>
> No, average is 100. Stands to reason.
>
> no... because that would mean 2 things
>
> if someone got 99, you would percieve them as below average.
Which they are. Because the average IS 100 whether you like it or not. Whether you're trying to be kind to someone who is only just below average or not.
> youre drawing a big dividing line and so falling into the trap that
> tests are absolute.
A dividing line? That's what the average does. The average is the middle. I'm not falling into any trap thinking that they are absolute, and I kind of hinted at that by saying "IQ tests are meaningless".
> Blank wrote:
> Ashley wrote:
> average is 90-110.........
>
> No, average is 100. Stands to reason.
>
> no... because that would mean 2 things
>
> if someone got 99, you would percieve them as below average.
Which they are. Because the average IS 100 whether you like it or not. Whether you're trying to be kind to someone who is only just below average or not.
> youre drawing a big dividing line and so falling into the trap that
> tests are absolute.
A dividing line? That's what the average does. The average is the middle. I'm not falling into any trap thinking that they are absolute, and I kind of hinted at that by saying "IQ tests are meaningless".
*snorts*
Clazon? An IQ of 131? Someone's be telling very large porkies.
Clazon? An IQ of 131? Someone's be telling very large porkies.
yep, but im starting to doubt your mental status.
sorry about the "beer" you drank. rover has a bladder control problem...
sorry about the "beer" you drank. rover has a bladder control problem...
Clazon wrote:
>
> you *stiffed* me with the bill. thats just not right.
>
> ... and no, not all men have that problem and it does matter.
Yes. The use of a duck was a bad idea. I do have a duck fetish problem but it's all under control now...
Have the surgeons managed to remove all the feathers yet?
>
> you *stiffed* me with the bill. thats just not right.
>
> ... and no, not all men have that problem and it does matter.
Yes. The use of a duck was a bad idea. I do have a duck fetish problem but it's all under control now...
Have the surgeons managed to remove all the feathers yet?
Goatboy wrote:
> Ah, the montly "IQ Internet Test"
> And the monthly "you do realise that online IQ tests are as
> valid as online pregnancy tests" comment.
Not true. I did an online pregnancy test that predicted I was pregnant with twins. Then a mircale happened. I went to the loo and produced two of the healthiest babies you'll ever see.
I had trouble weighing them at first but someone suggested leaving them on the window to dry out. This worked a treat. I then went to hospital to get the umbilical that was hanging between my legs cut off.
Sadly though when I got back both my lads had passed on, they were sweet princes of this world but they never really had a chance.
> Ah, the montly "IQ Internet Test"
> And the monthly "you do realise that online IQ tests are as
> valid as online pregnancy tests" comment.
Not true. I did an online pregnancy test that predicted I was pregnant with twins. Then a mircale happened. I went to the loo and produced two of the healthiest babies you'll ever see.
I had trouble weighing them at first but someone suggested leaving them on the window to dry out. This worked a treat. I then went to hospital to get the umbilical that was hanging between my legs cut off.
Sadly though when I got back both my lads had passed on, they were sweet princes of this world but they never really had a chance.
Hedfix wrote:
> Clazon wrote:
> mr smith
>
> :D *hedfix knows what i mean.
>
> Yes and that's the last time I go to a hotel with YOU.
>
> *Goes off in a huff*
you *stiffed* me with the bill. thats just not right.
... and no, not all men have that problem and it does matter.
> Clazon wrote:
> mr smith
>
> :D *hedfix knows what i mean.
>
> Yes and that's the last time I go to a hotel with YOU.
>
> *Goes off in a huff*
you *stiffed* me with the bill. thats just not right.
... and no, not all men have that problem and it does matter.
From the MENSA website
"1 in 50 people have an IQ in the top 2%"
well duh!
made me laugh
"1 in 50 people have an IQ in the top 2%"
well duh!
made me laugh
Clazon wrote:
> mr smith
>
> :D *hedfix knows what i mean.
Yes and that's the last time I go to a hotel with YOU.
*Goes off in a huff*
> mr smith
>
> :D *hedfix knows what i mean.
Yes and that's the last time I go to a hotel with YOU.
*Goes off in a huff*
http://www.intelligencetest.com/
A different IQ test, I got 131. These tests give you vastly different scores. :S
A different IQ test, I got 131. These tests give you vastly different scores. :S
Page: