The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Thats right vote for me.
*points too sheep*
Vote me.
*points too sheep*
Vote me.
Page:
Blank wrote:
> It's such a waste of grammar when Ethiopian children have none at
> all.
Isn't that statement meant to be used for food...?
They don't have anything, do they.
Pah.
> It's such a waste of grammar when Ethiopian children have none at
> all.
Isn't that statement meant to be used for food...?
They don't have anything, do they.
Pah.
I started to count the number of mistakes in Robin's post, but I was losing count due to the frequency. I think it's somewhere in the region of 25, but there are no doubt a lot that I missed.
It's such a waste of grammar when Ethiopian children have none at all.
It's such a waste of grammar when Ethiopian children have none at all.
Lindgren wrote:
> We're not voting on people's spelling abilities.
No, we're voting on a person's steady and consitent input to the forums throughout. And hence, such like this quality within Robin is sincerely inadequate, mostly due to inefficient grammar and spelling capabilities, he doesn't deserve a vote.
> We're not voting on people's spelling abilities.
No, we're voting on a person's steady and consitent input to the forums throughout. And hence, such like this quality within Robin is sincerely inadequate, mostly due to inefficient grammar and spelling capabilities, he doesn't deserve a vote.
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> If i could be bother and read everyones posts, word by word, and
> every little bit of grammer, i would be sitting here for a while
...
, i
> just skip read, therfor i don't both looking at the grammer.
...
> And, AND, you have a go at me for my grammer skills, just because it
> is me.
...
> Anyways i recon i could beat you in a spelling contest any way, but i
> do not feel the need to prove myself to some common yob on the
> internet.
...
> If i could be bother and read everyones posts, word by word, and
> every little bit of grammer, i would be sitting here for a while
...
, i
> just skip read, therfor i don't both looking at the grammer.
...
> And, AND, you have a go at me for my grammer skills, just because it
> is me.
...
> Anyways i recon i could beat you in a spelling contest any way, but i
> do not feel the need to prove myself to some common yob on the
> internet.
...
Robin, we can all open a dictionary.
The point of your last post seemed to be "I can spell and have good grammar", and yet contained one of the highest spelling errors:post length ratio I've seen this year. At least be consistent, you fool.
The point of your last post seemed to be "I can spell and have good grammar", and yet contained one of the highest spelling errors:post length ratio I've seen this year. At least be consistent, you fool.
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> grammer
> grammer
Indeed you are a fool memo.
I just do not feel the need to use my best grammer skills on a poxy forum, what is the point?.
Memo if my grammer skills bother you that much, then just don't vote for me, or a better idea, sodd of and find another forum.
If i could be bother and read everyones posts, word by word, and every little bit of grammer, i would be sitting here for a while, i just skip read, therfor i don't both looking at the grammer.
Unlike you, "Oh mummy look that bad boy missed out a question mark"
I could quite easily comment on some of your grammer skills, if i were to look at some of your posts over the last week.
And, AND, you have a go at me for my grammer skills, just because it is me. If it was someone like Lindgren, or Hedfix, you just wouldn't bother, you just like to have a pop at me at every opertunity because, well let's face it you must just be sad.
Anyways i recon i could beat you in a spelling contest any way, but i do not feel the need to prove myself to some common yob on the internet.
I just do not feel the need to use my best grammer skills on a poxy forum, what is the point?.
Memo if my grammer skills bother you that much, then just don't vote for me, or a better idea, sodd of and find another forum.
If i could be bother and read everyones posts, word by word, and every little bit of grammer, i would be sitting here for a while, i just skip read, therfor i don't both looking at the grammer.
Unlike you, "Oh mummy look that bad boy missed out a question mark"
I could quite easily comment on some of your grammer skills, if i were to look at some of your posts over the last week.
And, AND, you have a go at me for my grammer skills, just because it is me. If it was someone like Lindgren, or Hedfix, you just wouldn't bother, you just like to have a pop at me at every opertunity because, well let's face it you must just be sad.
Anyways i recon i could beat you in a spelling contest any way, but i do not feel the need to prove myself to some common yob on the internet.
Generally people as grammatically inadequate as Robin can't discuss things at length, so don't contribute anything worthy of a gold name.
That and the fact Robin posts nothing but rubbish anyway.
That and the fact Robin posts nothing but rubbish anyway.
Blank wrote:
> He can't even spell a two letter word, and thinks he deserves a vote.
> Ha. Ha.
We're not voting on people's spelling abilities.
> He can't even spell a two letter word, and thinks he deserves a vote.
> Ha. Ha.
We're not voting on people's spelling abilities.
HA.
Page: