Viewing Thread:
"NOTABLE EVICTION"

Just an idea. But how about every 3 months we eliminate a notable who really is

1) Not here very much
2) Not posting well

Having been here for almost 100 days I can say who I've seen and not seen in the time I've been here (apologies if you have been here and I say you haven't, I just didn't notice you):

FantasyMeister - Who?
Grix Thraves - Seen a fair bit of
Meka_Dragon - Seen a few posts
Sniper - Seen a few posts
Ant - Yup he's here a lot
er-no - Here a lot
SHEEPY - Here a lot
pb - Seen a fair bit of
Wookiee Monster - Unless he's now wookie man then it a 'who?'
Goatboy - Rings a bell ;)
RastaBillySkank - Has been around
Your Honour - Seen about 10 posts.
Pro Evo - Who?
SonicRav - Who?
Edgy - Here a lot
AfroJoe - Here a lot
Rosalind - Becamea notable then all but disappeared


So should we round it down to 15 notables then?


VOTING:

Everyone gets 2 votes this time round. And you must put the reasons why you voted for them.

I also propose in the future we vote to get rid of a notable when we make a new one.

Anyone who wants to lose their wee colour can campaign if they want.

He always has wanted to be a notable. :)

Kyz wrote:
> None of them deserve demotion as they have been valued forums members
> at some time of other to acheive their status and because they dont
> post for a while doesnt mean they should lose that status.

Harharharfathar
Kyz wants to be notable.

MJswerve wrote:
> This idea should be burnt, what gives you the right to suggest that
> people should have a status THEY earnt removed?

Like I said. Time for a re-shuffle lets have some notables who are actually relevant to SR now.
Fine, perhaps they

>
> So what if they dont find the forums appealing anymore, perhaps they
> just cant be bothered spending time here?

So it's time for some new notables who can be bothered and do find the forums appealing.

Its not their duty to hold
> the fort and make sure its interesting, thats what every single
> member should try and do.

Yeah but most notable posts are good examples of good posts. They were voted in is it too much to expect them to set an example every so often?

> They
> all deserved it, perhaps now they arent notable worthy, but when they
> were voted they were and people should recognise that.
>

I do. Now some aren't "notable worthy" as you put it. It's time to clear out the dead wood and vote in some people who are actually relevant to SR as it is now.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> Given that I don't even appear on the notable list any more, I can
> only assume I'm up for the chop anyway.

Whoops, sorry! Back up now, in the upper echelon where your sort belong.

I vote for Nash.
BURN THE REDS
BURN THE REDS

All the notables are great, except boatboy, he is a slagggg.

None of them deserve demotion as they have been valued forums members at some time of other to acheive their status and because they dont post for a while doesnt mean they should lose that status.

Icarus wrote:
> Until they're so birght you can't see them anymore?

Or so bright you fly into them and crash and burn? :P

Why not just make me 'Supreme Overlord' and give me total control.

You know you want to.

SR, maybe we could do a notable election once a year or twice a year, so it's a much more important event.

Yeah, that's a new idea.