The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Nothing stops me from buying them - No spotty tvvat at the counter, No standerds agency. No-one.
So it begs the question - Do BBFC ratings actually mean anything? Yes I know ratings were put there to show the customer what is in the film and what they can expect. But, Why can I buy these films underage? Should'nt I be stopped and taken to the police?
Do BBFC ratings need to be scrapped all together?
> The ratings have all gone mad anyway.
>
> Terminator should have been a 15.
and the original matrix should have been a 12.
> Also they require
> credit or debit card payments, most card types won't be issued to
> under 18's.
Natwest gives out Solo cards for people who are 11+
HSBC - 16+
Solo = debit card.
:\
If you use a parents card to buy online, with or without their knowledge, then theoretically they've broken the law by knowingly buying age rated material to show to someone under that age. Unlikely anyone will ever actually be prosecuted for that, but you never know.
America may not have BBFC ratings, but it does have stringent laws anyway - several states now have made it a felony for any store to sell violent videogames to minors, and all retailers are enforcing it strictly. A challenge to it was shot down in flames by a US court, don't be surprised if rating systems get stricter rather than laxer in the future....
Terminator should have been a 15.
Can you remember the first time you watched an 18 rated film? I probably saw my first 18 movie when I was 11 if not younger than that. I think it was Predator. Okay so you can't go and buy/rent an 18 but you can still watch it from a mates copy or off tv.
In a video shop lately I saw this mother with her 11/12 year old son and he was just picking 18 movies off the shelf and his mother didn't seem to care at all. They were even discussing what they had heard about the movies before going up and paying for them.
That 12A rating came in after Spiderman. All these parents complaining that they wouldn't be able to take their kids to see the movie even if they knew that their kids could handle the themes in the movie. I think the Spiderman movie should have been a PG there wasn't anything really bad in it anyway. Let the parents decide. They really should do a 15A as well.
Should there be some sort of system introduced to stop this?
Obviously, it's difficult to prove the 15 rating - unless the kids are actually 10 or below, but except for a passport, there's not much ID an under 16 year old can get.
However, if the parents are around, as long as they hand over the cash, it doens't matter. It's up to the parents if they want to let their kids watch stuff classed as too old for them.
I work in Debenhams, and I don't let any snotty nosed teen buy anything if I suspect them of being under the BBFC age for the product. IF they ain't got ID, they're not getting it. Especially if they have one of these 'com' on, I'm ard, innit' attitudes where I take great pleasure in saying, "No ID, no Game/DVD/Video".
> Actually, it's illegal to sell to underage kids.
> True story
Thankyou.