Viewing Thread:
"What does it take to be a Moderator?"

I know there are already little specifications to become a moderator on the site, but lets here from the frontline troops. Any things that are cool about being a moderator, and what you think it takes to become one?

Antichris wrote:
> Whoa i'm confused now. Can you be a moderator without actually
> having moderator under your name? Because i've noticed that the
> 'regular' status can be different colours. Like pb has moderator
> under his name in light blue, Hmmm has 'regular' in light blue,
> but machie has regular in purple. Little help here? :D


User types

To add to that page - if you are a moderator of a different forum than the one you post in then people see the colour but not the moderator wording.




Search Freeola Chat My Freeola Instant Site

Odd.....

I do not know much about the working of the forum to be honest, Butch may know why, he seems the top (forum) dog.

I imagine it has something to do with the thread creator, or type, and what exact access you have on each "section". :S

Whoa i'm confused now. Can you be a moderator without actually having moderator under your name? Because i've noticed that the 'regular' status can be different colours. Like pb has moderator under his name in light blue, Hmmm has 'regular' in light blue, but machie has regular in purple. Little help here? :D

pb wrote:
> A non-staff mod is just allowed to edit and delete posts (not
> whole threads though) and sticky posts to the top of the forum.


As a moderator I notice sometimes I can:
Delete Post | Make Thread Sticky

And sometimes I can:
Bar User | Edit Post | Make Thread Sticky


Anyone know why the functionality seems to change?





Search Freeola Chat

Oh no. Classic mistake. You forgot Butch himself!!
Ha ha

(and Timmie)

Warhunt wrote:
> :0 No staffies in that post....I sense a shortage of GADS for
> Chris :D

Uh-ohhhh. I forgot to say i made an extra list. These are the people i REALLLY REALLY like: motomoto, Warhunt and all the other staff at Freeola. Their wit is unmatched xD

motomoto wrote:
> pb wrote:
>
> That said, I have my suspicions that some of the staff never
> leave this site for a second... :D
>
> We're always watching... It just takes a while to come up with
> witty responses...

....unlike this response

pb wrote:

> That said, I have my suspicions that some of the staff never
> leave this site for a second... :D

We're always watching... It just takes a while to come up with witty responses...

:0 No staffies in that post....I sense a shortage of GADS for Chris :D

Well i am sure i speak on behalf of most members when i say;

We are glad to have new users come along who contribute GAD worthy posts and are happy to be part of the site and give a good input to the site!

But i have to agree with that list of names you put as being some pretty good people lol