Viewing Thread:
"LotR related argument"

It's just a simple "Which is better?" argument between me & a equally beardy mate, but help settle it none the less.

Which is better, Fellowship or Towers?

I say Fellowship, he says Towers.

It's just a simple "Which is better?" argument between me & a equally beardy mate, but help settle it none the less.

Which is better, Fellowship or Towers?

I say Fellowship, he says Towers.

Fellowship

Fellowship.
Towers had Golum.

Fellowship.

Unless you like lots of battles, then Towers.

But Fellowship is just betterer

Although Towers has Ents, which rule.

But Fellowship because ... something.

Fellowship.

Both are great but I'd go for Towers for the great battle.

Fellowship has Sean Bean, though.

Fellowship - Towers was more battles and setting up for the final part, Fellowship introduces the different races, establishes settings, history etc and had a more awe inspiring feeling to it. Tower's battle's were excellent, but I prefer the first one.

flowers?

Fellowship, Towers was a bit too broken up with all the jumping between characters.


It also had a few rubbish scenes with Aragorn & Co running for 30 seconds, then Legolas stops; shouts something obscure and they run again.

Excellent, I've decided that I'm right. I reckon Return will be better than Towers, but not as good as Fellowship. You'll have to go some to better the Fellowship Extended Version - practically as perfect as a film can be.