Viewing Thread:
"RAW Thread"

I've made a RAW thread which is basically for discussing what happens on RAW. Every week just talk about what happened on RAW, I never actually see that much talk about each show so I've decided to make this thread. Whatever you do PLEASE don't put any spoilers in or if you really have to do it after Friday Night.

I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.

Cong_Man wrote:

> Did it? I thought it said 'Batista Pinches Infants'. Which would have
> been weirder.

not nearly as funny though.
part of me finds the mental image of batista punching a small dhild very funny indeed... all those miles of vein exploding from his forehead :)
>
> Edit: V_M :-O! You've got a warning. Have you been bad?

yeah :S
woke up in a foul one today and used the dreaded c- word in a post.
i also posted ironically the LEAST funny thing i've ever written in a "what's the funniest thing ever?" thread, i was subsequently (and understandably) breated by Gerrid and Xenophon.

i really, REALLY Need more things to occupy me until uni picks up again :S

Very_Metal wrote:
> In the Batista vs Orton match.
>
> sign reads: "Batista punches infants"

Did it? I thought it said 'Batista Pinches Infants'. Which would have been weirder.

Edit: V_M :-O! You've got a warning. Have you been bad?

In the Batista vs Orton match.

sign reads: "Batista punches infants"

.. well, it made me laugh :D

Oh it's intelligent to concentrate on other markets but he shouldn't need to, it's his stupidity regarding the US market that is causing his company to do so badly

It's actually an intelligent business move from Vince. The UK for example have been crying out for proper WWE shows to be held over here for years and as a result any WWE show will sell out any arena over here, no matter how bad the current feuds/storylines/gimmicks/roster are.

Until the novelty wears off that is.

hehe wouldn't put it past him really, all the while saying the reason the WWE is performing craply is because it's still in the 'low trend' it always goes in occasionally

Speaking of doing poorly noticed how the WWE is now switching RAW to different countries. What's the matter Vince we Americans decided that your show is crap and not watching it anymore so you've decided to concentrate on other markets you haven't given a crap about before but now decided they're very important?

Oh and where the hell did Shane-O-Mac spring from :-D

Kawada wrote:
> I'm guessing by the end of 2006 he'll have held it at least 20 times

What's the betting that when he does get to the point of having held it more times than Flair, he'll go on a long title run of about three years, so he can say he had a long reign as well.

I'm guessing by the end of 2006 he'll have held it at least 20 times

Lipe wrote:
> Kawada wrote:
> Ah well i was right - reward enough :-D
>
> I know...look, I'm only going to say this once but...
>
> HHH is sort of, only a tiny bit, annoying me now. He has had the
> title for too long...

And whne he loses it, it's inevitable that he'll get it straight back, making it look like (maybe because it's true) he only drops the belt to regain it and up the number of times he can say he's held it.

Kawada wrote:
> Ah well i was right - reward enough :-D

I know...look, I'm only going to say this once but...

HHH is sort of, only a tiny bit, annoying me now. He has had the title for too long...