Viewing Thread:
"RAW Thread"

I've made a RAW thread which is basically for discussing what happens on RAW. Every week just talk about what happened on RAW, I never actually see that much talk about each show so I've decided to make this thread. Whatever you do PLEASE don't put any spoilers in or if you really have to do it after Friday Night.

I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.

Kawada wrote:
> Because he is another useless steroid abusing botch monkey which Vince
> brought in just because Brock was a success and so hired a bunch of
> wasters in his likeness. Although Brock was actually talented and
> could put on a good match the rest haven't been which includes
> Batista.

I was waiting for that final sentence. Well done. :P

And I was surprised at the continuity on Raw this week, when Angle mentioned the Summerslam 2000 love triangle with Stephanie!

That was awesome, it was heel vs heel and it worked really well.

I have the luxury of the fast forward button on PPV's as i tape those.

Plus it doesn't matter if i flick over. WWE's continuity barely stretches to a month let alone 6

I just find it better to watch the whole show, because 6-months down the line if Benjamin has a feud with Batista you wont know much about Batistas history or whatever so you cant really weigh up the match. I am one of those people who doesnt like switching channels half way through a programme. If i watch a programme i watch the whole thing. I just find it annoying to keep switching channels. I think that there is enough good people in the WWE to carry some of the crappier segments, such as tonights Lita/Edge wedding. Although i know it wil be rubbish i will still watch it so that i know what is going on.

Do you switch over on PPVs as well, or do you watch the matches with Batista etc?

Kawada wrote:
> I watch the parts i know i'll like (e.g Christian, Angle, Benjamin)
> and then flick over when the crap comes on like Batista and HHH

Gotta say i agree completely with this, Batista and HHH is so dull to watch these days cause its the same week in week out, Batista needs a new storyline after Hell in a Cell because he is actually half decent sometimes, Batista is so over that he is made to look almost invincible, really Angle could beat Batista in about 15-20 mins, he's a better champ than HHH though...

The Wardy wrote:
> Yeah, but i am glad my standards are lower because otherwise i might
> spend my whole life complaining about WWE like you do!

Hmmm didn't realise a few minutes each day voicing my opinions on a website suddenly turns into my whole life. I'll be damned


> Why do you watch it if you hate it so much?

I watch the parts i know i'll like (e.g Christian, Angle, Benjamin) and then flick over when the crap comes on like Batista and HHH

Yeah, but i am glad my standards are lower because otherwise i might spend my whole life complaining about WWE like you do!

Why do you watch it if you hate it so much?

Because he is another useless steroid abusing botch monkey which Vince brought in just because Brock was a success and so hired a bunch of wasters in his likeness. Although Brock was actually talented and could put on a good match the rest haven't been which includes Batista.

And for me he hasn't had what i'd call a decent match but then my standards are obviously a darn sight higher than yours.

Why is it you hate Batista so much? I think his matches are good, the only thing i dont like are his mic skills or lack of mic skills. He does seem to gabble sometimes and muck the words up, but apart from that i think he has decent matches.

I've not seen any of them

Batista has had decent matches