The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've made a RAW thread which is basically for discussing what happens on RAW. Every week just talk about what happened on RAW, I never actually see that much talk about each show so I've decided to make this thread. Whatever you do PLEASE don't put any spoilers in or if you really have to do it after Friday Night.
I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.
I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.
Page:
Lipe wrote:
> Lol, 1 week? It ain't that good.
I'm no big fan of CGJ, but believe me, it is.
> Lol, 1 week? It ain't that good.
I'm no big fan of CGJ, but believe me, it is.
Don't ever EVER talk about wrestling like that!
Lol, 1 week? It ain't that good.
Lipe wrote:
> Dunno, I ain't watched RAW for weeks. The builders near my house have
> messed up the satellites so until they go I have no sky sports :(
I can't go without wrestling for more than a week! God bless Sky Sports!
> Dunno, I ain't watched RAW for weeks. The builders near my house have
> messed up the satellites so until they go I have no sky sports :(
I can't go without wrestling for more than a week! God bless Sky Sports!
Fígó wrote:
> I see your point Tazz, I know someone who also hates seeing moves such
> as the Rolling Thunder or Lionsault and thinking 'he simply just
> rolls off him, that would never hurt'. I myself like Cruiserweight
> matches if they are fast paced. For instance, the Cruiserweight tag
> match on Smackdown last week i did not enjoy, where as others like
> Grandprix did.
>
> I prefer RAW to Smackdown, simply because it has the charismatic guys
> and has much more interesting feuds.
I appreciate the fact that you understand my opinion. That is a very valuable quality. Don't take it for granted.
> I see your point Tazz, I know someone who also hates seeing moves such
> as the Rolling Thunder or Lionsault and thinking 'he simply just
> rolls off him, that would never hurt'. I myself like Cruiserweight
> matches if they are fast paced. For instance, the Cruiserweight tag
> match on Smackdown last week i did not enjoy, where as others like
> Grandprix did.
>
> I prefer RAW to Smackdown, simply because it has the charismatic guys
> and has much more interesting feuds.
I appreciate the fact that you understand my opinion. That is a very valuable quality. Don't take it for granted.
Yeah, I hate builders.
Dunno, I ain't watched RAW for weeks. The builders near my house have messed up the satellites so until they go I have no sky sports :(
On raw do you think the wwe is making chris jericho a face again?
AfroJoe wrote:
> He's actually been around since 1997,
that make it worse it 6 years rather than 3
> probably more to do with the fact that he's one of the bulkiest guys
> in the company.
He didn't look as 'bulky' three years ago as he does now, one too many Big Macs one assumes?
> He's actually been around since 1997,
that make it worse it 6 years rather than 3
> probably more to do with the fact that he's one of the bulkiest guys
> in the company.
He didn't look as 'bulky' three years ago as he does now, one too many Big Macs one assumes?
I see your point Tazz, I know someone who also hates seeing moves such as the Rolling Thunder or Lionsault and thinking 'he simply just rolls off him, that would never hurt'. I myself like Cruiserweight matches if they are fast paced. For instance, the Cruiserweight tag match on Smackdown last week i did not enjoy, where as others like Grandprix did.
I prefer RAW to Smackdown, simply because it has the charismatic guys and has much more interesting feuds.
I prefer RAW to Smackdown, simply because it has the charismatic guys and has much more interesting feuds.
Page: