The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Or cannibis, weed, etc etc.
Let's all discuss it.
Because i want to see if any of you have ever encountered it.
There is also a reason that this is here and not FOG, so mature, adult answers please, no little kiddies pretending to be cool.
Let's all discuss it.
Because i want to see if any of you have ever encountered it.
There is also a reason that this is here and not FOG, so mature, adult answers please, no little kiddies pretending to be cool.
Page:
Twiddly wrote:
> Why is weed so popular? Because people always want what they can't
> have.
I don't believe that what you said is always the case. Cannabis can relax and calm you, I've known people who were clinically depressed, to the point of suicide and cannabis was the only thing that could calm them down. Of course, some people have it for the reason you stated, and in general it's a VERY true statement, but I think it's unfair to tie all cannabis smokers with the same brush. Also cannabis can be used for medicinal purposes, but I think it's mixed in with food, rather than smoked.
> Why is weed so popular? Because people always want what they can't
> have.
I don't believe that what you said is always the case. Cannabis can relax and calm you, I've known people who were clinically depressed, to the point of suicide and cannabis was the only thing that could calm them down. Of course, some people have it for the reason you stated, and in general it's a VERY true statement, but I think it's unfair to tie all cannabis smokers with the same brush. Also cannabis can be used for medicinal purposes, but I think it's mixed in with food, rather than smoked.
Goatboy wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Im sure Goatboy was refering to how little sense his sentence made,
> as
> if he was insane.
> ---
>
> Yep, but you forget Mr Dandy has had a humourectomy.
I don't find much humour in what you write, that's the problem.
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Im sure Goatboy was refering to how little sense his sentence made,
> as
> if he was insane.
> ---
>
> Yep, but you forget Mr Dandy has had a humourectomy.
I don't find much humour in what you write, that's the problem.
Blank wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> He'll always be Belldandy. Or, as I like to call him, Veiny Bangrod.
>
> Catchy.
Ha ! See Blank, what I said in the other topic was not groundless accusation after all, groupie :P
> Goatboy wrote:
> He'll always be Belldandy. Or, as I like to call him, Veiny Bangrod.
>
> Catchy.
Ha ! See Blank, what I said in the other topic was not groundless accusation after all, groupie :P
I noticed that whilst typing it actually.
We're all childish.
We're all childish.
Asher D wrote:
> On a related note, my Dad likes to fiddle around with my stuff when he
> comes round,
I know its childish but that made me snigger :D
> On a related note, my Dad likes to fiddle around with my stuff when he
> comes round,
I know its childish but that made me snigger :D
Mr Snuggly wrote:
. I'm reminded of that song off The
> Streets album where this argument is put to music, quite effectively
> too.
On a related note, my Dad likes to fiddle around with my stuff when he comes round, and he discovered this album. He likes that song.
Which makes me feel like a loser every time I play it and remember the words or say to myslef that I like the song.
. I'm reminded of that song off The
> Streets album where this argument is put to music, quite effectively
> too.
On a related note, my Dad likes to fiddle around with my stuff when he comes round, and he discovered this album. He likes that song.
Which makes me feel like a loser every time I play it and remember the words or say to myslef that I like the song.
Blank wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> He'll always be Belldandy. Or, as I like to call him, Veiny Bangrod.
>
> Catchy.
Ever fancy going into Porn..that would the name of the year
*not that I have EVER watched it* good girl me O:)
> Goatboy wrote:
> He'll always be Belldandy. Or, as I like to call him, Veiny Bangrod.
>
> Catchy.
Ever fancy going into Porn..that would the name of the year
*not that I have EVER watched it* good girl me O:)
Twiddly wrote:
> You don't get "lager breaks" at work. You do, however, get
> "cigarette breaks". And I'm fairly confident that given the
> misdirected advertising weed has been given, plenty of people will use
> their cigarette breaks to ensure they can "think more deeply, and
> approach issues from a different perspective".
errr, as far as I'm aware of, cigarettes do not impair your judgement in any way, or change your perception, or anything like that. all cigs do is give you a brief 'kick' in the same way coffee does. you wouldn't be able to have a joint in your cig break as :
a) people would know because of the smell
b) people would know because of the general appearance of you
failing that, if companies were so paranoid, they could have random drug tests, just like they already do, and ban the use of marijuana for all employees.
problem solved.
being intoxicated can span to all sorts of areas. you can come in work in the morning still steaming from the night before. you are still unfit to work even though you are not drinking there. if someone is unfit to work it will show, and they should be sent home, or punished if the job entails something that could put peoples lives at risk.
> You don't get "lager breaks" at work. You do, however, get
> "cigarette breaks". And I'm fairly confident that given the
> misdirected advertising weed has been given, plenty of people will use
> their cigarette breaks to ensure they can "think more deeply, and
> approach issues from a different perspective".
errr, as far as I'm aware of, cigarettes do not impair your judgement in any way, or change your perception, or anything like that. all cigs do is give you a brief 'kick' in the same way coffee does. you wouldn't be able to have a joint in your cig break as :
a) people would know because of the smell
b) people would know because of the general appearance of you
failing that, if companies were so paranoid, they could have random drug tests, just like they already do, and ban the use of marijuana for all employees.
problem solved.
being intoxicated can span to all sorts of areas. you can come in work in the morning still steaming from the night before. you are still unfit to work even though you are not drinking there. if someone is unfit to work it will show, and they should be sent home, or punished if the job entails something that could put peoples lives at risk.
Goatboy wrote:
> He'll always be Belldandy. Or, as I like to call him, Veiny Bangrod.
Catchy.
> He'll always be Belldandy. Or, as I like to call him, Veiny Bangrod.
Catchy.
Twiddly wrote:
> You don't get "lager breaks" at work.
No but you do get "tea breaks", so why isn't everyone smashing open crates of Stella? Because it's against employer regulations, as would smoking pot.
Besides, look at Holland. They have sever problems with people going
> on to use harder drugs, either as a logical next step, or because
> there is no excitement in smoking weed if it's legal.
Where is your evidence of this please?
> Legalise weed, use of class a drugs will skyrocket.
I haven't said legalise it.
I said the point you raised was nonsense.
> You don't get "lager breaks" at work.
No but you do get "tea breaks", so why isn't everyone smashing open crates of Stella? Because it's against employer regulations, as would smoking pot.
Besides, look at Holland. They have sever problems with people going
> on to use harder drugs, either as a logical next step, or because
> there is no excitement in smoking weed if it's legal.
Where is your evidence of this please?
> Legalise weed, use of class a drugs will skyrocket.
I haven't said legalise it.
I said the point you raised was nonsense.
Page: