Viewing Thread:
"Why the hell are third world countries still starving while David Beckham is getting 100k + a week?"

David Beckham is about as thick a two turds mixed with a bucket of thick ice cream ,so why the hell does he get 100k + a week? He can kick a ball into a net... Not exactly a lifesaver is he? I like football but 100k ,thats just ridiculous. Isn't it strange the way the people who do the least work get all the money , while Firemen ,who put their life on the line every day ,are still not being paid enough. I hope Britain becomes a third world country so that we can all see how much we waste our money on some guy with ever changing crappy hair styles. If anyone can come up with a genuinely good answer i'd like to hear it. And if you can't , post something anyway...

oh yeah that 100k is for his football ,not all his media and fashion crap...

Memorandum wrote:
> Even though phi11ip has a perfectly valid point...

Nah :)

Silver Merc wrote:
> What do you mean by that?

I'm a sheep! ;)

phi11ip wrote:
> As much as you won't believe it. David Becham does do far more work
> than you'd expect. A 9-5 job would be far easier than what he has to
> do.
>
> Every day. Running, pushing your body to the limit, aching, repeating
> set procedures over and over and over again.
>
> It's not just a case of turn up to the game and play and go home and
> rest on your £100k. It's an incredibly hard lifestyle.
>
> And if you want more money to firemen, why don't you give your money
> to the firemen. Most people here contribute to one footballers wages
> some way or another, why don't you stop people funding footballers and
> get them to fund more money into public services.
>
> A poor comparism for you to try and make.

I don't fund footballers. So poo to you :P

Kyz22 wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
>
> I feel like there's a VERY select bunch of people on this planet
> that
> actually have sense, myself being one of them and some people on
> here,
> such as yourself.
>
>
> *proud*

And so you should be! :D

I agree with Black Glove, not about him being a "great" footballer (because I think he is very good, but not great. I do however agree with some of what he said.

How do you know he is thick? Have you spent enough “quality time” with him?

Just because he has a high-ish voice, which sounds a little funny with his accent doesn’t make him thick. So why call him thick all the time, Because Graham Norton says so?

It may have been vaguely amusing when it first appeared in The Sun, but it has gotten a little old now.

Not at all.
I'd say the same thing about any great footballer who was called thick.

Black Glove = fanboy

AlcoholicArmadillo99 wrote:
> David Beckham is about as thick a two turds mixed with a bucket of
> thick ice cream

At a very young age he had the presence of mind to seize his opportunities with both hands and make himself successful.
At a very young age he had the presence of mind to practice and perfect his strongest attributes and make himself outstanding.
At a very young age he had a powerful will-to-win and wasn't daunted or deterred by his critics.
At a very young age he had a quickness of thought and a sureness of touch - mid the hustle-and-bustle of the 90minutes he had VISION.
At a very young age he proved to be a loving father and was seen by many as a perfect role model.

Intelligence can express itself in many ways - it's much much more than just your IQ rating or how many academic qualifications you have.
I'd think twice in the future before you condemn someone as being "thick".

Kyz22 wrote:
> Hey dude - hows things?

Hi, sorry I didn't reply. I had to leave on short notice. if your still here, post me.

I wouldn't pay him to clean my boots. And i have dirty boots.