Viewing Thread:
"A verbal assault on IB...."

...does not reside here, It seems doubtful that I would win, but it would have been fun to try, oh well.....

Maybe another time I shall attack him, for one reason or another, just to see some of his outrageous rantings as he frantically tries to win the argument, or I could just make some kind of verbal attack for no reason at all, I don't know, it was just an idea I had floating around in my head.

1) I answered your question perfectly. I came to the conclusion that you are stupid because you have trouble keeping up with words that you should know from the later years of primary school.

But if you're referring to the question that you posed as to whether or not I'm retarded, I can say with absolute confidence that I am not.

I have not pointed to my intellig"a"nce as a defence. However, it must be pointed out that your lack thereof is something of a weakpoint on your half.

2) You go on to say "you're smart/clever" but not intelligent. Please tell me how you i)make the distinction and ii) know me so well as to be able to accurately conclude such?

If you want a battle of wits, I'm very willing to provide, but given that you've already pointed to the fact that you have trouble understanding the english language, you can't really expect to win, can you?

Insane Bartender wrote:
> How about the fact that 99.9% of the words I use were taught to
> everyone who ever bothered to turn up at school.
>
> Mong.

So your so called intelligance is your only defence?

You do realise that you are smart/clever...

...You are not intelligant.

And you didn't answer my question, you just avoided it, like a coward.

How about the fact that 99.9% of the words I use were taught to everyone who ever bothered to turn up at school.

Mong.

Insane Bartender wrote:

> So, you're saying that you can't understand what I type because you're
> stupid?
>
> At least you have the guts to admit that.

My god, you are actually retarded?

How the hell can you come to that conclusion from what I said?

Seriously, how? If you can actually give me a decent answer to that then well done to you Mr B.I.G.

After a weekend away from the forums, it's nice the see the incessant arguments still raging like an inferno.
It's rather like meeting up with an old mate you haven't seen in a few months.

:P

Insane Bartender wrote:
> The very idea that you people think about me this much is more than a
> little disturbing.

a classic case of to the wall

>
> My intellect, such as it is, is a cherished gift, and not a weapon. If
> I use big words like "peon" and "fool" to bewilder
> people, the bewilderment is there because they are stupid, and not
> because I am smart.

hehe

>
> Now, I'm going to leave you pathetic maggots to argue the toss over
> what makes me more arrogant and undermining; my "intellect"
> which is appreantly composed of my repertoire of supposedly large
> words that contain fewer than seven letters, or my simple ability to
> truthfully deny the idea that any of you mean anything to me.

argue the toss? I'm going to leave you pathetic maggots to wriggle in your own toss sounds funnyer :D

badgermaniac wrote:
> Yes, and your over use of the dictionary shines through.


So, you're saying that you can't understand what I type because you're stupid?

At least you have the guts to admit that.

*sigh*

I'm not even going to wast emy time on this one.

badgermaniac wrote:
> Whitestripes wrote:
>
> Boy
>
> hah.

Ignore prior statement. Instead...

Yes I am. :D

Whitestripes wrote:

> Boy

hah.