The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'The Outfit'.
The Outfit:
[URL]http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/648/648782p1.html[/URL]
Destructable Environments.
Destruction on Demand.
Its Mercenaries but in WWII.
*Drools*
[URL]http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/648/648782p1.html[/URL]
Destructable Environments.
Destruction on Demand.
Its Mercenaries but in WWII.
*Drools*
Page:
Comedy Nazis!
Now there was an odd moment in televisual decency.
Now there was an odd moment in televisual decency.
"I was just p!ssing by...."
Genius. Nail on head there MM.
Genius. Nail on head there MM.
Your Honour wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> Close tags 'mr programmer'.
>
> And after the notable vote you tried to tell me you only liked to
> have discussions with intelligent people, and you thought most on
> here were below you?
>
> *snigger*
Whilst trying to bring an interesting debate back on track? Why yes I did say that. I think I also said that if you give me an idiot I feel compelled to take the mick.
And there was no 'trying' about it: I told you.
> Hedfix wrote:
> Close tags 'mr programmer'.
>
> And after the notable vote you tried to tell me you only liked to
> have discussions with intelligent people, and you thought most on
> here were below you?
>
> *snigger*
Whilst trying to bring an interesting debate back on track? Why yes I did say that. I think I also said that if you give me an idiot I feel compelled to take the mick.
And there was no 'trying' about it: I told you.
I'm going to try and complete the final levels of Brothers in Arms, and i'll let you lot carry on arguing.
This is one argument I can't find any neutral ground in as you are all being ass-tards.
Cheerio.
This is one argument I can't find any neutral ground in as you are all being ass-tards.
Cheerio.
Your Honour wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> Fly off the handle if you must because you tried to claim 'all wars
> are bad'.
>
>
> I'm lost Hedfix. Are you trying to say all wars are good?
>
> I can't quite see the point you're trying to make....
Well I guess you'll have to read back a little further then won't you?
> Hedfix wrote:
> Fly off the handle if you must because you tried to claim 'all wars
> are bad'.
>
>
> I'm lost Hedfix. Are you trying to say all wars are good?
>
> I can't quite see the point you're trying to make....
Well I guess you'll have to read back a little further then won't you?
Yep, spot on.
At the moment it's not a cash cow or bandwagon jumping as far as I'm aware.
I didn't say in the first place I was objected to all war games period. I just feel it's a step into franchise gaming which doesn't need to be made.
Football fine for franchising and milking. Fat plumber who gets a lift from magic mushrooms, ripe for milking.
I can't really see a disconnection between the increasing number of war games by American publishers and the current climate of Americans bombing anyone they don't like.
At the moment it's not a cash cow or bandwagon jumping as far as I'm aware.
I didn't say in the first place I was objected to all war games period. I just feel it's a step into franchise gaming which doesn't need to be made.
Football fine for franchising and milking. Fat plumber who gets a lift from magic mushrooms, ripe for milking.
I can't really see a disconnection between the increasing number of war games by American publishers and the current climate of Americans bombing anyone they don't like.
Hedfix wrote:
> Whilst trying to bring an interesting debate back on track? Why yes I
> did say that. I think I also said that if you give me an idiot I feel
> compelled to take the mick.
>
> And there was no 'trying' about it: I told you.
Well you really brought this dicussion back on track with that "mr programmer" comment didn't you? No childish school ground comments from you, no siree.
Well done. I take my hat off to you.
> Whilst trying to bring an interesting debate back on track? Why yes I
> did say that. I think I also said that if you give me an idiot I feel
> compelled to take the mick.
>
> And there was no 'trying' about it: I told you.
Well you really brought this dicussion back on track with that "mr programmer" comment didn't you? No childish school ground comments from you, no siree.
Well done. I take my hat off to you.
Goatboy wrote:
> Comedy Nazis!
> Now there was an odd moment in televisual decency.
It's one of my favourite shows, and dead cheap on Play too.
> Comedy Nazis!
> Now there was an odd moment in televisual decency.
It's one of my favourite shows, and dead cheap on Play too.
Bonus wrote:
>
> I can't really see a disconnection between the increasing number of
> war games by American publishers and the current climate of Americans
> bombing anyone they don't like.
Shame they've been on the PC for years then.
>
> I can't really see a disconnection between the increasing number of
> war games by American publishers and the current climate of Americans
> bombing anyone they don't like.
Shame they've been on the PC for years then.
Hedfix wrote:
> Well I guess you'll have to read back a little further then won't
> you?
I have done. The only point you've made is that you like WW2 games. Apart from that you've just tried to rip Bonus to shreds.
> Well I guess you'll have to read back a little further then won't
> you?
I have done. The only point you've made is that you like WW2 games. Apart from that you've just tried to rip Bonus to shreds.
Page: