Viewing Thread:
"Why I post here and not in chat"

Because a topic starts with questioning the physics of a yoghurt pot, then goes into Blue Peter dogs dying and living in the sky with Jesus. We then have Terry Nutkins being terrified by a furious orangutan in zero-gravity, which turned into the outline for a show called "Monkey Punch" in which various wildlife presenters battle with simians and ended with "Vet Club", an underground monkey-fighting club.

And in chat?
"Xbox suk donkee cok"

Tie a knot in your suspenders folks, the show the new Simpsons episode wish they were, Family Guy, has the second season heading onto R2 DVD this week. Although the R1 version has commentary and all that jazz whereas we get subtitles and scene selection.

Ars...

And while you're here BEARDS and Snuggly, can you possibly reconsider some of the blocks on this filter? I'm sure even the most sheltered of children can stand a few ars's here and there.

That didn't sound right.

Grix Thraves wrote:
> Nope.

You should. On all counts.
Genius.
Especially Another Day, if I remember correctly.

gerrid wrote:
> Grix Thraves wrote:
> I'll put Battle Royale on.
>
> Do yo uhave the full unedited version?
> And have you seen 'Ring', or 'Another Day'?

Nope.

Grix Thraves wrote:
> I'll put Battle Royale on.

Do yo uhave the full unedited version?
And have you seen 'Ring', or 'Another Day'?

Grix Thraves wrote:
>
> I'll put Battle Royale on.

I can never seem to find a copy of Battle Royale. Unless, of course, I don't have the money to buy it.

gerrid wrote:
>
> Trying to hide your geeky waze.

Why would I want to hide them? I've just never seen the total amount of code that is necessary to make Windows XP **** me off.

The people in this forum make me rather happy indeed.

But I want to watch a film and can't decide.

It's between Blues Brothers, Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid, and Battle Royale.

Mmmmm...

I'll put Battle Royale on.

BEARDS. wrote:
> But, but, it's not code efficient. Or so I've been told anyway.

Trying to hide your geeky waze.

The sagacious one wrote:
> Following that logic this thread will end up on a riveting discussion
> on Direct X, application programming and why XP is so code efficient.

But, but, it's not code efficient. Or so I've been told anyway.

This forum makes me laugh a lot