The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I know i have asked this a lot but i that is only because i respect your opinions. After the release of my last site which is located:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk
A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables. SO...
I did. Check it out tell me what you think. If you do not like the colour scheme or anything else i can change with the .css file then tell me what you think would make it look better and i will check it out! SO here it is:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk/sports/index.htm
Please criticise!
AJ
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk
A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables. SO...
I did. Check it out tell me what you think. If you do not like the colour scheme or anything else i can change with the .css file then tell me what you think would make it look better and i will check it out! SO here it is:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk/sports/index.htm
Please criticise!
AJ
Page:
Er what happened to that site I thought was a template? Seems your standards dropped again...
Not so smart now then r ya
cheeseman wrote:
> unknown kernel wrote:
> This site really doesn't work in Mozilla 1.2.1. You should download
> Mozilla from www.mozilla.org and test the site on both browsers.
>
> Are you sure that it is compatible with CSS?
Mozilla 1.2.1 is 100% CSS3 compliant iirc.
> unknown kernel wrote:
> This site really doesn't work in Mozilla 1.2.1. You should download
> Mozilla from www.mozilla.org and test the site on both browsers.
>
> Are you sure that it is compatible with CSS?
Mozilla 1.2.1 is 100% CSS3 compliant iirc.
Tyla wrote:
> cheeseman wrote:
> A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables.
> SO...
> I did.
>
> No you didn't, your still using tables? You kind of missed the whole
> point of using CSS for layout...
He did though didnt he? It seems too me he only used table for what their supposed to be used for structure!
> cheeseman wrote:
> A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables.
> SO...
> I did.
>
> No you didn't, your still using tables? You kind of missed the whole
> point of using CSS for layout...
He did though didnt he? It seems too me he only used table for what their supposed to be used for structure!
cheeseman wrote:
> A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables.
> SO...
> I did.
No you didn't, your still using tables? You kind of missed the whole point of using CSS for layout...
> A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables.
> SO...
> I did.
No you didn't, your still using tables? You kind of missed the whole point of using CSS for layout...
I suggest you get rid of the scrolling text, and try to make the banner look less blocky.
unknown kernel wrote:
> This site really doesn't work in Mozilla 1.2.1. You should download
> Mozilla from www.mozilla.org and test the site on both browsers.
Are you sure that it is compatible with CSS?
> This site really doesn't work in Mozilla 1.2.1. You should download
> Mozilla from www.mozilla.org and test the site on both browsers.
Are you sure that it is compatible with CSS?
Aqua is the best colour for the backgrounds of the tables so keep those as they used to be, get rid of the yellow highlighting as it's crap!
Blue boreders and title bit background and the sub-titles can be Aqua...
Just fiddle with the background and find a colour that doesn't clash..
Blue boreders and title bit background and the sub-titles can be Aqua...
Just fiddle with the background and find a colour that doesn't clash..
This site really doesn't work in Mozilla 1.2.1. You should download Mozilla from www.mozilla.org and test the site on both browsers.
Ive made it so the person can change what the background color it is as i can not decide!
Page: