The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I know i have asked this a lot but i that is only because i respect your opinions. After the release of my last site which is located:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk
A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables. SO...
I did. Check it out tell me what you think. If you do not like the colour scheme or anything else i can change with the .css file then tell me what you think would make it look better and i will check it out! SO here it is:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk/sports/index.htm
Please criticise!
AJ
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk
A lot of you suggested that i use CSS for layout instead of tables. SO...
I did. Check it out tell me what you think. If you do not like the colour scheme or anything else i can change with the .css file then tell me what you think would make it look better and i will check it out! SO here it is:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk/sports/index.htm
Please criticise!
AJ
Page:
I only used the table for the proper reasons on the second one the:
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk/sports/index.htm one but the first one
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk one i admit i used tables incorrectly!
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk/sports/index.htm one but the first one
http://www.james483.fsnet.co.uk one i admit i used tables incorrectly!
Tables were intended to layout content clearer in the days when the largest webpage around was the HOWTO on setting up sendmail. They were not intended to be the staple construct of massive pages containing all sorts of inline elements. Because, you see, IE won't render a table until it reaches the tag. I'm sure you can see how this would cause problems.
Thats exactly what i used tables for!
cheeseman wrote:
> What were tables supposed to be used for then?
For setting out data (like a List of items, or a Table of High Scores, or links) ... not the whole Web Site.
> What were tables supposed to be used for then?
For setting out data (like a List of items, or a Table of High Scores, or links) ... not the whole Web Site.
Just ignore him, he's very sour about tables...
Don't mention the F word to him though or he'll get very angry...
Fr*****ge
Don't mention the F word to him though or he'll get very angry...
Fr*****ge
What were tables supposed to be used for then?
Tyla wrote:
> Oh dear... you still have so much to learn. Tables were never intended
> to be used for layout and sructure!
You earn the 'one finger salute!'
My site would be dead without 'the table!'
:c)
> Oh dear... you still have so much to learn. Tables were never intended
> to be used for layout and sructure!
You earn the 'one finger salute!'
My site would be dead without 'the table!'
:c)
Alexj17 wrote:
> He did though didnt he? It seems too me he only used table for what
> their supposed to be used for structure!
Oh dear... you still have so much to learn. Tables were never intended to be used for layout and sructure!
> He did though didnt he? It seems too me he only used table for what
> their supposed to be used for structure!
Oh dear... you still have so much to learn. Tables were never intended to be used for layout and sructure!
cheeseman wrote:
> What are you on about?
http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php? threadid=62560&forumid=206
> What are you on about?
http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php? threadid=62560&forumid=206
MJswerve wrote:
> Er what happened to that site I thought was a template? Seems your
> standards dropped again...
What are you on about?
> Er what happened to that site I thought was a template? Seems your
> standards dropped again...
What are you on about?
Page: