The "Xbox Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.fairplay-campaign.co.uk/
I cannot afford a game every month, like i say im not exaclty loaded at this current moment in time.
If nobody bought a game from the 1st to the 8th of December, there would just be huge sales on the 9th of December. Fact is people are still going to buy the games they wanted, whether it's a week later or not.
All I said was, the GameCube was the cheapest console on the market (because Nintendo can, not necessarily because they have to), and so are the games. So as far as I know, Nintendo are pricing games fairly.
If there is a price drop, then I won't say no. But the point I'm getting across is that Nintendo are a very hard working company, who's primary objective is to make great games (and good money), so I will not be boycotting them.
If it was just EA, on the other hand...
Games are way to much money i think at the moment, £40-£45 is quite alot of cash to shell out for one Xbox game. Im not exactly the richest guy in the world, i can only roughly afford 1 game every 2-3 months and thats in theoretical terms!
I am getting a paper round soon which is earning me £60-£70 a month, yes I will then be able to afford at least 1 game a month, but if the price was reduced to roughly £20 i would be able to buy the games i want on release!
Like Sav said Nitendo are'nt customer hugging hippies.....
Nintendo almost owned the market after the Nes and Snes.
But, they got complacent, treated third parties badly, marketed their console badly, and lost their market leader place as a result.
This time round, they have been by far the best when it comes to prices.
Although they are selling the cheapest, they have the smallest losses because they designed the console to be cheap to manufacture, while MS have blown a fortune selotaping the most expensive parts around into a big black box (hence they're making a HUGE loss on sales...).
Anyway, at the moment, Xbox games are generally £5 more than Gamecube games.
But that matters little.
Both companies are ripping us off when it compares to their American prices.
And THAT is what Fairplay is all about.
Like Microsoft and Sony, they have a business mind and they lost a lot of ground to Sony in recent years. If the GC is to be successful, they have to make it cheaper than the other 2 because the console itself has less features so it needs to make itself more attractive in other ways - hence the lower pricing.
Nintendo aren't regarded as the be all and end all of videogames - unless a kid asks for a specific console, a parent will look at all 3 as having games to keep the kids busy and will then want to know which is better. If a GC is the same price as an X-Box or PS2, why would they shell out the cash for a GC when they can buy a console that plays DVD's, etc ?
At the end of the day, Nintendo put the low price tags out because to compete, they have to. I certainly don't remember Nintendo caring about us too much price wise in the consoles before the GC while it was still pretty dominant.
The N64 was the one that really brought them down, not just because of Sony doing things very well, but Nintendo just priced themselves out of sales.
All fairplay want to do is to make the prices more or less the same on both sides of the Atlantic, to make it fair, or so to speak.