The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
America have an annoying President, and a very big army.
England have an annoying Prime Minister and a very big army.
Iraq have some very dangerous weapons.
They seem even enough for this to escalate to much more.
If it's a war, I have 14 serious illnesses, I'm allergic to Clothing and I'm a very tall 4-year old.
England have an annoying Prime Minister and a very big army.
Iraq have some very dangerous weapons.
They seem even enough for this to escalate to much more.
If it's a war, I have 14 serious illnesses, I'm allergic to Clothing and I'm a very tall 4-year old.
Page:
Mr. Happy wrote:
> Hold it there, soldier, that's "pre-emptive self-defence"?
> Surely that's the same as "unprovoked attack".
So you aren't in the least bit concerned about what would happen if he develops nukes?
I admit Iraq is a difficult situation, but how would you handle it?
> Hold it there, soldier, that's "pre-emptive self-defence"?
> Surely that's the same as "unprovoked attack".
So you aren't in the least bit concerned about what would happen if he develops nukes?
I admit Iraq is a difficult situation, but how would you handle it?
Goatboy wrote:
> But suggesting that those who wish for an alternative for more murder,
And what exactly do you expect to get if Saddam is just left to go about his business?
He's already got chemical and biological weapons. He's already tried to buy equipment for nuclear weapons. Part of the 'Super Gun' he was trying to build when we last went in is now in the Imperial War Museum. And you would just let him carry on?
It's all very well wishing for alternatives, but people like Saddam aren't in the habit of giving any. He's lied for years, and defied international regulations designed to help prevent war. He's been allowed to get away with it for 12 years. Should we wait another 10 until he actually has the capability and pops a nuke off at someone?
> not only offensive but ill-thought out and juvenile.
No more so than thinking that if we ignore it for long enough it'll just go away.
I'm all for alternatives, as I have no wish to see our troops being killed, either by bullets or chemicals. But for all the people against military action, few are providing any viable alternatives - just "ooh, let's just wait and see."
> But suggesting that those who wish for an alternative for more murder,
And what exactly do you expect to get if Saddam is just left to go about his business?
He's already got chemical and biological weapons. He's already tried to buy equipment for nuclear weapons. Part of the 'Super Gun' he was trying to build when we last went in is now in the Imperial War Museum. And you would just let him carry on?
It's all very well wishing for alternatives, but people like Saddam aren't in the habit of giving any. He's lied for years, and defied international regulations designed to help prevent war. He's been allowed to get away with it for 12 years. Should we wait another 10 until he actually has the capability and pops a nuke off at someone?
> not only offensive but ill-thought out and juvenile.
No more so than thinking that if we ignore it for long enough it'll just go away.
I'm all for alternatives, as I have no wish to see our troops being killed, either by bullets or chemicals. But for all the people against military action, few are providing any viable alternatives - just "ooh, let's just wait and see."
I'd hope not, but like I said it's nonse of my business.
You think we're like this all the time?
That's true.
And it's none of my business, but jesus...you must have good times though?
And it's none of my business, but jesus...you must have good times though?
Goatboy wrote:
> Are you two really having squabbles in public, or is this an amusing
> character-based comedy routine for our amusement?
You should know I don't do anything for your amusement.
> Are you two really having squabbles in public, or is this an amusing
> character-based comedy routine for our amusement?
You should know I don't do anything for your amusement.
Are you two really having squabbles in public, or is this an amusing character-based comedy routine for our amusement?
It's like Liam & Noel, but with less eyebrow
It's like Liam & Noel, but with less eyebrow
Ingenium Bartender wrote:
> My friend Graham occupies the 2nd bedroom. So unless I want to sleep
> with him, I end up sleeping on the couch.
I feel pretty sorry for Graham
> My friend Graham occupies the 2nd bedroom. So unless I want to sleep
> with him, I end up sleeping on the couch.
I feel pretty sorry for Graham
Rosalind wrote:
> Your lucky I have to share a one-bedroom flat with my boyfriend, so I
> can't get away from him, and even when I'm really really mad at him I
> still have to share a bed with him :(
My friend Graham occupies the 2nd bedroom. So unless I want to sleep with him, I end up sleeping on the couch.
> Your lucky I have to share a one-bedroom flat with my boyfriend, so I
> can't get away from him, and even when I'm really really mad at him I
> still have to share a bed with him :(
My friend Graham occupies the 2nd bedroom. So unless I want to sleep with him, I end up sleeping on the couch.
Ingenium Bartender wrote:
> I have a two bed flat dedicated to such a cause.
Your lucky I have to share a one-bedroom flat with my boyfriend, so I can't get away from him, and even when I'm really really mad at him I still have to share a bed with him :(
> I have a two bed flat dedicated to such a cause.
Your lucky I have to share a one-bedroom flat with my boyfriend, so I can't get away from him, and even when I'm really really mad at him I still have to share a bed with him :(
Page: