The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
......Stand up and be counted boy, i think you owe DW an apology.
I don't think you realise what he's been through.
You should know better.
I don't think you realise what he's been through.
You should know better.
Page:
Pointless Babble wrote:
> Flanders wrote:
> Oh my - Look everyone - Pointless Babble's ranting and arguing with
> people, Nothing much changes there then.
>
> Actually, DW and Quint stopped arguing with me a fair while back, it's
> just clowns like you and Ant walking in and looking for trouble now.
> Pay attention. ;)
>
> Just one question PB - If you really think that you are so superior
> to
> all these teenagers that you are arguing with here then why don't
> you
> just leave. Is it some kind of power / ego trip for you to think you
> can outsmart kids ?
>
> Foolish boy, again, pay attention.
> It states quite clearly in my previous replies that you and the others
> like yourself are a minority, the decent posters outnumber idiots such
> as yourselves, and I enjoy chatting with them. It's not so much a case
> of outsmarting them, as making sure they know their role in life. ;)
*scoffs* For a start, Flanders is older than you, and certainly more capable of having civilised conversation with peoples younger than himself.
Role in life? Yes, and I suppose your's is to be an absolute git.
>
> Ant wrote:
> I certainly don't look like it? How the hell would you know
>
> By reading your psots. ;)
Psots? I thought you were supposed to be smart.
> ...ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
> That reply of yours, by the way, is a perfect example of "how the
> hell I know". ;)
What stupid question might that be?
>
> For all you know I could be some 40-year-old paedophile
>
> Another fine example of the above. ;)
Not really, I was just pointing out that you wouldn't actually know if I were a 40-year-old paedophile. And don't talk crap about how my posts prove to you that I'm not.
>
> What a load of tripe. "Slurred English," what's that
> supposed to mean?
>
> Ahh, so you have difficulty reading as well as writing?
> Quite a simple concept, read it carefully a few times, think about it
> a little - you'll eventually figure it out.
I don't think you quite get what I was trying to say. I know what slurred English is, it's just I don't speak it. Take it from someone with more GAD prizes than you can ever imagine.
>
> Probably just one of your many smart-***e comments.
>
> No, no, boy. Smart-***e comments is the kind of thing you attempt, I'm
> merely replying, but apparently you seem to have difficulty
> understanding English.
Your repetitive comments about my understanding of English are becoming tiresome now, I'll just point out what I wrote above about my 18 Gameaday prizes which certainly isn't the easiest thing in the world to do if you don't understand English.
Thought of any new 'insults' yet?
>
> I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but you're worse than
> Stryke.
>
> *Yawns*
>
> Take a look at the replies to this topic whilst I was still arguing
> with DW, you see them? Ok, good... now, notice that the majority say
> "Babble is right"? ;)
>
> These people can read, these people noticed the fact I'd pointed out a
> few topics, these people read those topics and as such knew what they
> were talking about. You're not one of these people, because you're
> blathering on for the sake of blathering on, and know boIIocks all
> about the topic in question.
Actually, I came in here and the DW topic just joking around, talking about irrelevant phrases such as "insolence personified." I knew DW would stay, he just can't resist my charms. ;)
> Do wake me if you ever manage to catch up with the rest of us. )
I think I'd prefer you asleep to be quite perfectly honest.
> Ant wrote:
> I didn't contradict myself. You're right, I don't believe in
> Evolution, I believe in Creation. Doesn't mean I'm contradicting
> myself though.
>
> Yes it does. ;)
> You mock a belief founded on SOME scientific fact, to later state you
> subscribe to one based upon ZERO scientific fact... that, boy, is
> called a contradiction. Also makes you look damn stupid. ;)
I wasn't mocking, just joking around. Although apparently you don't know what that constitutes, so I suppose I'll have to go into further detail. I know that evolution, evolutionary process or whatever is accepted all the way around the World and I can accept that. People such as Goatboy can testify to that, as on many an occasion I have taken part in civilised religious debates with him, and in the end we've just come to the conclusion that he believes in Evolution/Big Bang, and I believe in Creation.
And I don't need scientific fact to know that God exists (although it has been proven many times over that Jesus existed, and they've found thousands of artefacts), because I have a relationship with him. As does Flanders. Mock us if you will, but we have more proof of God existing than you could ever have in Evolution. But that's up to you obviously, I'll just do my best to try and help people see what I've seen.
> Come on children, whats wrong? Even with your horde of pygmy-minded
> buddies you can't concoct a half-decent retort between the lot of
> you?
This brings me to another point...if we 'pygmy-minded, mud-slinging' kids, teenagers and adults if you include Flanders, are so unintelligent and boring, why do you continue to reply to our retorts? And judging by the ease I have managed to burn down your latest argument with, I don't think it's us who's concocting the less than half-decent retorts.
*Ant takes a deep breath, and goes to chat to people with opinions that actually matter*
> Flanders wrote:
> Oh my - Look everyone - Pointless Babble's ranting and arguing with
> people, Nothing much changes there then.
>
> Actually, DW and Quint stopped arguing with me a fair while back, it's
> just clowns like you and Ant walking in and looking for trouble now.
> Pay attention. ;)
>
> Just one question PB - If you really think that you are so superior
> to
> all these teenagers that you are arguing with here then why don't
> you
> just leave. Is it some kind of power / ego trip for you to think you
> can outsmart kids ?
>
> Foolish boy, again, pay attention.
> It states quite clearly in my previous replies that you and the others
> like yourself are a minority, the decent posters outnumber idiots such
> as yourselves, and I enjoy chatting with them. It's not so much a case
> of outsmarting them, as making sure they know their role in life. ;)
*scoffs* For a start, Flanders is older than you, and certainly more capable of having civilised conversation with peoples younger than himself.
Role in life? Yes, and I suppose your's is to be an absolute git.
>
> Ant wrote:
> I certainly don't look like it? How the hell would you know
>
> By reading your psots. ;)
Psots? I thought you were supposed to be smart.
> ...ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
> That reply of yours, by the way, is a perfect example of "how the
> hell I know". ;)
What stupid question might that be?
>
> For all you know I could be some 40-year-old paedophile
>
> Another fine example of the above. ;)
Not really, I was just pointing out that you wouldn't actually know if I were a 40-year-old paedophile. And don't talk crap about how my posts prove to you that I'm not.
>
> What a load of tripe. "Slurred English," what's that
> supposed to mean?
>
> Ahh, so you have difficulty reading as well as writing?
> Quite a simple concept, read it carefully a few times, think about it
> a little - you'll eventually figure it out.
I don't think you quite get what I was trying to say. I know what slurred English is, it's just I don't speak it. Take it from someone with more GAD prizes than you can ever imagine.
>
> Probably just one of your many smart-***e comments.
>
> No, no, boy. Smart-***e comments is the kind of thing you attempt, I'm
> merely replying, but apparently you seem to have difficulty
> understanding English.
Your repetitive comments about my understanding of English are becoming tiresome now, I'll just point out what I wrote above about my 18 Gameaday prizes which certainly isn't the easiest thing in the world to do if you don't understand English.
Thought of any new 'insults' yet?
>
> I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but you're worse than
> Stryke.
>
> *Yawns*
>
> Take a look at the replies to this topic whilst I was still arguing
> with DW, you see them? Ok, good... now, notice that the majority say
> "Babble is right"? ;)
>
> These people can read, these people noticed the fact I'd pointed out a
> few topics, these people read those topics and as such knew what they
> were talking about. You're not one of these people, because you're
> blathering on for the sake of blathering on, and know boIIocks all
> about the topic in question.
Actually, I came in here and the DW topic just joking around, talking about irrelevant phrases such as "insolence personified." I knew DW would stay, he just can't resist my charms. ;)
> Do wake me if you ever manage to catch up with the rest of us. )
I think I'd prefer you asleep to be quite perfectly honest.
> Ant wrote:
> I didn't contradict myself. You're right, I don't believe in
> Evolution, I believe in Creation. Doesn't mean I'm contradicting
> myself though.
>
> Yes it does. ;)
> You mock a belief founded on SOME scientific fact, to later state you
> subscribe to one based upon ZERO scientific fact... that, boy, is
> called a contradiction. Also makes you look damn stupid. ;)
I wasn't mocking, just joking around. Although apparently you don't know what that constitutes, so I suppose I'll have to go into further detail. I know that evolution, evolutionary process or whatever is accepted all the way around the World and I can accept that. People such as Goatboy can testify to that, as on many an occasion I have taken part in civilised religious debates with him, and in the end we've just come to the conclusion that he believes in Evolution/Big Bang, and I believe in Creation.
And I don't need scientific fact to know that God exists (although it has been proven many times over that Jesus existed, and they've found thousands of artefacts), because I have a relationship with him. As does Flanders. Mock us if you will, but we have more proof of God existing than you could ever have in Evolution. But that's up to you obviously, I'll just do my best to try and help people see what I've seen.
> Come on children, whats wrong? Even with your horde of pygmy-minded
> buddies you can't concoct a half-decent retort between the lot of
> you?
This brings me to another point...if we 'pygmy-minded, mud-slinging' kids, teenagers and adults if you include Flanders, are so unintelligent and boring, why do you continue to reply to our retorts? And judging by the ease I have managed to burn down your latest argument with, I don't think it's us who's concocting the less than half-decent retorts.
*Ant takes a deep breath, and goes to chat to people with opinions that actually matter*
You know, there's probably a reason why people are prone to arguing with you.
Pointless Babble wrote:
> It's not THAT hard, we tax paying people do fund the education
> department so that you end up capable of such practice, so why have I
> yet to see anything interesting? ;)
Everyone pays tax - on anything you buy. So in some ways, we help fund our own education.
> It's not THAT hard, we tax paying people do fund the education
> department so that you end up capable of such practice, so why have I
> yet to see anything interesting? ;)
Everyone pays tax - on anything you buy. So in some ways, we help fund our own education.
Have SR finally fulfilled my request for an eternal n00b? Have they chosen PB? My word, yes they have!
gerrid wrote:
> So is that why you've stopped arguing then
Ok, let me run this by you one more time, I'll do it R E A L L Y slowly so as you can understand...
Myself, DW and Quinty did stop arguing, that was a few days back. After this point, Ant, Flanders, and yourself opened those flapping maws of yours, and here we are now. ;)
That slow enough for you? Or will you be needing pictures as well?
> Pokey Hats, arguments and racial slurrs. All in a days work for PB.
Pokey hats are only here to be given out to you lucky kids... I have a special one right here for you Gerrid, it has a nice, decorative "D" emblazoned across the front; to make you feel all special. ;)
Racial slurs, nope, none of them - although seeing as you obviously expect one: pipe down you bloated taff. Surely theres a field out there somewhere you haven't pillaged yet? ;)
> So is that why you've stopped arguing then
Ok, let me run this by you one more time, I'll do it R E A L L Y slowly so as you can understand...
Myself, DW and Quinty did stop arguing, that was a few days back. After this point, Ant, Flanders, and yourself opened those flapping maws of yours, and here we are now. ;)
That slow enough for you? Or will you be needing pictures as well?
> Pokey Hats, arguments and racial slurrs. All in a days work for PB.
Pokey hats are only here to be given out to you lucky kids... I have a special one right here for you Gerrid, it has a nice, decorative "D" emblazoned across the front; to make you feel all special. ;)
Racial slurs, nope, none of them - although seeing as you obviously expect one: pipe down you bloated taff. Surely theres a field out there somewhere you haven't pillaged yet? ;)
Pointless Babble wrote:
> Indeed you may, AJ. Although my stats have been buggered for a good
> while now... I've been a regular for a good fortnight at least.
---
Aww... this takes the fun out of it all. ;-)
> Indeed you may, AJ. Although my stats have been buggered for a good
> while now... I've been a regular for a good fortnight at least.
---
Aww... this takes the fun out of it all. ;-)
"oh oh they all walked away, they're so mature, why can't you walk away?"
Pointless Babble (C)2002
So is that why you've stopped arguing then, because you're as mature as DW and Quinty? Yep. THAT MUST BE WHY.
Pokey Hats, arguments and racial slurrs. All in a days work for PB.
Pointless Babble (C)2002
So is that why you've stopped arguing then, because you're as mature as DW and Quinty? Yep. THAT MUST BE WHY.
Pokey Hats, arguments and racial slurrs. All in a days work for PB.
Indeed you may, AJ. Although my stats have been buggered for a good while now... I've been a regular for a good fortnight at least.
Pointless Babble, I'll miss you being a newbie once you reach that Regular stage.
Can we still argue with you?
Can we still argue with you?
Flanders wrote:
> Oh my - Look everyone - Pointless Babble's ranting and arguing with
> people, Nothing much changes there then.
Actually, DW and Quint stopped arguing with me a fair while back, it's just clowns like you and Ant walking in and looking for trouble now. Pay attention. ;)
> Just one question PB - If you really think that you are so superior to
> all these teenagers that you are arguing with here then why don't you
> just leave. Is it some kind of power / ego trip for you to think you
> can outsmart kids ?
Foolish boy, again, pay attention.
It states quite clearly in my previous replies that you and the others like yourself are a minority, the decent posters outnumber idiots such as yourselves, and I enjoy chatting with them. It's not so much a case of outsmarting them, as making sure they know their role in life. ;)
Ant wrote:
> I certainly don't look like it? How the hell would you know
By reading your psots. ;)
...ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
That reply of yours, by the way, is a perfect example of "how the hell I know". ;)
> For all you know I could be some 40-year-old paedophile
Another fine example of the above. ;)
> What a load of tripe. "Slurred English," what's that supposed to mean?
Ahh, so you have difficulty reading as well as writing?
Quite a simple concept, read it carefully a few times, think about it a little - you'll eventually figure it out.
> Probably just one of your many smart-***e comments.
No, no, boy. Smart-***e comments is the kind of thing you attempt, I'm merely replying, but apparently you seem to have difficulty understanding English.
> I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but you're worse than Stryke.
*Yawns*
Take a look at the replies to this topic whilst I was still arguing with DW, you see them? Ok, good... now, notice that the majority say "Babble is right"? ;)
These people can read, these people noticed the fact I'd pointed out a few topics, these people read those topics and as such knew what they were talking about. You're not one of these people, because you're blathering on for the sake of blathering on, and know boIIocks all about the topic in question.
Do wake me if you ever manage to catch up with the rest of us. )
gerrid wrote:
> Wow, I think we learned something today children.
Yep: Gerrid needs his eyes checking, all those years of self-abuse finally paid off. ;)
Looky boys and girls, Quinty is back for a second slating, it appears he only has balls when there are people to back him up - no wonder he gave up beforehand. ;)
The Devious Dragon wrote:
> He's afraid to answer now, he too afraid of being beat up by "someone
> dummer" than he is.
Sorry cretin, you'll find the delay is down to my having a job. You know, those things people get when they're not currently sitting on unemployment benefits, such as yourself. ;)
Pipe down child. ;)
Ant wrote:
> I didn't contradict myself. You're right, I don't believe in Evolution, > I believe in Creation. Doesn't mean I'm contradicting myself though.
Yes it does. ;)
You mock a belief founded on SOME scientific fact, to later state you subscribe to one based upon ZERO scientific fact... that, boy, is called a contradiction. Also makes you look damn stupid. ;)
Come on children, whats wrong? Even with your horde of pygmy-minded buddies you can't concoct a half-decent retort between the lot of you?
It's not THAT hard, we tax paying people do fund the education department so that you end up capable of such practice, so why have I yet to see anything interesting? ;)
> Oh my - Look everyone - Pointless Babble's ranting and arguing with
> people, Nothing much changes there then.
Actually, DW and Quint stopped arguing with me a fair while back, it's just clowns like you and Ant walking in and looking for trouble now. Pay attention. ;)
> Just one question PB - If you really think that you are so superior to
> all these teenagers that you are arguing with here then why don't you
> just leave. Is it some kind of power / ego trip for you to think you
> can outsmart kids ?
Foolish boy, again, pay attention.
It states quite clearly in my previous replies that you and the others like yourself are a minority, the decent posters outnumber idiots such as yourselves, and I enjoy chatting with them. It's not so much a case of outsmarting them, as making sure they know their role in life. ;)
Ant wrote:
> I certainly don't look like it? How the hell would you know
By reading your psots. ;)
...ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
That reply of yours, by the way, is a perfect example of "how the hell I know". ;)
> For all you know I could be some 40-year-old paedophile
Another fine example of the above. ;)
> What a load of tripe. "Slurred English," what's that supposed to mean?
Ahh, so you have difficulty reading as well as writing?
Quite a simple concept, read it carefully a few times, think about it a little - you'll eventually figure it out.
> Probably just one of your many smart-***e comments.
No, no, boy. Smart-***e comments is the kind of thing you attempt, I'm merely replying, but apparently you seem to have difficulty understanding English.
> I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but you're worse than Stryke.
*Yawns*
Take a look at the replies to this topic whilst I was still arguing with DW, you see them? Ok, good... now, notice that the majority say "Babble is right"? ;)
These people can read, these people noticed the fact I'd pointed out a few topics, these people read those topics and as such knew what they were talking about. You're not one of these people, because you're blathering on for the sake of blathering on, and know boIIocks all about the topic in question.
Do wake me if you ever manage to catch up with the rest of us. )
gerrid wrote:
> Wow, I think we learned something today children.
Yep: Gerrid needs his eyes checking, all those years of self-abuse finally paid off. ;)
Looky boys and girls, Quinty is back for a second slating, it appears he only has balls when there are people to back him up - no wonder he gave up beforehand. ;)
The Devious Dragon wrote:
> He's afraid to answer now, he too afraid of being beat up by "someone
> dummer" than he is.
Sorry cretin, you'll find the delay is down to my having a job. You know, those things people get when they're not currently sitting on unemployment benefits, such as yourself. ;)
Pipe down child. ;)
Ant wrote:
> I didn't contradict myself. You're right, I don't believe in Evolution, > I believe in Creation. Doesn't mean I'm contradicting myself though.
Yes it does. ;)
You mock a belief founded on SOME scientific fact, to later state you subscribe to one based upon ZERO scientific fact... that, boy, is called a contradiction. Also makes you look damn stupid. ;)
Come on children, whats wrong? Even with your horde of pygmy-minded buddies you can't concoct a half-decent retort between the lot of you?
It's not THAT hard, we tax paying people do fund the education department so that you end up capable of such practice, so why have I yet to see anything interesting? ;)
Page: