The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
......Stand up and be counted boy, i think you owe DW an apology.
I don't think you realise what he's been through.
You should know better.
I don't think you realise what he's been through.
You should know better.
Page:
Pointless Babble wrote:
>
> You came in here looking for a fight, plain and simple.. but then
> we're forgetting your lack of background knowledge aren't we? ;)
>
> You see, the argument with Dead was over his, Herc's, and Quinty's
> giving some newbie a hard time and insulting RM18 concurrently... so
> your waltzing in and continuing your practice of "insult whoever
> has newb by their name" only got you a rude awakening.
You really do amaze me with your ignorance.
Came in here looking for a fight? I agree with exactly what Flanders said, and...well actually, lets take a look at what actually happened. The following is one of my first posts in this topic, and your reply:
_______________________________________
Pointless Babble
"CavŽe CanŽem"
Newbie stats
on 15/09/2002 at 9.01PM Well, lets take a look at the facts shall we, Ant? ;)
1) I am here, you are here.
2) My intelligence outgrades yours.
Now, the logical conclusion would be that my genome contains something that aided my nurture more than yours did, to the point of this outcome. Therefore, it would be methodical to assume in that case, that if there can be so many variations in a people there must be some process by which they advance.
Out of curiousity, do you ever make any relevant comments?
Ant
"Numerically Astound"
Notable stats
on 15/09/2002 at 8.56PM Pointless Babble wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> "Insolence personified" springs to mind.
>
> That you are, boy, that you are. ;)
True, but I'm not the one who apparently believes in the so-called 'evolutionary process'. ;)
___________________________________________
Now, lets see. I came in here just looking for a laugh really, now that the whole thing between you and DW seemed to have died down. I noted your rather egotistical comment to someone about how you were several notches higher in the evolutionary scale than them, and the reply is what you see above. A joke.
Respectful people with like Goatboy are always taking little jabs at my beliefs, but I don't mind, because I do exactly the same thing. My comment on the evolutionary process, although I don't personally believe in it, was just a joke. A bit of fun.
Now, lets see your reply. It looks like someone overreacted. You put me down numerous times and insulted me over my intelligence, and the relevancy of my comments.
So the question is now, who was really looking for a fight? I think the answer's quite obvious.
So shush. :D
>
> You came in here looking for a fight, plain and simple.. but then
> we're forgetting your lack of background knowledge aren't we? ;)
>
> You see, the argument with Dead was over his, Herc's, and Quinty's
> giving some newbie a hard time and insulting RM18 concurrently... so
> your waltzing in and continuing your practice of "insult whoever
> has newb by their name" only got you a rude awakening.
You really do amaze me with your ignorance.
Came in here looking for a fight? I agree with exactly what Flanders said, and...well actually, lets take a look at what actually happened. The following is one of my first posts in this topic, and your reply:
_______________________________________
Pointless Babble
"CavŽe CanŽem"
Newbie stats
on 15/09/2002 at 9.01PM Well, lets take a look at the facts shall we, Ant? ;)
1) I am here, you are here.
2) My intelligence outgrades yours.
Now, the logical conclusion would be that my genome contains something that aided my nurture more than yours did, to the point of this outcome. Therefore, it would be methodical to assume in that case, that if there can be so many variations in a people there must be some process by which they advance.
Out of curiousity, do you ever make any relevant comments?
Ant
"Numerically Astound"
Notable stats
on 15/09/2002 at 8.56PM Pointless Babble wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> "Insolence personified" springs to mind.
>
> That you are, boy, that you are. ;)
True, but I'm not the one who apparently believes in the so-called 'evolutionary process'. ;)
___________________________________________
Now, lets see. I came in here just looking for a laugh really, now that the whole thing between you and DW seemed to have died down. I noted your rather egotistical comment to someone about how you were several notches higher in the evolutionary scale than them, and the reply is what you see above. A joke.
Respectful people with like Goatboy are always taking little jabs at my beliefs, but I don't mind, because I do exactly the same thing. My comment on the evolutionary process, although I don't personally believe in it, was just a joke. A bit of fun.
Now, lets see your reply. It looks like someone overreacted. You put me down numerous times and insulted me over my intelligence, and the relevancy of my comments.
So the question is now, who was really looking for a fight? I think the answer's quite obvious.
So shush. :D
Pointless Babble wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> *scoffs* For a start, Flanders is older than you
>
> Doubtful... although I find your comment especially amusing, given you
> don't know my age. ;)
>
> and certainly more
> capable of having civilised conversation with peoples younger than
> himself.
>
> ROFL... sorry clown, who was it who came looking for a fight with me?
> ;)
>
I didn't come in here looking for a fight PB - I just happened to look at the topic and found it incredulous what had been happening.
I have seen you on these forums on many occasions in the past have these kind of arguments - it seems to be the way you are - so be it.
I wont be posting in here anymore but doubtless you will - as in the past - come in to have the last word with some more of your amazingly cutting retorts. Enjoy your moment..
> Ant wrote:
> *scoffs* For a start, Flanders is older than you
>
> Doubtful... although I find your comment especially amusing, given you
> don't know my age. ;)
>
> and certainly more
> capable of having civilised conversation with peoples younger than
> himself.
>
> ROFL... sorry clown, who was it who came looking for a fight with me?
> ;)
>
I didn't come in here looking for a fight PB - I just happened to look at the topic and found it incredulous what had been happening.
I have seen you on these forums on many occasions in the past have these kind of arguments - it seems to be the way you are - so be it.
I wont be posting in here anymore but doubtless you will - as in the past - come in to have the last word with some more of your amazingly cutting retorts. Enjoy your moment..
Pointless Babble wrote:
> Foolish boy,
Get your facts right before coming back with such statements - I am not a boy at all as the majority of the regular posters here know - I am a few years older than most on here.
I happen to respect other peoples points of view and am prepared to read and try to understand rather than just try to come back with silly little retorts, but just for you....
You claim to be a more mature person too - start acting like it then.
> Foolish boy,
Get your facts right before coming back with such statements - I am not a boy at all as the majority of the regular posters here know - I am a few years older than most on here.
I happen to respect other peoples points of view and am prepared to read and try to understand rather than just try to come back with silly little retorts, but just for you....
You claim to be a more mature person too - start acting like it then.
Must be loving the attention.
Ant wrote:
> I've just received an e-mail entitled, "Someone Likes You,"
> from Matchmaker.com.
>
> PB, have you got anything to do with this? :D
I suppose it'd help if I had your e-mail address, and secondly if I was bothered enough about you to waste my time doing so... but whatever floats your boat kiddo. ;)
> I've just received an e-mail entitled, "Someone Likes You,"
> from Matchmaker.com.
>
> PB, have you got anything to do with this? :D
I suppose it'd help if I had your e-mail address, and secondly if I was bothered enough about you to waste my time doing so... but whatever floats your boat kiddo. ;)
Ant wrote:
> *scoffs* For a start, Flanders is older than you
Doubtful... although I find your comment especially amusing, given you don't know my age. ;)
> and certainly more
> capable of having civilised conversation with peoples younger than
> himself.
ROFL... sorry clown, who was it who came looking for a fight with me? ;)
> Role in life? Yes, and I suppose your's is to be an absolute git.
Someone has to introduce you to life's harsh realities, who better than someone who humiliates, and infuriates you? ;)
> Psots? I thought you were supposed to be smart.
Once again you so graciously prove that you are infact devoid of any intelligence, by failing to notice what is commonly know as a "typo". They're also know as typographic mistakes, they happen when someone who types very quickly hits the adjacent key to the one they meant to use, or is typing faster still and presses two in the reverse order.
Quite common, amongst people unlike you, who don't type with one finger and verbalising each letter as they key it in. ;)
> What stupid question might that be?
"How the hell do you know?"
> Not really, I was just pointing out that you wouldn't actually know if
> I were a 40-year-old paedophile. And don't talk crap about how my
> posts prove to you that I'm not.
LOL... you moron, my comment was directed at your being an idiot, and using an analogy between yourself and a paedophile proving it. Not your comment proving that you are infact, a paedophile, so thank you for providing yet another example of your "inert" status. ;)
The comment on my not knowing you from dirt is merely another example of your inability to produce relevant comment. )
> I don't think you quite get what I was trying to say. I know what
> slurred English is, it's just I don't speak it.
I'm afraid you do, it's only recently you've been sitting going over your posts several times looking for errors I could use as fuel, as previous to that I pointed out several low-brow comments of yours.
> Your repetitive comments about my understanding of English are
> becoming tiresome now
They're repeated so frequently as you seem to have failed to take heed of it. Perhaps learning to read, instead of constantly proving your inability with half-cocked retorts might change that? ;)
> I'll just point out what I wrote above about my
> 18 Gameaday prizes which certainly isn't the easiest thing in the
> world to do if you don't understand English.
*Yawns*
Child, gameaday is awarded to the most interesting/informative/amusing topic each day, not the one with the best grammar or spelling. Again you astound me with another irrelevant comment, but really, if you have some condition whereby you require to remind yourself of your GAD wins for ego fluffing - be my guest. ;)
> Thought of any new 'insults' yet?
How's about "incompetant"? ;)
> Actually, I came in here and the DW topic just joking around, talking
> about irrelevant phrases such as "insolence personified." I
> knew DW would stay, he just can't resist my charms. ;)
You came in here looking for a fight, plain and simple.. but then we're forgetting your lack of background knowledge aren't we? ;)
You see, the argument with Dead was over his, Herc's, and Quinty's giving some newbie a hard time and insulting RM18 concurrently... so your waltzing in and continuing your practice of "insult whoever has newb by their name" only got you a rude awakening. Tsk, tsk. ;)
> I think I'd prefer you asleep to be quite perfectly honest.
At this rate, that is highly likely to be the result, you have yet to show me any degree of intellect on your part.
> I wasn't mocking, just joking around.
Hmmm... lets see, I point out I'm of a greater education than yourself, you state that someone who believes darwin's theories can't be very smart. Then you state that your believing in "god" is different... hmmm.
> I know that evolution, evolutionary process or whatever is
> accepted all the way around the World and I can accept that. People
> such as Goatboy can testify to that, as on many an occasion I have
> taken part in civilised religious debates with him, and in the end
> we've just come to the conclusion that he believes in Evolution/Big
> Bang, and I believe in Creation.
Thats entirely fine, the issue here is you made yourself look an idiot with your comment, I merely pointed it out for you. Perhaps it might save you from doing so in future. ;)
> And I don't need scientific fact to know that God exists (although it
> has been proven many times over that Jesus existed, and they've found
> thousands of artefacts), because I have a relationship with him.
Ahhh of course, well that makes it rock solid fact for everyone, silly me for doubting you. ;)
In the meantime I'll burn a few odd people, fight a few wars against heretics, and slaughter some meaningless savages whilst repeatedly chanting "thou shalt not kill!". It'll serve as recompense for my obvious ignorance, of course God exists.
*rolls eyes*
> Mock us if you will, but we have more proof of God
> existing than you could ever have in Evolution.
I trust you'll share it with all of us then. ;)
> I'll just do my best to try and help people see what I've seen.
Four shrinks, and a padded cell. ;)
> This brings me to another point...if we 'pygmy-minded, mud-slinging'
> kids, teenagers and adults if you include Flanders, are so
> unintelligent and boring, why do you continue to reply to our retorts?
Because I'm not prepared to allow you the satisfaction of continuing your usual rigmarole, it's referred to above if you still follow the initial topic, if not - I'm sure you'll ask again.
> And judging by the ease I have managed to burn down your latest
> argument with
*Bursts into hysterics*
Sure thing, kid. You really did that... I mean, that God comment, there was no possible way I could win against that.
> *Ant takes a deep breath, and goes to chat to people with opinions
> that actually matter*
Like his imaginary friend, Bobo the clown, and the hosts of Angels dancing in his head. ;)
> *scoffs* For a start, Flanders is older than you
Doubtful... although I find your comment especially amusing, given you don't know my age. ;)
> and certainly more
> capable of having civilised conversation with peoples younger than
> himself.
ROFL... sorry clown, who was it who came looking for a fight with me? ;)
> Role in life? Yes, and I suppose your's is to be an absolute git.
Someone has to introduce you to life's harsh realities, who better than someone who humiliates, and infuriates you? ;)
> Psots? I thought you were supposed to be smart.
Once again you so graciously prove that you are infact devoid of any intelligence, by failing to notice what is commonly know as a "typo". They're also know as typographic mistakes, they happen when someone who types very quickly hits the adjacent key to the one they meant to use, or is typing faster still and presses two in the reverse order.
Quite common, amongst people unlike you, who don't type with one finger and verbalising each letter as they key it in. ;)
> What stupid question might that be?
"How the hell do you know?"
> Not really, I was just pointing out that you wouldn't actually know if
> I were a 40-year-old paedophile. And don't talk crap about how my
> posts prove to you that I'm not.
LOL... you moron, my comment was directed at your being an idiot, and using an analogy between yourself and a paedophile proving it. Not your comment proving that you are infact, a paedophile, so thank you for providing yet another example of your "inert" status. ;)
The comment on my not knowing you from dirt is merely another example of your inability to produce relevant comment. )
> I don't think you quite get what I was trying to say. I know what
> slurred English is, it's just I don't speak it.
I'm afraid you do, it's only recently you've been sitting going over your posts several times looking for errors I could use as fuel, as previous to that I pointed out several low-brow comments of yours.
> Your repetitive comments about my understanding of English are
> becoming tiresome now
They're repeated so frequently as you seem to have failed to take heed of it. Perhaps learning to read, instead of constantly proving your inability with half-cocked retorts might change that? ;)
> I'll just point out what I wrote above about my
> 18 Gameaday prizes which certainly isn't the easiest thing in the
> world to do if you don't understand English.
*Yawns*
Child, gameaday is awarded to the most interesting/informative/amusing topic each day, not the one with the best grammar or spelling. Again you astound me with another irrelevant comment, but really, if you have some condition whereby you require to remind yourself of your GAD wins for ego fluffing - be my guest. ;)
> Thought of any new 'insults' yet?
How's about "incompetant"? ;)
> Actually, I came in here and the DW topic just joking around, talking
> about irrelevant phrases such as "insolence personified." I
> knew DW would stay, he just can't resist my charms. ;)
You came in here looking for a fight, plain and simple.. but then we're forgetting your lack of background knowledge aren't we? ;)
You see, the argument with Dead was over his, Herc's, and Quinty's giving some newbie a hard time and insulting RM18 concurrently... so your waltzing in and continuing your practice of "insult whoever has newb by their name" only got you a rude awakening. Tsk, tsk. ;)
> I think I'd prefer you asleep to be quite perfectly honest.
At this rate, that is highly likely to be the result, you have yet to show me any degree of intellect on your part.
> I wasn't mocking, just joking around.
Hmmm... lets see, I point out I'm of a greater education than yourself, you state that someone who believes darwin's theories can't be very smart. Then you state that your believing in "god" is different... hmmm.
> I know that evolution, evolutionary process or whatever is
> accepted all the way around the World and I can accept that. People
> such as Goatboy can testify to that, as on many an occasion I have
> taken part in civilised religious debates with him, and in the end
> we've just come to the conclusion that he believes in Evolution/Big
> Bang, and I believe in Creation.
Thats entirely fine, the issue here is you made yourself look an idiot with your comment, I merely pointed it out for you. Perhaps it might save you from doing so in future. ;)
> And I don't need scientific fact to know that God exists (although it
> has been proven many times over that Jesus existed, and they've found
> thousands of artefacts), because I have a relationship with him.
Ahhh of course, well that makes it rock solid fact for everyone, silly me for doubting you. ;)
In the meantime I'll burn a few odd people, fight a few wars against heretics, and slaughter some meaningless savages whilst repeatedly chanting "thou shalt not kill!". It'll serve as recompense for my obvious ignorance, of course God exists.
*rolls eyes*
> Mock us if you will, but we have more proof of God
> existing than you could ever have in Evolution.
I trust you'll share it with all of us then. ;)
> I'll just do my best to try and help people see what I've seen.
Four shrinks, and a padded cell. ;)
> This brings me to another point...if we 'pygmy-minded, mud-slinging'
> kids, teenagers and adults if you include Flanders, are so
> unintelligent and boring, why do you continue to reply to our retorts?
Because I'm not prepared to allow you the satisfaction of continuing your usual rigmarole, it's referred to above if you still follow the initial topic, if not - I'm sure you'll ask again.
> And judging by the ease I have managed to burn down your latest
> argument with
*Bursts into hysterics*
Sure thing, kid. You really did that... I mean, that God comment, there was no possible way I could win against that.
> *Ant takes a deep breath, and goes to chat to people with opinions
> that actually matter*
Like his imaginary friend, Bobo the clown, and the hosts of Angels dancing in his head. ;)
I've just received an e-mail entitled, "Someone Likes You," from Matchmaker.com.
PB, have you got anything to do with this? :D
PB, have you got anything to do with this? :D
AfroJoe wrote:
> *Ant raises his word count a little further in the form of 5,000
> words*
>
> ;-)
>
> Anyhoo, I really don't have a problem with Pointless Babble at all,
> but you lot really seem to. Why? :-)
I didn't either until he started insultingly replying to my meaningless banter, which really wasn't meant to start an argument in any way.
I'd rather not continue after this to be honest, I can't be bothered with it anymore. I know that I understand English, and most importantly I know myself better than anyone, and I'm not gonna try and prove that to PB. In fact, I don't actually need to prove it to him.
> *Ant raises his word count a little further in the form of 5,000
> words*
>
> ;-)
>
> Anyhoo, I really don't have a problem with Pointless Babble at all,
> but you lot really seem to. Why? :-)
I didn't either until he started insultingly replying to my meaningless banter, which really wasn't meant to start an argument in any way.
I'd rather not continue after this to be honest, I can't be bothered with it anymore. I know that I understand English, and most importantly I know myself better than anyone, and I'm not gonna try and prove that to PB. In fact, I don't actually need to prove it to him.
*Ant raises his word count a little further in the form of 5,000 words*
;-)
Anyhoo, I really don't have a problem with Pointless Babble at all, but you lot really seem to. Why? :-)
;-)
Anyhoo, I really don't have a problem with Pointless Babble at all, but you lot really seem to. Why? :-)
gerrid wrote:
> Have SR finally fulfilled my request for an eternal n00b? Have they
> chosen PB? My word, yes they have!
Yip, they did it sometime after you were made the first eternal embryo. Guess you finally have a playmate, oh wait... no, no you don't. ;)
> Have SR finally fulfilled my request for an eternal n00b? Have they
> chosen PB? My word, yes they have!
Yip, they did it sometime after you were made the first eternal embryo. Guess you finally have a playmate, oh wait... no, no you don't. ;)
Page: