Viewing Thread:
"Famitsu Score Mario Sunshine.....Read On To Find Out"

Mario Sunshine (Nintendo): 10 / 8 / 8 / 10 (36/40)

Compare This To Famitsu's Other Scores From The Previous Years:?

Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time: 10, 10, 10, 10
Super Mario 64: 10, 10, 10, 9
Tekken 3: 10, 10, 10, 9
Final Fantasy VII: 10, 10, 9, 9
Metal Gear Solid: 10, 9, 9, 9


Not Too Bad I Suppose

Umm guys, that score isn't from the weekly Famitsu since it hasn't appeared in this week's edition. However, that score came from Famitsu Cube & Advance.

And the reason why it was marked down? Apparently, the game becomes a lot more difficult in the second-part of the title.

This magazine accepts bribes.. remember that. Just like Edge.

Stupid. All RPG's get 40/40, so do beat-em-ups. Nothing else can.

Tiltawhirl wrote:
though quite why they gave
> Metal Gear Solid a 9 for lastability I have no idea.

Ah, you can spend hours on that game going around collecting all the dog tags from the bad guys...if thats your thing...

AfroJoe wrote:
> Graphics, Sounds, Gameplay and Lifespan.

Surely the score he quoted wasn't in that order...? Or graphics got 10/10! From the shots they are very nice, but 10/10... I would've thought graphics was one of the 8's...

Hmmm i would agree with the rest of the scores but not 39 for a brainless beat-em-up. I mean it beat Final Fantasy 7, that should be illegal.

God knows, I reckon Famitsu are a bunch of plonkers anyway, they said that Wave Race and Luigi's Mansion where AAA title's. They where good but not that good.

Tekken 3 got 39?!?

Not too bad my butt hole that's hella good, though quite why they gave Metal Gear Solid a 9 for lastability I have no idea. The only reason it wont be marked as good as Mario 64 is most likely cause Mario 64 was so fricking ground breaking.

Graphics, Sounds, Gameplay and Lifespan.

It must be good but not as good as Mario 64

What does each score mean?