The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!
Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.
Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.
Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.
Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.
Page:
votign is only fun when its for a fun candidate, and i dont think anyone in particular fits the bill
Sorry to hear about your Nan Dringo. :-( My Nan died a couple of years ago (great nan - my grandads mum), worst part is my Grandad blaimed himself over it and it was hard for me to see him upset cause as far as I'm concerned, he's one of the nicest people you could ever meet.
Anyway, good luck mate.
Anyway, good luck mate.
Grandprix wrote:
> Perhaps some people who spend like forever on these forums put forth
> about 5 people as candidates and then let the regulars vote?
Great idea, just that means another vote before the elections deciding who should be in them.
Plus lots of arguing about people wanting to vote for who they think deserves it. Ah well.
> Perhaps some people who spend like forever on these forums put forth
> about 5 people as candidates and then let the regulars vote?
Great idea, just that means another vote before the elections deciding who should be in them.
Plus lots of arguing about people wanting to vote for who they think deserves it. Ah well.
Its all about voting to make it fun :)
Okay...check out the newbie called waterbiscuit...
Registered 117 days ago but only done 4 posts...
Registered 117 days ago but only done 4 posts...
Grandprix wrote:
> Perhaps some people who spend like forever on these forums put forth
> about 5 people as candidates and then let the regulars vote?
-------
That's actually a very good idea, it would stop the countless number of one vote wonders that appear, usually because people are voting for each other as favours, or just voting for their friends.
> Perhaps some people who spend like forever on these forums put forth
> about 5 people as candidates and then let the regulars vote?
-------
That's actually a very good idea, it would stop the countless number of one vote wonders that appear, usually because people are voting for each other as favours, or just voting for their friends.
i think for comedy value people shoudl have voted for me, then again why would they?
Sorry to hear the news Dringo.
My nan died last year, so I kinda know how you feel. All the best mate.
My nan died last year, so I kinda know how you feel. All the best mate.
Perhaps some people who spend like forever on these forums put forth about 5 people as candidates and then let the regulars vote?
Perhaps I should stop rambling...
Perhaps I should stop rambling...
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> I'm not even sure Notables should be allowed to, really.
-------
Finally, a notable who sees sense!
> I'm not even sure Notables should be allowed to, really.
-------
Finally, a notable who sees sense!
Page: