The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!
Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.
Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.
Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.
Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.
Page:
As requested by someone:
As of 23:22, the top 5:
Pro Evo 20
Sonic Rav 20
Monkey_man 18
Venombyte 10
RM18 8
As of 23:22, the top 5:
Pro Evo 20
Sonic Rav 20
Monkey_man 18
Venombyte 10
RM18 8
What do the notables think of this idea about some of you guys selecting candidates for people to vote for?
Or†ega wrote:
> Okay...check out the newbie called waterbiscuit...
>
> Registered 117 days ago but only done 4 posts...
He votes in the elections.
Wow.
> Okay...check out the newbie called waterbiscuit...
>
> Registered 117 days ago but only done 4 posts...
He votes in the elections.
Wow.
i know i already said it was, now go tell someone important!
Current results anyone?
Hopefully some of the staff will read this, if not we should post it in the SR forum, or mention it in the voting thread tomorrow. It's a good idea
Or†ega wrote:
> Okay...check out the newbie called waterbiscuit...
>
> Registered 117 days ago but only done 4 posts...
Ok then, has anyone checked out the user Bollards, registered 800 days ago and has only done 117 posts......is that a record in the number of days been signed up here?
> Okay...check out the newbie called waterbiscuit...
>
> Registered 117 days ago but only done 4 posts...
Ok then, has anyone checked out the user Bollards, registered 800 days ago and has only done 117 posts......is that a record in the number of days been signed up here?
MoJoJoJo wrote:
> Maybe the staff, or better yet, the notables, should put forward the
> candidates? They can see who's doing what, and agree on the top 5 (or,
> if need be, more or less depending on the quality of the forums) then
> they and the regulars can vote
Good idea! thats how it should be
> Maybe the staff, or better yet, the notables, should put forward the
> candidates? They can see who's doing what, and agree on the top 5 (or,
> if need be, more or less depending on the quality of the forums) then
> they and the regulars can vote
Good idea! thats how it should be
Maybe the staff, or better yet, the notables, should put forward the candidates? They can see who's doing what, and agree on the top 5 (or, if need be, more or less depending on the quality of the forums) then they and the regulars can vote
I'd just like to say that I'm a newbie, I've only been here a couple of weeks and I'm not voting because I don't fell I know people well enough yet to be able to make an knowledgeable vote. I have to agree that newbies shouldnt be able to vote for this reason.
Page: