Viewing Thread:
"Notable voting chat thread. Official. Because I said so."

I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!

Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.

Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.

well i still dont know who to choose, i have a few people in mind, i will pick someone by tonight though.

Yes, but the notable is supposed to be a FOG notable, not a Sony forum notable. They've just got their pitiful little crews together and voted for one person because they want to feel important. Rav and Mystique both post in FOG. Thats why they're more deserving.

<:8 )~~Blaze~~( 8:> wrote:
> What qualities are people looking in for in their notable?

depends, but typically a notable should have (according to many of the members in this forum) the following qualities...

Post topics of a reasonably high standard
Not to spam unecessarily
To post regualary

and um some other stuff that depends on what you think makes a good notable

slik ~_~

What qualities are people looking in for in their notable?

Insane Bartender wrote:
> i see the point that agreeing to vote for someone just so that a
> particular forum has it's star voted a notable does seem iffy.

I'm already a Notable! :-)

Besides, it's no different to the Ninty's voting Dringo, etc.

That's not to say that Dringo doesn't deserve it... but it's the same thing. Most people here always vote for their 'friends'.

Stryke wrote:
> No offence to Pro Evo, but if he gets voted in because the Sony forum
> has agreed to vote en masse, it'll be a bit unfair on posters who put
> in more effort like Rav and Mystique.

I don't think it would be unfair at all.

Pro Evo makes many excellent, high-quality posts in the Sony forum. That's why they're keen to vote for him.

Just because you've not seen many of his posts, doesn't mean he puts no effort in. Sorry, but to say that Sonic and Myst put in more effort is just an ill-informed comment. I'm not saying that they don't - I'm saying that Pro Evo does equally.

Stryke wrote:
> No offence to Pro Evo, but if he gets voted in because the Sony forum
> has agreed to vote en masse, it'll be a bit unfair on posters who put
> in more effort like Rav and Mystique.

whereas it's hardly a "fixed" vote, since everyone has been given a vote, and they are simply agreeing beforehand how to use it, i see the point that agreeing to vote for someone just so that a particular forum has it's star voted a notable does seem iffy.

No offence to Pro Evo, but if he gets voted in because the Sony forum has agreed to vote en masse, it'll be a bit unfair on posters who put in more effort like Rav and Mystique.

Ah ! Meant I'm NOT the three legged gorse. ;-)) Well, maybe in another area, but not racewise. ;-)))

One vote for me thats better than I expected :)