The "PC Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> 1) Don't quote a whole post just to add a few lines on the bottom,
> that is blatant word count trickery and gets you nowhere but in forum
> user's bad books.
Pot....kettle....black...
> cipro wrote:
> Jez, shut up with this toss!?!?!? You already have a thread on this,
> don't clog everybody else's up with this meanigless twoddle.
>
>
> Heh heh, an echo of my own words. And sorry to nitpick but you spell
> 'twaddle' with an A, not O. Sorry, couldn't help myself. ;)
Why i.... Calm down cipro, take a deep breath and relax. Now I'm calm again, I would like to say than you for spotting my mistake, and correcting it. Have you also noticed this guy jez is posting the same twaddle (got it right there) allover the place.
Spam, thats what it is, rather than joining discussions hes spamming up the place to advance his post and word count. I shall inform SR if this continues Jez, so I'll advise you to stop now.
> Jez, shut up with this toss!?!?!? You already have a thread on this,
> don't clog everybody else's up with this meanigless twoddle.
Heh heh, an echo of my own words. And sorry to nitpick but you spell 'twaddle' with an A, not O. Sorry, couldn't help myself. ;)
>
> people this is not an isult place if it were don't you think somebody
> would start a thread of it come on we can sort this out or we can
> whine
1) Don't quote a whole post just to add a few lines on the bottom, that is blatant word count trickery and gets you nowhere but in forum user's bad books.
2) When did I whine? I have been having a sensible discussion (read argument) with IB, so quit whinging.
> Insane Bartender wrote:
> Little Hobbo wrote:
> Hellooooo.....
> You have just entirely missed the point you yourself made. You said
> that people took issue with the way you said things, and not what
> you
> actually said. I proved this wrong by showing that it is what you
> say
> that I disagree with, not how you say it. Whether GTA3 is pants or
> not has no relevance in this argument, I used it merely as an
> illustration.
>
> No, I merely claimed that the thread you pointed out had little
> relevance due to the complete lack of serious debate in it.
>
> You STILL miss the point. No matter what the argument consists of, I
> was using it as an illustration ONLY to prove my point. Try reading
> my posts properly.
>
>
> I didn't join this forum thinking "maybe i'll make some friends
> and be less lonely". Anyone who thinks that has a problem. I
> cam
> here to discuss games, life, and the future. If discussing, and
> indeed
> arguing, doesn't gain me great favour, I am still content in that my
> view has at least been read. Besides which, I don't have THAT many
> "enemies" on these boards, you are massively exaggerating
> my
> position.
>
>
> When did I say that you do have enemeys
people this is not an isult place if it were don't you think somebody would start a thread of it come on we can sort this out or we can whine
> Little Hobbo wrote:
> Hellooooo.....
> You have just entirely missed the point you yourself made. You said
> that people took issue with the way you said things, and not what
> you
> actually said. I proved this wrong by showing that it is what you
> say
> that I disagree with, not how you say it. Whether GTA3 is pants or
> not has no relevance in this argument, I used it merely as an
> illustration.
>
> No, I merely claimed that the thread you pointed out had little
> relevance due to the complete lack of serious debate in it.
You STILL miss the point. No matter what the argument consists of, I was using it as an illustration ONLY to prove my point. Try reading my posts properly.
>
> I didn't join this forum thinking "maybe i'll make some friends
> and be less lonely". Anyone who thinks that has a problem. I cam
> here to discuss games, life, and the future. If discussing, and indeed
> arguing, doesn't gain me great favour, I am still content in that my
> view has at least been read. Besides which, I don't have THAT many
> "enemies" on these boards, you are massively exaggerating my
> position.
When did I say that you do have enemies?