The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
You will.
He'll wear you down with his big words and fancy Latin, and you'll come round to his way of thinking. (Albeit a somewhat inferior version of it).
;o)
He'll wear you down with his big words and fancy Latin, and you'll come round to his way of thinking. (Albeit a somewhat inferior version of it).
;o)
Page:
nh wrote:
> You are self opinionated and feel that you are totally superior when
> you are not.
I have said too many times that that is not how i feel. I can now only assume that you are calling me a liar. Put forth decent proof of this, or be held in contempt.
> You are wrong you fool.
I am wrong IN YOUR OPINION. But wrong in what sense? That I know some complexity theory? how is knowledge wrong? Your point makes no sense.
How else then? That I'm pessimist? Life is not what you think it is in MY EYES. I refuse to allow YOU to dictate what I believe merely on principle. If you can find a decent argument that shows I should think differently, than I will consider it, otherwise, you are attempting to press your views on others simply because it's your way of thinking - something I would never do, yet something people like you have been accusing me of all day.
Absolutely pathetic, just because I provide some evidence against your lives being the bowl of cherries you think they are, you treat me like a second class citizen. YOU are the one's forcing views on others, with little or no reason for that view to be adopted, and to be perfectly frank, that is absolutely and unforgivably inhumane.
Nothing you can do will force me to take your views, however happy go lucky they are. The only way i'll ever think like you is if you give me decent reason to.
You have poorly constructed arguments, and lack the logic base to see what you're actually trying to achieve. Utterly pathetic.
> You are self opinionated and feel that you are totally superior when
> you are not.
I have said too many times that that is not how i feel. I can now only assume that you are calling me a liar. Put forth decent proof of this, or be held in contempt.
> You are wrong you fool.
I am wrong IN YOUR OPINION. But wrong in what sense? That I know some complexity theory? how is knowledge wrong? Your point makes no sense.
How else then? That I'm pessimist? Life is not what you think it is in MY EYES. I refuse to allow YOU to dictate what I believe merely on principle. If you can find a decent argument that shows I should think differently, than I will consider it, otherwise, you are attempting to press your views on others simply because it's your way of thinking - something I would never do, yet something people like you have been accusing me of all day.
Absolutely pathetic, just because I provide some evidence against your lives being the bowl of cherries you think they are, you treat me like a second class citizen. YOU are the one's forcing views on others, with little or no reason for that view to be adopted, and to be perfectly frank, that is absolutely and unforgivably inhumane.
Nothing you can do will force me to take your views, however happy go lucky they are. The only way i'll ever think like you is if you give me decent reason to.
You have poorly constructed arguments, and lack the logic base to see what you're actually trying to achieve. Utterly pathetic.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Brew wrote:
> I was referring to your objective attitude in that you have to argue
> against whatever anbody else has said. I doubt if you really agree
> with yourself, so long as you can try and down other people. Well I
> hope it brings much joy and and a sense of satisfaction into your
> life!!!
>
> Actually, I think Complexity is a very clever science.
And what gives
> me satisfaction is knowing that although I've maintained the same
> opinions and views throughout today, the people who have been posting
> along at the same time have switched opinions more often than I care
> to recall.
If those really are your opinions I really do pity those poor people that you play a part in the lives of.
>
> You attack me because I have views, and that is borderline racism. You
> don't like the fact that not all in the world is good, and coated in
> cherries, fair enough. But the kind of abuse I've had today is usually
> reserved the kind of person who throws bricks through cornershop
> windows because they don't like the skin colour of the man at the
> till.
Sigh, here we go again. I haven't up til this post attacked your views, PLEASE check your facts.
> Absolutely appaling. But unlike you, i'm not going to judge you on it.
> Note that that is the real difference between us.
I have never yet judged a person who I have not known properly for more than a month. Where did you dig up that idea?
Now we could go on all day exchanging blows like you and Goaty, but I just want to make one thing clear.
"The reason I object to your posts is that it does not make SR a nice place to be"
There, do you finally realise why everyone has started hating you in the past few hours? It's because you are just not a nice person to talk with. Views or no views, you don't need to spread them everywhere with the result that you make SR a fighting ground rather than a chat forum.
OK, now I've got a test of your maturity. Let's see if we can both just leave this matter alone. I've had enough of it and you, as has everyone else I expect. I only ask that you leave SR out of your views, correct or not. That means not typing snidey posts back in the fervent hope that they may have gone home and you can have the upper hand. Can you do that?
> Brew wrote:
> I was referring to your objective attitude in that you have to argue
> against whatever anbody else has said. I doubt if you really agree
> with yourself, so long as you can try and down other people. Well I
> hope it brings much joy and and a sense of satisfaction into your
> life!!!
>
> Actually, I think Complexity is a very clever science.
And what gives
> me satisfaction is knowing that although I've maintained the same
> opinions and views throughout today, the people who have been posting
> along at the same time have switched opinions more often than I care
> to recall.
If those really are your opinions I really do pity those poor people that you play a part in the lives of.
>
> You attack me because I have views, and that is borderline racism. You
> don't like the fact that not all in the world is good, and coated in
> cherries, fair enough. But the kind of abuse I've had today is usually
> reserved the kind of person who throws bricks through cornershop
> windows because they don't like the skin colour of the man at the
> till.
Sigh, here we go again. I haven't up til this post attacked your views, PLEASE check your facts.
> Absolutely appaling. But unlike you, i'm not going to judge you on it.
> Note that that is the real difference between us.
I have never yet judged a person who I have not known properly for more than a month. Where did you dig up that idea?
Now we could go on all day exchanging blows like you and Goaty, but I just want to make one thing clear.
"The reason I object to your posts is that it does not make SR a nice place to be"
There, do you finally realise why everyone has started hating you in the past few hours? It's because you are just not a nice person to talk with. Views or no views, you don't need to spread them everywhere with the result that you make SR a fighting ground rather than a chat forum.
OK, now I've got a test of your maturity. Let's see if we can both just leave this matter alone. I've had enough of it and you, as has everyone else I expect. I only ask that you leave SR out of your views, correct or not. That means not typing snidey posts back in the fervent hope that they may have gone home and you can have the upper hand. Can you do that?
I have to agree with Goatboy
you are a Boring Internet Troll.
You are self opinionated and feel that you are totally superior when you are not.
You are wrong you fool. admit it. Chaos theory is only one paramater under the whole umbrella covered by the science of complexities.
Fool..
you are a Boring Internet Troll.
You are self opinionated and feel that you are totally superior when you are not.
You are wrong you fool. admit it. Chaos theory is only one paramater under the whole umbrella covered by the science of complexities.
Fool..
Brew wrote:
> I was referring to your objective attitude in that you have to argue
> against whatever anbody else has said. I doubt if you really agree
> with yourself, so long as you can try and down other people. Well I
> hope it brings much joy and and a sense of satisfaction into your
> life!!!
Actually, I think Complexity is a very clever science. And what gives me satisfaction is knowing that although I've maintained the same opinions and views throughout today, the people who have been posting along at the same time have switched opinions more often than I care to recall.
You attack me because I have views, and that is borderline racism. You don't like the fact that not all in the world is good, and coated in cherries, fair enough. But the kind of abuse I've had today is usually reserved the kind of person who throws bricks through cornershop windows because they don't like the skin colour of the man at the till.
Absolutely appaling. But unlike you, i'm not going to judge you on it. Note that that is the real difference between us.
> I was referring to your objective attitude in that you have to argue
> against whatever anbody else has said. I doubt if you really agree
> with yourself, so long as you can try and down other people. Well I
> hope it brings much joy and and a sense of satisfaction into your
> life!!!
Actually, I think Complexity is a very clever science. And what gives me satisfaction is knowing that although I've maintained the same opinions and views throughout today, the people who have been posting along at the same time have switched opinions more often than I care to recall.
You attack me because I have views, and that is borderline racism. You don't like the fact that not all in the world is good, and coated in cherries, fair enough. But the kind of abuse I've had today is usually reserved the kind of person who throws bricks through cornershop windows because they don't like the skin colour of the man at the till.
Absolutely appaling. But unlike you, i'm not going to judge you on it. Note that that is the real difference between us.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Brew wrote:
> Biggest pile of objective pap I have ever read
>
> I guess complexity theory isn't your "bag" baby...
I was referring to your objective attitude in that you have to argue against whatever anbody else has said. I doubt if you really agree with yourself, so long as you can try and down other people. Well I hope it brings much joy and and a sense of satisfaction into your life!!!
> Brew wrote:
> Biggest pile of objective pap I have ever read
>
> I guess complexity theory isn't your "bag" baby...
I was referring to your objective attitude in that you have to argue against whatever anbody else has said. I doubt if you really agree with yourself, so long as you can try and down other people. Well I hope it brings much joy and and a sense of satisfaction into your life!!!
OK, I'll give you this much.
Everyone can CHOOSE what they want from life, just not everyone will ever get it.
Everyone can CHOOSE what they want from life, just not everyone will ever get it.
Troll.
Boring internet troll.
Life is exactly what you make of it. Complexity theory whatever.
You choose to be negative, boorish and dull. That is the existence you choose.
I choose to be sassy, upbeat and damn sexay.
That is the existence I choose.
I just wish I could pose as disaffected youth with the same conviction you muster.
But I enjoy life too much.
The sun is out, I'm almost finished at work and I'm going home to talk to friends.
So nyah-nyah-nyah.
You muppet.
Boring internet troll.
Life is exactly what you make of it. Complexity theory whatever.
You choose to be negative, boorish and dull. That is the existence you choose.
I choose to be sassy, upbeat and damn sexay.
That is the existence I choose.
I just wish I could pose as disaffected youth with the same conviction you muster.
But I enjoy life too much.
The sun is out, I'm almost finished at work and I'm going home to talk to friends.
So nyah-nyah-nyah.
You muppet.
nh wrote:
> One thing you can be sure of - If Goatboy ever manages to find out
> where you live, you can be sure he will come round and shove a
> dictionary up your ar..
I can be certain he'll try...
> One thing you can be sure of - If Goatboy ever manages to find out
> where you live, you can be sure he will come round and shove a
> dictionary up your ar..
I can be certain he'll try...
Brew wrote:
> Biggest pile of objective pap I have ever read
I guess complexity theory isn't your "bag" baby...
> Biggest pile of objective pap I have ever read
I guess complexity theory isn't your "bag" baby...
nh wrote:
> Actually Choas is one particular mode of behaviour within the realm of
> Complexity theory, they are not one and the same.
Close but no cigar, nice to know someone knows something about it though.
What was originally known as Chaos Theory was renamed Complexity Theory, as more was studied about it, and the name "Chaos" no longer seemed apt. Chaos Theory is still an element I believe.
> Actually Choas is one particular mode of behaviour within the realm of
> Complexity theory, they are not one and the same.
Close but no cigar, nice to know someone knows something about it though.
What was originally known as Chaos Theory was renamed Complexity Theory, as more was studied about it, and the name "Chaos" no longer seemed apt. Chaos Theory is still an element I believe.
Page: