The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I am going to answer one of todays questions that has plagued philosophers for centuries:
WHICH CAME FIRST THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG?
to find out could everyone give me an answer of either chicken or egg and i will tell what got higher!
WHICH CAME FIRST THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG?
to find out could everyone give me an answer of either chicken or egg and i will tell what got higher!
Page:
dinosaurs laid eggs
Chickens came after dinosaurs
So obviously the Egg came first.
You could probably go back even further to when life only existed in oceans and find creatures that laid eggs but not ckicken's
Egg first
Chickens came after dinosaurs
So obviously the Egg came first.
You could probably go back even further to when life only existed in oceans and find creatures that laid eggs but not ckicken's
Egg first
Anywya, many creatures laid eggs before chickens, so unless we specifically question whether the chicken or the egg it laid came first, the answer is obvious. ;-)
I still stand by the chicken, as the egg it came from was the egg of a creature that had not yet met all off the criteria to be a chicken. Only when this first true chicken laid an egg was the first chicken egg laid.
I still stand by the chicken, as the egg it came from was the egg of a creature that had not yet met all off the criteria to be a chicken. Only when this first true chicken laid an egg was the first chicken egg laid.
Meka Dragon wrote:
> So if a non-chicken laid an egg which contained a chicken, you're
> saying that that egg is a chicken egg because it contains a chicken,
> and not a non-chicken egg because it was laid by a non-chicken?
that's not quite what he was trying to say, but besides, the question didn't specify chicken eggs, just eggs.
IB
> So if a non-chicken laid an egg which contained a chicken, you're
> saying that that egg is a chicken egg because it contains a chicken,
> and not a non-chicken egg because it was laid by a non-chicken?
that's not quite what he was trying to say, but besides, the question didn't specify chicken eggs, just eggs.
IB
A chicken just an egg's way of reproducing.
:D
:D
the egg came first!
umm
umm
Clucking hell I'm confused.
So if a non-chicken laid an egg which contained a chicken, you're saying that that egg is a chicken egg because it contains a chicken, and not a non-chicken egg because it was laid by a non-chicken?
Meka Dragon wrote:
> Not necessarily
hello Meka btw
loki wrote:
> Birds evolved from dinasuars. Which were reptiles, so laid eggs.
> Eggs had been there long before chickens. But its a taxonomical
> question, whatever was the first creature to match all the criteria to
> be a chicken came from an egg. The thing that laid that egg was the
> chicken's nearest evoutionary ancestor, the proto-chicken if you like.
>
>
> The egg came first.
heh, owned by loki. unlucky Meka :P
> Not necessarily
hello Meka btw
loki wrote:
> Birds evolved from dinasuars. Which were reptiles, so laid eggs.
> Eggs had been there long before chickens. But its a taxonomical
> question, whatever was the first creature to match all the criteria to
> be a chicken came from an egg. The thing that laid that egg was the
> chicken's nearest evoutionary ancestor, the proto-chicken if you like.
>
>
> The egg came first.
heh, owned by loki. unlucky Meka :P
Birds evolved from dinasuars. Which were reptiles, so laid eggs. Eggs had been there long before chickens. But its a taxonomical question, whatever was the first creature to match all the criteria to be a chicken came from an egg. The thing that laid that egg was the chicken's nearest evoutionary ancestor, the proto-chicken if you like.
The egg came first.
The egg came first.
egg first, then ckicken, then egg, them omlette
Page: