The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A lot of the newer people here judge a persons worth by thier rank.
Some of the older people, who should know better, still judge a persons worth by thier rank.
The best of the people here judge a person on what they have posted, not the colour of thier name. Personally, Sniper and Er-no are not what I consider to be 'noteable' - ie, the people whose posts I will read no matter what.
This is probably because they were 'before my time'. I accept that.
In my eyes, Belldandy, Mr. Happy, and unknown kernal are noteable, because I like to read thier posts.
Thats just an example.
Basicly, I want to get this way of doing things across to the newer people. So I propose that the 'good' people on here take the words 'noteable', 'reguler', and 'newbie' out of thier posting vocabulery. That way we set a good example, by not discriminating at all.
If anyone asks why peoples names are in different colours, just say that we don't know, it's there for administrative purposes.
This is just an idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
Some of the older people, who should know better, still judge a persons worth by thier rank.
The best of the people here judge a person on what they have posted, not the colour of thier name. Personally, Sniper and Er-no are not what I consider to be 'noteable' - ie, the people whose posts I will read no matter what.
This is probably because they were 'before my time'. I accept that.
In my eyes, Belldandy, Mr. Happy, and unknown kernal are noteable, because I like to read thier posts.
Thats just an example.
Basicly, I want to get this way of doing things across to the newer people. So I propose that the 'good' people on here take the words 'noteable', 'reguler', and 'newbie' out of thier posting vocabulery. That way we set a good example, by not discriminating at all.
If anyone asks why peoples names are in different colours, just say that we don't know, it's there for administrative purposes.
This is just an idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
Page:
Damn.
Nevermind then.
Nevermind then.
I have been trying to bridge the void by posting the very best newbie topics in prime... some of them have even won GAD (would that have happened if they were allowed to de in Chat with not a single reply???).
Oh, and yes, some of the Notables must go ;)
Sonic
Oh, and yes, some of the Notables must go ;)
Sonic
Mouldy Cheese wrote:
This is just an
> idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
I'm afraid there is one: it sucks.
I'm sorry, I couldn't resist........
This is just an
> idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
I'm afraid there is one: it sucks.
I'm sorry, I couldn't resist........
Mouldy Cheese wrote:
This is just an
> idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
In the words of Blackadder himself:
'It's b******s'
:-D
This is just an
> idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
In the words of Blackadder himself:
'It's b******s'
:-D
A lot of the newer people here judge a persons worth by thier rank.
Some of the older people, who should know better, still judge a persons worth by thier rank.
The best of the people here judge a person on what they have posted, not the colour of thier name. Personally, Sniper and Er-no are not what I consider to be 'noteable' - ie, the people whose posts I will read no matter what.
This is probably because they were 'before my time'. I accept that.
In my eyes, Belldandy, Mr. Happy, and unknown kernal are noteable, because I like to read thier posts.
Thats just an example.
Basicly, I want to get this way of doing things across to the newer people. So I propose that the 'good' people on here take the words 'noteable', 'reguler', and 'newbie' out of thier posting vocabulery. That way we set a good example, by not discriminating at all.
If anyone asks why peoples names are in different colours, just say that we don't know, it's there for administrative purposes.
This is just an idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
Some of the older people, who should know better, still judge a persons worth by thier rank.
The best of the people here judge a person on what they have posted, not the colour of thier name. Personally, Sniper and Er-no are not what I consider to be 'noteable' - ie, the people whose posts I will read no matter what.
This is probably because they were 'before my time'. I accept that.
In my eyes, Belldandy, Mr. Happy, and unknown kernal are noteable, because I like to read thier posts.
Thats just an example.
Basicly, I want to get this way of doing things across to the newer people. So I propose that the 'good' people on here take the words 'noteable', 'reguler', and 'newbie' out of thier posting vocabulery. That way we set a good example, by not discriminating at all.
If anyone asks why peoples names are in different colours, just say that we don't know, it's there for administrative purposes.
This is just an idea. If there is a gaping flaw in it, please point it out to me.
Page: