Viewing Thread:
"Biggest conspiracy ever, you must read~!!!"

You remeber September the 11th? Well you may also remember that a plane crashed into the Pentaon. Now here is the tricky part, bear with me. My science teacher at school has noticed something rather strange about the whole Pentagon hitting thing. It was hit by a Boeing 747 which is a very big plane as you know. If the plane did hit the Pentagon why was there no plane reckage, dead bodies apart from the people in the building, or either a skid along the floor because the plane supposedly hit the first level of the building and it aint that high. Now, my science teacher put a projection of a Boeing outline onto a birdseye shot of the Pentagon and discovered that there was no wing damage on the building. So basically, what i'm trying to get across is that the Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane. Think about it, no viedos, no bodies, no plane reckage. What we think is that there was a rocket launched from the ground either by a terrorist or an American person to make Osama seem even more dangerous.

Think logically and read you fool, no skid on the floor, no plane reckage and no wing damage. There would've been a span of like 4 metres either side of the actual impact.

because it hit the building you fool. The pilot flew the plane into the building. Directly into the building. Planes collision have a habit of widening the blast area I imagine. It's not like sticking a knife through paper. It's not a clean incision. There was massive damage to the building, larger than the wingspan of the plane.

fine, if it was hit by a plane why was there no skid along the floor where the plane hit the lowest level of the building? Why was there no wing damage to either side of the main impact?????
Have you actually studied the pictures??

I'm sure that Goatboy is gonna love this topic.

I find it hard to believe that you can even say such a thing. Oh, those pictures in the papers were all made for show. In fact, it never happened. Osama Bin Laden is a nice guy. John F Kennedy is still alive. Man never landed on the Moon. World War 2 was a hoax.

God sake. Grow up and learn to understand more.

I've been to America on a school trip, to Washington DC in fact, two weeks after september 11th.

We drove past the pentagon and I filmed where it had been hit and I can assure you it was hit by a plane. There wee pieces being taken out. Believe me, a plane hit the pentagon. If you don't believe it then account for the missing passengers on that plane and the plane itself.. it's not like that plane has beeen found anywhere else.

The plane did not run along the ground first because someone flew it straight into the pentagon. If you were aiming for a building, you would hit at a downward angle and a plane's wings are actually quite far down the fusilage. So it's entirely plausible that only the front of the plane went into the building. Believe me Mr. Iraqistan; I have seen the building and a plane did hit it.

iraqistan man- i have come to the conclusion that you are either very gullible or very deluded. What is your obsession with terrorism. First of all telling us bollux about casualties in afghanistan and now rambling on about the pentagon not being hit by a plane. I tend to get my infomation from better sources than drunk tramps or the like.

Mouldy Cheese wrote:
> Sheepy or YH posted conspiciry theorys just after it happened, and no-one told
> them they were being morbid...

I didn't see those threads, but I can assure you, I would have said the exact thing if I would have.

Sheepy or YH posted conspiciry theorys just after it happened, and no-one told them they were being morbid...

So, um, where did the plane go then? Or did air traffic control etc just imagine the thing taking off, veering off course and crashing? What a load of pish!

I'll admit it, I'm normally one to come up with conspiracies, but this is far too morbid, even for me to post. I really don't believe that there is any foul play (exempt from the terrorist attacks) involve, and that a plane did indeed hit the Pentagon. For security reasons, I won't name them, but a user on these forums actually lost their uncle in the Pentagon attack, so I'd say that unless this particular user is very sick (and I don't he is or would say anything like that), that he wouldn't say that.

So, let's stop it with this propoganda, unless they'res some sort of sufficient proof. Like when I did a Bin Laden consiracy topic, I actually got pictures.