Viewing Thread:
"Biggest conspiracy ever, you must read~!!!"

You remeber September the 11th? Well you may also remember that a plane crashed into the Pentaon. Now here is the tricky part, bear with me. My science teacher at school has noticed something rather strange about the whole Pentagon hitting thing. It was hit by a Boeing 747 which is a very big plane as you know. If the plane did hit the Pentagon why was there no plane reckage, dead bodies apart from the people in the building, or either a skid along the floor because the plane supposedly hit the first level of the building and it aint that high. Now, my science teacher put a projection of a Boeing outline onto a birdseye shot of the Pentagon and discovered that there was no wing damage on the building. So basically, what i'm trying to get across is that the Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane. Think about it, no viedos, no bodies, no plane reckage. What we think is that there was a rocket launched from the ground either by a terrorist or an American person to make Osama seem even more dangerous.

A5hley wrote:
> if you think a plane wing is 4 metres long it is you who is the idiot

Did you even read what I said you remeadial, I said either side of the impact. Each wing is like 4 metres long. Now do you see how you made yourself seem stupid?

Why are you going on about sept 11 as though it is something we should look at for conspiracy theories?

Hundreds, no thousands of people died that day why would America try to cover up something like that? why would they cover up a missile attack by Bin Laden? As others have said how do you account for all the passengers on the plane? last time I looked missiles didn't carry passengers, and there were dead passengers.

sept 11 affected everyone in different ways I know where I live we were all getting ready to sign up if this turned into full scale war it's how it affected us.

It's wrong to talk about it being a conspiracy.

Exactly what everyone else has said,
But seeing as though he keeps on asking about "where did the plane go then"
eeeerrrrrrr....... do you not realise that it wouldve blown up into millions of pieces and caught fire?

fire.......... burns............ airoplane.......... ashes.

you and your teacher are fools!

I'm with the others, if this was all a hoax, then where is the plane, where are the passengers, and how would a terrorist get within firing range of the pentagon!? A conspiracy? Kennedy may be alive, WW2 may have been a hoax, but a plane did hit the Pentagon, and hundreds died because of it. Your science teacher is pulling your leg, I think here mate. Print this off and show him all the replies it got, watch in great delight as he tries to use his knowledge to wriggle his way out of it! :D

Let's let this go, it's doing my head in and is rather depressing.

that clearly should have been uninformed but looks quite funny anyway

iraqistan man is clearly an uniformed fool and i don't know why we are justifying is crap argument with replies.

Iraqistan Man wrote:
> Think logically and read you fool, no skid on the floor, no plane reckage and no
> wing damage. There would've been a span of like 4 metres either side of the
> actual impact.

THE BLAST AREA IS LARGER THAN A PLANE WINGSPAN!!!

do you understand? I have seen it. The hole in the side of the pentagon is massive. It is larger than a plane's wingspan. That is why.

There is no skid because the plane did not skid along the floor. It flew into the building without skidding. The plane hit the building directly. Plane into building. No plane into grass. Plane hit building hit plane hit building.

Did you see the wreckage from the WTC? Nope because they took it away. They were taking pieces of plane out of the Pentagon when I was there, though, so I can assure you that a plane went into there. Yes into the building. Picture a big plane flying straight into the top of a building. The pentagon is extremely high, it's not the height of your house; it's a large building. It is entirely plausible for a plane to hit it directly without skidding first. Plane hit building causing bigger damage than the size of the plane hence no wing marks because the plane caused a larger blast are than it's own wing span.

There! Satisfied!

How do you account for the lost plane then? And the people that lost their lives on the plane? All made up eh?

Anyway, this is just envoking emotions that I hadn't experienced in a while. I'll always remember September 11th because of the people that died, but to be honest, I don't want the picture of the planes hitting buildings in my mind thank you very much. Maybe this would be a little more appreciated in maybe a few years, but it is still extremely close to the bone at the moment, so do us all a favour and let it drop.

if you think a plane wing is 4 metres long it is you who is the idiot