The "Xbox Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Interesting topic title eh? Well, despite the fact that I`ve never played Halo, I`m fairly sure (from reading reviews) that my topic statement is completely incorrect. However, it would seem digitiser disagree...
Halo - 4/5
I stared at the screen in complete disbelief this morning, as I couldn`t believe that digitiser were that stupid. I knew they were bad... but this took the biscuit.
As the potential scores are 0,1,2,3,4,5 there are 6 categories, and so a 4/5 is in the range 66.6 to 83.3. For a start, this is a huge range, which just goes to show how pointless digitiser`s reviews are, but did any of you think that Halo should only get in the 70s?
Halo - 4/5
I stared at the screen in complete disbelief this morning, as I couldn`t believe that digitiser were that stupid. I knew they were bad... but this took the biscuit.
As the potential scores are 0,1,2,3,4,5 there are 6 categories, and so a 4/5 is in the range 66.6 to 83.3. For a start, this is a huge range, which just goes to show how pointless digitiser`s reviews are, but did any of you think that Halo should only get in the 70s?
Page:
or plain stupid...
ive heard someone list a message on these forums saying that Halo is better than MGS 2 - I assume they were drunk!
GrimMetal wrote:
...Superb game but the 1
> player is too easy. Whoop dee doo! They praise the multiplayer, the graphics and
> the sound and the xbox controller. What more do you want?
That's because you are playing it on easy. The whole point is that you play through on easy so you get to know your way around, then ramp up the difficulty for a real challenge.
HALO on the hardest setting is very hard.
...Superb game but the 1
> player is too easy. Whoop dee doo! They praise the multiplayer, the graphics and
> the sound and the xbox controller. What more do you want?
That's because you are playing it on easy. The whole point is that you play through on easy so you get to know your way around, then ramp up the difficulty for a real challenge.
HALO on the hardest setting is very hard.
Calm down. Digitizer is in fact a good source of news and previews. Ignore the score and go by how they describe the game. That way you can make up your own mind. Digitizer once said they wanted to do away with review scores and I can see why! You did actually read the review didnt you? Superb game but the 1 player is too easy. Whoop dee doo! They praise the multiplayer, the graphics and the sound and the xbox controller. What more do you want?
Interesting topic title eh? Well, despite the fact that I`ve never played Halo, I`m fairly sure (from reading reviews) that my topic statement is completely incorrect. However, it would seem digitiser disagree...
Halo - 4/5
I stared at the screen in complete disbelief this morning, as I couldn`t believe that digitiser were that stupid. I knew they were bad... but this took the biscuit.
As the potential scores are 0,1,2,3,4,5 there are 6 categories, and so a 4/5 is in the range 66.6 to 83.3. For a start, this is a huge range, which just goes to show how pointless digitiser`s reviews are, but did any of you think that Halo should only get in the 70s?
Halo - 4/5
I stared at the screen in complete disbelief this morning, as I couldn`t believe that digitiser were that stupid. I knew they were bad... but this took the biscuit.
As the potential scores are 0,1,2,3,4,5 there are 6 categories, and so a 4/5 is in the range 66.6 to 83.3. For a start, this is a huge range, which just goes to show how pointless digitiser`s reviews are, but did any of you think that Halo should only get in the 70s?
Page: