Viewing Thread:
"Do not reward the biased like grix reward the open minded like Ant, Arty and Dan"

come on SR. Cop yourself on!

How did we ever reach the big 60?

I hate FMV. (Yes, whats most annoying is when they only show FMV for adverts, IT MAKES ME WANT TO KILL SOMEONE!!) You really need help brain.
Anywho, yes, the PS2's graphics will improve, as will the Gamecube, X-Box and Dreamcast (not at its potential yet...). So, when the PS2 seems to catch up with the Gamecube, the Gamecube itself will improve, and PS2 will get left behind with graphics again.
Graphics aren't everything anyway, but its nice to be able to play a slick-slidingly smooth game (slick-slidingly?) with crisp detail and graphics. I wasn't moaning at the quality of FMV anyway, it looks really good, but I just hate it, for it is not what games are made for.

you have to consider that ps2 only started making these games and have probably not yet reached it's fuul potential. Apart from mgs2 other games grapghics are very good but could improve a lot more.
Fmv's are fantastic but the in-game movies aren't really affected by the number of pixels there are. As in ps1 ...final fantasy..for example..some fmv's on other consoles would probably just be like it and no better...

"with all of your people who-doesnt-like-it smelling"

I really don't like a console that smells, it does put me off whe playing games...
But anyway, the PS2 has adequete graphics compared to, saaaayyyy, the Gamecube, and at the mo, some on the Dreamcast.
Yes, some games on the Dreamcast look better than some on the PS2 at the moment.
(And don't YOU DARE get me started on FMV....)

Dan wrote:
> *thankyou.
> Hi Arty nice to see you again! I haven't heard anything from you
> for ages!
Alright Dan, still ain't got that DC, soon will though talk to you soon.ARTY

*thankyou.
Hi Arty nice to see you again! I haven't heard anything from you for ages!

Fogmaster wrote:
,
ARTY does the same about the PS2,
Do I!!!, I've always maintained that all consoles have their good and bad points.Show me where I've done otherwise, and I'll go along with you're point!!!!!Otherwise get you're facts right.Anyway, I've had more than my fair share of free-b's from SR, so please show no concern for me, thanyou.

HUH? The Playstation 2's graphical capabilities are very impressive - apparently, if you have seen the video sequences and alledged game footage of games like Metal gear Solid 2 and GT3 then you may be forgiven for thinking that all the games on the format will have brilliant graphics - not that the graphics are the most important aspect of a game anyway! As the first Playstation 2 titles are released here you will soon see that the console is in it's 'early age' in that the in game graphics are not particularly great - you could think that the game was a playstation title - At present the Dreamcast has great looking games AND games which are involving and genuinely provide good gameplay.
I'd like to see how the pre-ordering public react when they find that Tekken Tag really is a lump of absolute **** and that it not only looks poor - it plays awfully too. Also Ridge Racer 5 is actually the most under achieving PS2 game to date.

IT'S NOT satisfactory...it's the best...is like saying..
ITS NOT GOOD....it's excellent.....get it?

Find 'adequate' in the dictionary, you said the PS2's graphics were NOT adequate, then you said you loved it about three times, find out what we mean, you don't have to be a rocket scientist.