The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
We have 12 notables. All are fine posters, and deserve their position. (Well done to YH for getting the recent position as notable)
However, what next? Does it get to the point where there are so many notables that even hopeless posters that can`t put a decent topic together (like myself with this topic as an example) get elected by default (being the only regular left).
Also, who wants to be Notable #13?
Anyway, just a thought, and perhaps something that should be considered before the next election. It would keep the 12 notables special.
If Your Honour is the only notable made this time round... then thats fine, however, it`d be the first time an election had resulted in only one notable (I think, though I haven`t been around for many of the elections).
Anyway, if its only going to be a few more, then that`ll probably be fine... as long as there is some sort of limit. However, there is still the question of Notable #13 - who wants to be unlucky? :-)
> Kid Rock wrote:
> what about the notable relegation thing? that is a good
> idea because since the
> notables have been elected 90% of them havent done
> any thing decent
Now that's untrue.
I agree. Taking away what they truly deserve is not justice in any way, shape or form. They became Notables for a reason, that their contributions to the forums were oustanding more so than the rest of the posters, and to strip them of this title is not just mean, but a down-right slap in the face and I would find it insulting.
> I see it as a Pulp Fiction/Babe: Pig in the City crossover. Directed by Paul
> Verhoeven.
Let me just hold that thought for a second...
*shudders*
FM: Living on the edge.
...unlike Tony. Sir.