The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I want names of notables, and I want proof, backing these statements up.
If I don't get these, I am going to work my backside off getting you banned. You do NOT accuse people of doing things they haven't done, wherever you are on Earth.
"Unlike certain members on here who admitantly wont read certain members posts because they're by those particular members, I'll read anyone's posts if they are of any iterest to me."
"I don't judge by username, I judge by the quality of the topic and it's contents."
You sound like Miss Funning World.
"And Grix, your running commentary of a Batman film cheered me up no end on a day when I had mountains of homework and was getting worked up. It made me go and watch Batman Returns and not do the homework at all, which took a massive weight off my shoulders :-)"
That's going to keep me smiling all week. Excellent! :0D
Some posts make me laugh, some make me mad and others make me despair for my future if some of you ever attain positions of power.
But at the end of the day, it's just a forum with some words.
I don't expect anyone to read my crap anymore than I read other people.
I just post what I want and don't worry about if anyone gets it or likes it.
>Now, there are others (and I wont name names) that
> I
> never, ever read because they are dull, dry posts with nothing to add of
> any
> value. Be it serious discussion or humour.
Some notable-wannabes
> shouldn't be
> thinking about it, learn to type properly and have a
> point.
So does that mean you wouldn't read anything I post? I think I'm gonna side with Edgy here. Notables should be the ones setting the examples and helping members along, not just ignoring them!
> Goatboy, are you really that ignorant that you refuse to read other people's
> post's because that person has not entertained you before. Well, how do you know
> they won't entertain you if you don't read there stuff more than once?
Ice Blaster, there's no point in asking this. He probably wont read it anyway....
On a serious note, can you imagine what would happen if the staff who check GAD's were like that?
I don't judge by username, I judge by the quality of the topic and it's contents.
> mrhappy because he writes about movies as passionately as I do. Ok,
> he's a bit poncy with his foreign movies, but I still value his opinion and will
> always read his stuff.
cheers (I think)
*goes off to watch obscure and thus brilliant Polish silent film shot on Super 8 cameras with the contrast turned up to full so you can't actually see anything*
(joke :-)
Stryke because he never gave up when I was harassing him about being a beardy no-mates and gave it back just as good as he got. I respect that 100%.
--
Cheers, but it's fun arguing with you, because you're one of the few people who won't take it personally, and immediately bombard on MSN saying "WHY? STRYKE? WHY? I fought we were friends!"