The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
;-)
I don't come on to this site to win, I come on it to talk with people I class as friends. And after a few days of your arrival, you accused one of my mates of copying a review, even though it has been proved that he didn't.
You said after looking at it carefully, you dismissed the case? Shouldn't you look at it carefully before you start throwing all your accusations around?
> Well, you ain't been back long, and you have already accused two respected
> notables of copying reviews.
I've claimed that ONE Notable has copied, but after looking at it carefully, I have dismissed the case.
And you wonder why no one likes you?
Look Atomic Kaola, you've copied many reviews in the past, and people forgave you, so try not and act as ignorant as you are implying. I thought you were a decent poster (despite the copying) and I hope you can keep that as Gabbo :)
I'd give Stryke a game of Chess anyday.
And lose, most likely.
And you wonder why no one likes you?
But be warned if they do I shall be taking legal action. : )
> Lol!
Having looked at both posts, RBS's is 6/2001 while this other geezer
> "martinwright" wrote in 7/2001.
Rasta's post came first!
Now
> unless they BOTH copied from another source, I think that it's more likely that
> "martinwright" copied our notable friend.
The damn dirty
> scumbag!
Shaneo, you caught a cheat, but he wasn't a notable!! :-D
Gah! What a twist in the story! It looks like Rasta has been "aquitted", unless they both copied the same review, which is damn unlikely. It's wierd that "martinwright" was not caught by other Ciao!ers for copying from the SR site, as all SR reviews are submitted to search engines.