The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Star Fox Adventures'.
Been thinking about this for a while now, and I can say this is a very overlooked game.
Its great fun to play and sadly looks as if it has been overlooked by the masses who buy such CRAP like TheSims.
Anyways, I am going to put my er-proval on it.
Anyone who doesn't own Starfox Adventures. Give it a go!
Its great fun to play and sadly looks as if it has been overlooked by the masses who buy such CRAP like TheSims.
Anyways, I am going to put my er-proval on it.
Anyone who doesn't own Starfox Adventures. Give it a go!
Page:
i think i will end the arguement by saying this game rocks, and anyone that wants to disagree with me...i'll see you outside in 5 minuites.
And how can you say that "the simple performance of tasks" takes 13 hours FOR EVERYONE? Have you watched every owner of the game play through it?
Have you, 'eckers.
Have you, 'eckers.
I couldn't give a monkey's how long either of you took to complete it.
I haven't even looked to see how long it took me!
All I care about is the fact I enjoyed the game - and probably will when I play it a second time around!
I haven't even looked to see how long it took me!
All I care about is the fact I enjoyed the game - and probably will when I play it a second time around!
Exploring what?
The secret areas are merely small rooms containing stupid wells, which Prince Bloody Tricky brings your attention to every time you come accross one.
The secret areas are merely small rooms containing stupid wells, which Prince Bloody Tricky brings your attention to every time you come accross one.
gerrid wrote:
> Dark Mark™ wrote:
> So what if it did? It would probably take me longer.
>
> It's just that the simple performance of tasks takes about 13 hours,
> leaving him with arounf 9 hours of actually doing nothing.
*
Exploring? The usual activity in a competent adventure game?
Twang!
> Dark Mark™ wrote:
> So what if it did? It would probably take me longer.
>
> It's just that the simple performance of tasks takes about 13 hours,
> leaving him with arounf 9 hours of actually doing nothing.
*
Exploring? The usual activity in a competent adventure game?
Twang!
Dark Mark™ wrote:
> So what if it did? It would probably take me longer.
It's just that the simple performance of tasks takes about 13 hours, leaving him with arounf 9 hours of actually doing nothing.
> So what if it did? It would probably take me longer.
It's just that the simple performance of tasks takes about 13 hours, leaving him with arounf 9 hours of actually doing nothing.
gerrid wrote:
> I don't know how it took you 22 hours, honestly.
*
So what if it did? It would probably take me longer.
> I don't know how it took you 22 hours, honestly.
*
So what if it did? It would probably take me longer.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Very well. But there's no denying the worlds were very imaginative,
> and the tasks extremely varied.
Maybe they were varied, but not very much. Ot was basically all get 'this barell here' or 'shoot this target'. There was some variation, like mazes, but not very much. And the worlds looked nice, but they're nothing that hasnt been done before
> I'm not rubbish. I'm actually very good at action/adventure games.
> It's not how long it takes you, it's how well you do it.
How could I possibly have done it less well than you? I completed the game, got 99%, I just didnt spend half my time standing around or choosing what to buy in that stupid shop. Or asking stupid slippy for help.
I don't know how it took you 22 hours, honestly.
> Very well. But there's no denying the worlds were very imaginative,
> and the tasks extremely varied.
Maybe they were varied, but not very much. Ot was basically all get 'this barell here' or 'shoot this target'. There was some variation, like mazes, but not very much. And the worlds looked nice, but they're nothing that hasnt been done before
> I'm not rubbish. I'm actually very good at action/adventure games.
> It's not how long it takes you, it's how well you do it.
How could I possibly have done it less well than you? I completed the game, got 99%, I just didnt spend half my time standing around or choosing what to buy in that stupid shop. Or asking stupid slippy for help.
I don't know how it took you 22 hours, honestly.
gerrid wrote:
> I can say it wasnt great fun first time round. Easily. Some parts
> could be described as enjoyable, and these were the parts that
> reminded me of Zelda, like the cove with the big necked dinosaur. The
> rest of the game was tedious at best, especially the boss battles.
Very well. But there's no denying the worlds were very imaginative, and the tasks extremely varied.
> And if it took you 22 hours to be thorough, you are rubbish, as I got
> 99% in 15 hours. And I wasn't exactly speeding through it.
I'm not rubbish. I'm actually very good at action/adventure games. It's not how long it takes you, it's how well you do it.
> I can say it wasnt great fun first time round. Easily. Some parts
> could be described as enjoyable, and these were the parts that
> reminded me of Zelda, like the cove with the big necked dinosaur. The
> rest of the game was tedious at best, especially the boss battles.
Very well. But there's no denying the worlds were very imaginative, and the tasks extremely varied.
> And if it took you 22 hours to be thorough, you are rubbish, as I got
> 99% in 15 hours. And I wasn't exactly speeding through it.
I'm not rubbish. I'm actually very good at action/adventure games. It's not how long it takes you, it's how well you do it.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Needless to say, no matter how much you want to hate it, no-one can
> deny it was great, addictive fun the first time round. Took me about
> 22 hours, so it's got a decent life span.
I can say it wasnt great fun first time round. Easily. Some parts could be described as enjoyable, and these were the parts that reminded me of Zelda, like the cove with the big necked dinosaur. The rest of the game was tedious at best, especially the boss battles.
And if it took you 22 hours to be thorough, you are rubbish, as I got 99% in 15 hours. And I wasn't exactly speeding through it.
> Needless to say, no matter how much you want to hate it, no-one can
> deny it was great, addictive fun the first time round. Took me about
> 22 hours, so it's got a decent life span.
I can say it wasnt great fun first time round. Easily. Some parts could be described as enjoyable, and these were the parts that reminded me of Zelda, like the cove with the big necked dinosaur. The rest of the game was tedious at best, especially the boss battles.
And if it took you 22 hours to be thorough, you are rubbish, as I got 99% in 15 hours. And I wasn't exactly speeding through it.
Page: