The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Flicking through the latest issue (in Smiths) I noticed these scores...
Tony Hawks 3 - 7/10
SSX Tricky - 7/10
MGS2 - 8/10
Are they always this harsh with every console/review ?
What do they want for their money ?
Tony Hawks 3 - 7/10
SSX Tricky - 7/10
MGS2 - 8/10
Are they always this harsh with every console/review ?
What do they want for their money ?
Page:
The Playstation2 is only in it's second year, if todays titles were perfect 10's, then there would be no room for improvement on that platform, and we all know that games get better on a system until the day it dies, and the next one comes along.
A PS2 title that scores 8/10 is no doubt a better game than a Sega Master System game that scored 8/10 a decade ago.
A PS2 title that scores 8/10 is no doubt a better game than a Sega Master System game that scored 8/10 a decade ago.
Maybe they are just telling it like it is..
That's what I thought, I assume Halo got 9 or 10 out of ten.
Ginger wrote:
>Why doesn't edge magazine like the PS2
Because they're too busy kissing Microsoft's big behind :-)
>Why doesn't edge magazine like the PS2
Because they're too busy kissing Microsoft's big behind :-)
Flicking through the latest issue (in Smiths) I noticed these scores...
Tony Hawks 3 - 7/10
SSX Tricky - 7/10
MGS2 - 8/10
Are they always this harsh with every console/review ?
What do they want for their money ?
Tony Hawks 3 - 7/10
SSX Tricky - 7/10
MGS2 - 8/10
Are they always this harsh with every console/review ?
What do they want for their money ?
Page: