The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
i'm talking about the divorce of michael jordan and his missus. she wants half of his 330 million pound fortune and all i can say is why in the hell does she even deserve to get a damn penny or the family house or even the kids.
now let's see who was it that was setting the NBA alight with his breathtaking gravity defying dunks and last second winning shots. who was it who got all those sponsorship deals due to his talent. now to my recollection it wasn't juanita jordan but it was Michael Jordan. HE'S earned ALL that money HIMSELF due to HIS talent so that money is HIS he's earned it so he should keep it. but of course due to equality *scoffs at that little phrase* she's able to claim half of a fortune which her husband has worked hard for himself and earned all by himself. while he's earned all that money she's just been sitting her fat behind on the sofa watching day time soaps until michael comes home with another bundle of sponsorship cash which she'd probably spend in about 2 minutes of him opening the door.
now is he able to claim half of her fortune............oh wait my bad she hasn't got a fortune seeing as she's been leading the life of lady muck while old MJ has to go and work hard to feed his family and keep a roof over their heads. she's saying she needs that money to maintain the life she's accustomed to? well MJ gave her that life she didn't earn it herself so why should she be allowed to keep living it? and also MJ should get the kids seeing as he's the one with a stable job bringing in all the money while mrs jordan feeds her fat face watching ricki lake on the tv.
this is just the feminists getting their own way with their special brand of equality. the type of equality which is just a little bit more equal on the side of the fairer sex. now i'll probably get some feminists ooooh your a sexist pig all i say to that is thank you cause that just means i'm right cause if that's all you can say that means you know i'm right you just can't admit it or think of something to counteract my argument
now let's see who was it that was setting the NBA alight with his breathtaking gravity defying dunks and last second winning shots. who was it who got all those sponsorship deals due to his talent. now to my recollection it wasn't juanita jordan but it was Michael Jordan. HE'S earned ALL that money HIMSELF due to HIS talent so that money is HIS he's earned it so he should keep it. but of course due to equality *scoffs at that little phrase* she's able to claim half of a fortune which her husband has worked hard for himself and earned all by himself. while he's earned all that money she's just been sitting her fat behind on the sofa watching day time soaps until michael comes home with another bundle of sponsorship cash which she'd probably spend in about 2 minutes of him opening the door.
now is he able to claim half of her fortune............oh wait my bad she hasn't got a fortune seeing as she's been leading the life of lady muck while old MJ has to go and work hard to feed his family and keep a roof over their heads. she's saying she needs that money to maintain the life she's accustomed to? well MJ gave her that life she didn't earn it herself so why should she be allowed to keep living it? and also MJ should get the kids seeing as he's the one with a stable job bringing in all the money while mrs jordan feeds her fat face watching ricki lake on the tv.
this is just the feminists getting their own way with their special brand of equality. the type of equality which is just a little bit more equal on the side of the fairer sex. now i'll probably get some feminists ooooh your a sexist pig all i say to that is thank you cause that just means i'm right cause if that's all you can say that means you know i'm right you just can't admit it or think of something to counteract my argument
Page:
yet when i look at your honours post i'm wondering, well if a woman can cheat on her husband and STILL get half his possessions then why can't MJ keep his fortune which he has worked hard for? all that money was generated from his talent. i didn't see juanita jordan slam dunking time after time in NBA matches winning championship after championship.
FPr what its worth...Jordans wife has been saying that Jordan has been cheating on her with more than one woman.
whats wrong with being sexy...?
Fair enough, no offence meant.
And for what it's worth, I agree
And for what it's worth, I agree
goatboy this is a post about michael jordan and his divorce proceedings not *let's check ben hodgetts' grammar* now last time i checked this was not an english exam paper i'm not being marked for correct grammar, punctuation and spelling so quite frankly i don't care if certain things in my post are grammatically wrong as long as people understand it. now your honour seems to have understood my message it's just you trying to be picky for no good reason. so unless you do actually have something to say on MJ and his divorce proceedings would you kindly mind just being quiet and annoying someone else by trying to correct their grammar or unless you have something to add to the topic that has relevance to the original post then by all means post.
i'm not being funny or trying to find an argument i just found reading about this subject particularly annoying so i made a post about it i don't want it to be degraded into a *you got this wrong, there should be a full stop there* type of post
i'm not being funny or trying to find an argument i just found reading about this subject particularly annoying so i made a post about it i don't want it to be degraded into a *you got this wrong, there should be a full stop there* type of post
Ben Hodgetts wrote:
> sorry didn't know i had to put it in simple terms
now i'll probably get some
> feminists say to my post "ooooh your a sexist pig"
all i say to that
> is "thank you because if that's the only response you can give to my post
> it just means my points were valid and you couldn't make a argument against
> them"
---
If you're going to try and be a smartass, at least get your post correct, it should be:
Now, I'll probably get some feminists say to my post, "Ooooh you're a sexist pig", all I say to that is:
"Thank you", because if that's the only response you can give to my post? It just means my points were valid and you couldn't make an argument against them.
> sorry didn't know i had to put it in simple terms
now i'll probably get some
> feminists say to my post "ooooh your a sexist pig"
all i say to that
> is "thank you because if that's the only response you can give to my post
> it just means my points were valid and you couldn't make a argument against
> them"
---
If you're going to try and be a smartass, at least get your post correct, it should be:
Now, I'll probably get some feminists say to my post, "Ooooh you're a sexist pig", all I say to that is:
"Thank you", because if that's the only response you can give to my post? It just means my points were valid and you couldn't make an argument against them.
hey your honour man i guess this is the equality those feminists keep talking about. you see they want equality in things they get the worse treatment in like wages but don't actually bother to address the issues where they have the upper hand in like custody of children and the divorce settlements. i guess this is what they mean by equality - we want equal rights in things we've been downtrodden in over the years but in areas where we have the advantage that's just fine we'll keep it the way it is and if any man disagrees with us he's a sexist pig.
sorry didn't know i had to put it in simple terms
now i'll probably get some feminists say to my post "ooooh your a sexist pig"
all i say to that is "thank you because if that's the only response you can give to my post it just means my points were valid and you couldn't make a argument against them"
now i'll probably get some feminists say to my post "ooooh your a sexist pig"
all i say to that is "thank you because if that's the only response you can give to my post it just means my points were valid and you couldn't make a argument against them"
You think that's bad, listen to this:
My mate is married with two young kids, young as in 4 and 1 I think.
His missus cheats on him. BUT if he goes for divorce, she gets the house, the kids and him paying maintainence until the kids are 18.
Excuse me?!
Bearing in mind that he is a mature student, studying full time and has no money anyway. He then has to leave his house, his kids, and pay her money for the next 14 years. When SHE cheated on HIM.
That sucks.
My mate is married with two young kids, young as in 4 and 1 I think.
His missus cheats on him. BUT if he goes for divorce, she gets the house, the kids and him paying maintainence until the kids are 18.
Excuse me?!
Bearing in mind that he is a mature student, studying full time and has no money anyway. He then has to leave his house, his kids, and pay her money for the next 14 years. When SHE cheated on HIM.
That sucks.
Page: