GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Why i think Jerry Bruckheimer is the source of all poop films"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Tue 08/01/02 at 20:34
Regular
Posts: 787
Here is a little info i found on Bruckheimer that proves he is the worst man in Hollywood to ever have anything to do with a film.

Armageddon
Pearl Harbour
Gone In Sixty Seconds
Con Air
Days of Thunder
Flashdance
Dangerous Minds
Coyote Ugly

All of these were box office flops in some form or another. Sure;y Bruckheimer must be sleeping with someone to carry on getting work. Lets just hope that he does not jinx Black Hawk Dawn.

And due to his connections, Bruckheimer is also linked in some form or another to other works of fart such as;

Willow (Starred Warwick Davis, who starred alongside Coolio
(who was in Dangerous Minds)

Being John Malkovich (Is based around two of his stars from
(Con Air-John Cusak and DUH! John Malkovich)

Kalifornia (Directed by Domonic Sena who worked on Gone in
(sixty seconds with Bruckheimer)

And X-files the movie (starred David Duchovny who starred in
(Kalifornia)
Wed 09/01/02 at 09:08
Regular
Posts: 16,548
Stranger In Paradise wrote:

Kevin
> Smith - Chasing Amy was great, Clerks and Mall Rats not so and Dogma had a great
> story but was lost amongst the swearing nearly every other
> word.

--

Off you trot now. Dogma has been the best of K Smith's film, for the scale and audacity of it. Plus it's very funny. Very very funny.

--


Ridley Scott - Bladerunner is okay but why
> theres so much fuss about it I'll never know.

--

When you decide to actually WATCH the films, let me know.
Tue 08/01/02 at 23:12
Regular
Posts: 21,800
How can you say this? granted Bruckheimer's recent films have been crap, but with films like Con Air and The Rock behind his belt, he really is not the source of all poop films.
Tue 08/01/02 at 22:54
Regular
"Look!!! Changed!!!1"
Posts: 2,072
Stranger In Paradise wrote:

Cameron
> Crowe - Almost Famous - his latest I believe - looks
> like it so wanted to be the modern Waynes World but is actually over long and
> tedious with no real surprises.


You sure you watched the right film? Almost Famous is nothing like Wayne's World other than they both feature young blokes trying to break into the music business - a tenuious link as they deal with vaguely similar subject in totally different styles. Almost Famous is a good old comming of age movie, Wayne's World is a comedy that the modern teen gross out flicks owe a small debt to.
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:39
Posts: 0
John Woo made great films such as Hard Boiled and The Killer. He made an Impact on Hollywood with M:I-2 and Face Off.

Carpenter is responsible for Halloween and Assault on Precinct13.

Copolla gave us THE GODFATHER and APOCOLYPSE NOW

De Palma made Scarface and (COUGH, CHOKE) Mission: Impossible
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:36
Posts: 0
Dogma- i will give you that
Mallrats and Clerks- Cult Classics


Almost Famous- A great film, if only cos it has a Boogie Nights feel about it. And Vanilla Sky looks great


Blade Runner- Yet another cult classic, Ford at his peak.
Scott also bought us the greats such as Gladiator and Alien
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:30
Posts: 0
WEll I've not seen films by all of them but of the ones Ive seen;


Kevin Smith - Chasing Amy was great, Clerks and Mall Rats not so and Dogma had a great story but was lost amongst the swearing nearly every other word.


Cameron
> Crowe - Almost Famous - his latest I believe - looks like it so wanted to be the modern Waynes World but is actually over long and tedious with no real surprises.


Ridley Scott - Bladerunner is okay but why theres so much fuss about it I'll never know.

Im not sure about the others who I may have seen films of but dont know for sure so I wont comment.
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:26
Posts: 0
You wanna know who i do like?

ok;
John Woo
Kevin Smith
Cameron Crowe
Ridley Scott
Francis Ford Copolla
John Carpenter (up until 1990)
Brian De Palma
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:20
Posts: 0
BradW wrote:
> You can't prove anything with the Spilberg arguement. because he, like Lucas,
> has obviously lost the plot.

So if you say Lucas and Spielberg have lost the plot, and Bruckenheimer, then whose films do you like ? Kevin SMith could be good if only he'd lose the swearing fixation.

>Lucas just has to
> stop thinking commercially and go back to his roots, lets >just hope Ep2 is much
> ,much ,much better that Ep1

Well after EP1 that shouldnt be hard....how about title screen then roll to end credits lol :) Joking.... hopefully it will be better, still theres "two towers" to look forward to.
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:17
Posts: 0
God helps us if that happens!!
what on EARTH was he thinking when he created Jar Jar!!!

"i know lets have an annoying rasta dog/lizard thing on ten kilos of speed and heroine!!"
Tue 08/01/02 at 21:13
Regular
"Trout a la creme"
Posts: 2,858
I heard that by episode 3 things will get "darker" as young skywalker turns to the darkside. So it may be possible that it will not be a film aimed at a younger audience, or it will be the story of how jar jar binks gets married, has children and moves off of the planet alderan to live hapilly ever after, followed up by jar jar babies cartoon.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Very pleased
Very pleased with the help given by your staff. They explained technical details in an easy way and were patient when providing information to a non expert like me.
Excellent support service!
I have always found the support staff to provide an excellent service on every occasion I've called.
Ben

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.