The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The biggest problem with the PS2 is graphics. When it was released we were promised graphics to wet our pants/knickers over. When i saw the opening video for Smackdwon 3, that was exactly what i did (only joking). But if any one has been bothered to watch the opening vid to Smackdown 3 they will know what i mean. The graphics are stunning! they look almost real. When i pressed start and was greated by a very tacky Michael Cole introduction i started to cry. The graphics in game where OK, but nothing compared to the video.
I know that game developers struggle to make the in game graphics as good as the opening and in game vids, but why bother? Why not just concentrate more on the in game graphics and less on the vids.
Don't get me wrong. I admire the great work that is involved in game making, and i feel that the PS2 has made a great improvement on game systems in the European market. With consoles such as N64 and Dreamcast leaving me lying awake at night wondering why anyone would release such...t**d consoles.
Max Payne is a game that i have played on the PC and loved. Now it is coming to the PS2 in a week. Hail to the lord!!! or should i? from what i've heard the PS2 version of Max Payne does the PC and XBOX versions great injustice. Obviously i will buy it any way (Nothing beats the Matrix/John Woo style game play. I get to be Chow Yun Fat and Neo at the same time, YIPPEE!!) but if the game is as bad as every one says, i will be very disheartened.
With games such as MGS2 and Stuntman making an apperance on the market soon, perhaps the PS2 still has chance. But if Sony don't pull their fingers out, then i can see a certain company having to re-think the whole console thing.
If any one has anything to say, good or bad, please feel free to reply to my post.
Tah! Brad
MG2 does look very promising! but why did Smackdown 3's programmers waste such a promising prospect with poopy graphics. The idea of the 3rd SD installment on the PS2 with its "great graphics" promised to be a great looking game with all our fave wrestlers looking their best. The opening video was this and more. But the game looked only half decent.
Maybe i am expecting too much, but then someone must have given me the idea that PS2 was going to be the best :) Damn those marketing geniuses!!!
However, I thought the graphics were good, even if the intro sequence's looked better-after all, they always do.
And I think they're not using the full capability yet because they actually can't...they need to get 'used' to it, if you know what I mean.
Look at the PlayStation, from Ridge Racer all the way to Gran Turismo 2. Big difference, on the same console.
With games such as Tarzan and Mummy Returns shaming the console, i can only see a small future for the PS2 at the moment. Hopefully games such as MGS2 will save it. I hope so, because i have spent quite alot on the PS2 so far and have yet to be pleased.
GTA3 was a step in the right direction, but like many PS2 games at the moment. It only has a life of about 2 months for most people.
Please Sony! Give us an ultimate game!! (something that is a combination of MAX PAYNE, MGS, GTA3 and the original Tony Hawk)
Sony have already got a very large fan-base and it's unlikely that either of the rival consoles, despite their capabilities, can attract enough people to make Microsoft or Nintendo overcome the mountain that is Sony Computer Entertainment.
I don't necessarily agree with this, but it's definately a war that relies heavily on pre-established audience's and marketing campaigns, and, everyone knows how successful the first PS1 was.
successful the first PS1 was.
Should have read, MORE JUSTIFIED ASKING IF...
GTA3 was a step in the right
> direction, but like many PS2 games at the moment. It only has a life of about 2
> months for most people.
Personally, 2 months is long enough for me. I'll have a new game by then (hopefully) which I'll want to play.
Although, games like Red Faction and Smackdown JBI I keep coming back to, mainly because of the mutliplayer. Surely that means Red Faction has lasted months?
And to be honest, I fail to see much that Nintendo can offer that will last for over 2 months. I wouldn't touch Star Fox with a barge pole, Luigi's Mansion is suposedly repetitive and...well, there's not all that much else at the moment.
> I agree that Nintendo is a dying breed. They have yet to get their next
> Goldeneye. But the worry for me is that PS2 has made a promise that they have
> yet to keep; great graphics
Oh and your an authority on games huh? As if you know ANYTHING about Sony's promises.
No-one guarenteed the very best from the console immediately, now get lost and go back to your bloody films!
(ps, how the hell'd ya' know that was me?)
[no-one flame me for this, it's not meant to be taken seriously!]