The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If the notable votes were now, who would you be voting for?
I know they are not here for about 2 months but just at this moment in time who has your vote?
I know they are not here for about 2 months but just at this moment in time who has your vote?
Page:
CDouch wrote:
> You can vote for yourself cant you?
I dont think I have seen anyone do it
> though
I don't think so, but you could try.
I accept your apology with open doors, but unfortunately, I don't have any doors, or a bar, although I would like one in a few years time...
If you still think I stink then post a topic "DON'T VOTE FOR STINKY DAN2K1!"
Or just add me to your MSN, I'm not such a bad, evil or EGG EGG EGG person (ahem), [email protected]
I appreciate your being able to apologise and would have to say that in all honesty, I would vote for Deano or Salevaa for notable.
They produce great original topics.
Not that they're the only ones, but they're the only ones that tell me about them
:-)
> You can vote for yourself cant you?
I dont think I have seen anyone do it
> though
I don't think so, but you could try.
I accept your apology with open doors, but unfortunately, I don't have any doors, or a bar, although I would like one in a few years time...
If you still think I stink then post a topic "DON'T VOTE FOR STINKY DAN2K1!"
Or just add me to your MSN, I'm not such a bad, evil or EGG EGG EGG person (ahem), [email protected]
I appreciate your being able to apologise and would have to say that in all honesty, I would vote for Deano or Salevaa for notable.
They produce great original topics.
Not that they're the only ones, but they're the only ones that tell me about them
:-)
You can vote for yourself cant you?
I dont think I have seen anyone do it though
I dont think I have seen anyone do it though
Yeah, I'm still going for Kid Rock or maybe Your Honour.
I didnt mean for things to get like that, now lets get this topic back on track
Dan2K1 wrote:
> CDouch wrote:
> Dan2K1 wrote:
> Would you stay on topic - what are you
> on about, these
> drawings?
trying to change the subject?
Erm, I think
> you'll find you did.
I will not tolerate you laying into me because you have
> mistaken me for someone else.
You think I have turned people against you for
> something that you have done, in regards to a Special Reserve Competition. I
> find this insulting and discriminating, and I have reported you to SR.
Bon
> Hypocryt'
Discriminating, where did you get that from?
I will explain all if you want:
SR ran an extra GAD comp called SR Towers. We had to draw what we think sr towers look like. My picture had people jumping off the side. A few weeks later, the september 11th incidant happened. this dav1d guy turned against me and was saying all this stuff about me and my picture. he then got overs to do the same even though I had drawn the picture before the 11th. After a while I couldnt take it any more, and entered again. Since then I must have got names confused, because I though it was you, not dav1d And im sorry for my mistake.
> CDouch wrote:
> Dan2K1 wrote:
> Would you stay on topic - what are you
> on about, these
> drawings?
trying to change the subject?
Erm, I think
> you'll find you did.
I will not tolerate you laying into me because you have
> mistaken me for someone else.
You think I have turned people against you for
> something that you have done, in regards to a Special Reserve Competition. I
> find this insulting and discriminating, and I have reported you to SR.
Bon
> Hypocryt'
Discriminating, where did you get that from?
I will explain all if you want:
SR ran an extra GAD comp called SR Towers. We had to draw what we think sr towers look like. My picture had people jumping off the side. A few weeks later, the september 11th incidant happened. this dav1d guy turned against me and was saying all this stuff about me and my picture. he then got overs to do the same even though I had drawn the picture before the 11th. After a while I couldnt take it any more, and entered again. Since then I must have got names confused, because I though it was you, not dav1d And im sorry for my mistake.
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> I want to know who all those newbies were who appeared, voted for Dringo and
> sodded off again!
--
No-one voted for Dringo! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA =p
> I want to know who all those newbies were who appeared, voted for Dringo and
> sodded off again!
--
No-one voted for Dringo! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA =p
CDouch wrote:
> I looked and it turns out I was wrong. it was Dav1d, sorry!
it was a long time
> ago, and your name is kinda quite simular, sort of.
So sorry about that, but
> I still think you are annoying after that egg thing.
Annoying. One topic. One topic that causes no one harm, and you go and do all this.
I would urge you not to vote for me anyway, I'm barely on these forums in comparison to other people who may or may not have nothing else to do with their lives, and ultimately of course I do not deserve to be voted NOTABLE.
I also do not deserve the abuse that has swung may way because of people not getting their facts right.
I accept your apology, but ask in future that you be more careful when accusing people of such misjustices.
Leave me be, take back your abuse if you so wish, it means nothing to me.
Good night.
> I looked and it turns out I was wrong. it was Dav1d, sorry!
it was a long time
> ago, and your name is kinda quite simular, sort of.
So sorry about that, but
> I still think you are annoying after that egg thing.
Annoying. One topic. One topic that causes no one harm, and you go and do all this.
I would urge you not to vote for me anyway, I'm barely on these forums in comparison to other people who may or may not have nothing else to do with their lives, and ultimately of course I do not deserve to be voted NOTABLE.
I also do not deserve the abuse that has swung may way because of people not getting their facts right.
I accept your apology, but ask in future that you be more careful when accusing people of such misjustices.
Leave me be, take back your abuse if you so wish, it means nothing to me.
Good night.
Stryke wrote:
> This has got a bit personal, wouldn't you agree? Now let's all shake hands and
> turn this thread over to a U.N peacekeeping team. :-D
"He started it!"
Now, I will apologise for writing a toic entitled "Egg" With the singing of lalala inside, I am terribly sorry, but I didn't realise that this could cause such offence to anyone.
However, I will not back down when someone accuses me of 'turning' people against someone, when I have no recollection of the event, funny that seeing as I wasn't the person who did this.
Mange tout
> This has got a bit personal, wouldn't you agree? Now let's all shake hands and
> turn this thread over to a U.N peacekeeping team. :-D
"He started it!"
Now, I will apologise for writing a toic entitled "Egg" With the singing of lalala inside, I am terribly sorry, but I didn't realise that this could cause such offence to anyone.
However, I will not back down when someone accuses me of 'turning' people against someone, when I have no recollection of the event, funny that seeing as I wasn't the person who did this.
Mange tout
I want to know who all those newbies were who appeared, voted for Dringo and sodded off again!
Page: