The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Good morning children,
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Page:
*Homer Simpson voice*
Heh Heh, we can *all* have gold stars.
Heh Heh, we can *all* have gold stars.
Salevaa wrote:
I did it - can I have a gold star?
> Please Grix? I want a gold star!!!
--
Almost, but you will notice that the person writing this post was Goatboy. Not Grix. Easy to get confused, both names start with G..
I did it - can I have a gold star?
> Please Grix? I want a gold star!!!
--
Almost, but you will notice that the person writing this post was Goatboy. Not Grix. Easy to get confused, both names start with G..
Goatboy wrote:
> Slik demonstrates the correct usage of "Reply using quote".
Slik gets a gold star.
I did it - can I have a gold star? Please Grix? I want a gold star!!!
::Stamps feet up and down and runs to the corner to sulk::
> Slik demonstrates the correct usage of "Reply using quote".
Slik gets a gold star.
I did it - can I have a gold star? Please Grix? I want a gold star!!!
::Stamps feet up and down and runs to the corner to sulk::
Goatboy wrote:
Slik gets a gold star.
ooh! shiny!...
slik ~_~
Slik gets a gold star.
ooh! shiny!...
slik ~_~
Slik demonstrates the correct usage of "Reply using quote".
Take note of the deletion of the majority of the original post, leaving only the parts relevant to his response.
Slik gets a gold star.
Take note of the deletion of the majority of the original post, leaving only the parts relevant to his response.
Slik gets a gold star.
Goatboy wrote:
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for
> comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Can't w8! lol
slik ~_~
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for
> comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Can't w8! lol
slik ~_~
Good morning children,
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Page: