The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Good morning children,
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
Page:
Ice Blaster wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
Quoting an entire post and merely adding
>
> "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of
>
> mitten-wearers.
----
I rest my case.
> Goatboy wrote:
Quoting an entire post and merely adding
>
> "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of
>
> mitten-wearers.
----
I rest my case.
Salevaa wrote:
Nooo! I
> want the gold star!
::Stamps feet again::
Silly me LoL!
yes silly you... the gold stars are mine i tell you mine, all mine mwahahahahahaha!
slik ~_~
Nooo! I
> want the gold star!
::Stamps feet again::
Silly me LoL!
yes silly you... the gold stars are mine i tell you mine, all mine mwahahahahahaha!
slik ~_~
Stryke wrote:
> Salevaa almost got it againm but you would delete the part that you wrote,
> leaving only my comment, because it is my comment you are remarking on and not
> your desire for a gold star. Try again.
Nooo! I want the gold star!
::Stamps feet again::
Silly me LoL!
> Salevaa almost got it againm but you would delete the part that you wrote,
> leaving only my comment, because it is my comment you are remarking on and not
> your desire for a gold star. Try again.
Nooo! I want the gold star!
::Stamps feet again::
Silly me LoL!
Heh heh.....teacher isn't very nice.....
mesa mug him for gold star!
mesa mug him for gold star!
Stryke wrote:
because it is my comment you are remarking on and not
> your desire for a gold star. Try again.
gold star...
slik ~_~
because it is my comment you are remarking on and not
> your desire for a gold star. Try again.
gold star...
slik ~_~
Salevaa almost got it againm but you would delete the part that you wrote, leaving only my comment, because it is my comment you are remarking on and not your desire for a gold star. Try again.
Ice Blaster wrote:
> How D'i do sir?
I'm sure goatboy would be proud of you... *sniggers whilst looking at shiny gold star!*
slik ~_~
> How D'i do sir?
I'm sure goatboy would be proud of you... *sniggers whilst looking at shiny gold star!*
slik ~_~
Stryke wrote:
> Salevaa wrote:
I did it - can I have a gold star?
> Please Grix? I want a
> gold star!!!
--
Almost, but you will notice that the person writing this
> post was Goatboy. Not Grix. Easy to get confused, both names start with G..
Meh - the other day I thought Rasta was Grix!
> Salevaa wrote:
I did it - can I have a gold star?
> Please Grix? I want a
> gold star!!!
--
Almost, but you will notice that the person writing this
> post was Goatboy. Not Grix. Easy to get confused, both names start with G..
Meh - the other day I thought Rasta was Grix!
How D'i do sir?
Goatboy wrote:
> Good morning children,
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the
> "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how
> to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines
> of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It
> is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the
> eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy
> paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding
> "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of
> mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for
> comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
YES
> Good morning children,
Today's lessson is a very important one.
Using the
> "reply using quote" function is a good thing. But you must learn how
> to use it correctly, otherwise you create massive posts with maybe 1 or 2 lines
> of your own at the bottom.
This looks messy and marks you out as a fool.
It
> is common sense to "reply using quote", but it's so much easier on the
> eye if you delete the parts of the post not relevant.
It creates a puncy
> paragraph with information.
Quoting an entire post and merely adding
> "Yes" at the bottom is pointless and the domain of
> mitten-wearers.
Tomorrow's lesson will be
"Realising some posts are for
> comedic effect only and not to be taken seriously."
YES
Page: