The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
..so here it is.
Hello all my computer is all nice and fixed now so i'm back to posting here again.
Hmmmm I need to turn this topic into something interesting.
Aha!
Lets talk about all the conspiracy in the WWF, now I could blab on four hours about it but i'm not going to so i'll give you some more recent examples.
As you all know each story writer or 'big man' in the WWF has their favourite wrestler and it goes something like this..
Stone Cold - Vince Mcahon and JR
The Rock - Pat Patterson
Big Show and Test - Shane Mcmahon
Triple H - Stephanie Mchmaon
Michael P.S Hayes - The Hardys
All the Divas - The King ;-)
Rob Van Dam and Rhyno - Paul Heyman
And I think Gerald Brisco favours the Undertaker but i'm not too sure about that.
There are others but I can't remember them just now but this will do.
Notice how no one favours Kane?
Would this be the reasoning why he has only ever held the WWF title once and even then was only for 24 hours?
Of course it is.
This is probably also the reason why Stone Cold gets all the top storylines two of the biggest bookers in the WWF favour him, that's why the crowd cheer him so much he gets to beat up Mcmahon and they love that.
Also Paul Heyman dislikes Tazz (maybe it was because of the way he left ECW?) and has tried to put him down, this would explain his lack of a push.
Personally I don't think it's fair for this because top athletes like say Essa Rios never get a decent chance at the big time.
I suppose it's all about playing a good character at first, remember The Rocks quick rise through the WWF? I'd say that was because of not only him being a good wrestler he played a great character.
One last thing, the Undertaker has been in the WWF for 11 years and has only held the title belt twice I think, wheras the Rock has held it many times, 6 time if I remember correctly, fair enough he didn't have it for as long as some when he did hold it unlke Austin who wins at Wresltemania every year and nearly every ppv and holds the belt for more than 6 months at a time. It just shows it pays to know people in the right places.
CONSPIRACY.
:-)
I'll contribute to this more when I have time but for now i'm off out.
Starlight
Hello all my computer is all nice and fixed now so i'm back to posting here again.
Hmmmm I need to turn this topic into something interesting.
Aha!
Lets talk about all the conspiracy in the WWF, now I could blab on four hours about it but i'm not going to so i'll give you some more recent examples.
As you all know each story writer or 'big man' in the WWF has their favourite wrestler and it goes something like this..
Stone Cold - Vince Mcahon and JR
The Rock - Pat Patterson
Big Show and Test - Shane Mcmahon
Triple H - Stephanie Mchmaon
Michael P.S Hayes - The Hardys
All the Divas - The King ;-)
Rob Van Dam and Rhyno - Paul Heyman
And I think Gerald Brisco favours the Undertaker but i'm not too sure about that.
There are others but I can't remember them just now but this will do.
Notice how no one favours Kane?
Would this be the reasoning why he has only ever held the WWF title once and even then was only for 24 hours?
Of course it is.
This is probably also the reason why Stone Cold gets all the top storylines two of the biggest bookers in the WWF favour him, that's why the crowd cheer him so much he gets to beat up Mcmahon and they love that.
Also Paul Heyman dislikes Tazz (maybe it was because of the way he left ECW?) and has tried to put him down, this would explain his lack of a push.
Personally I don't think it's fair for this because top athletes like say Essa Rios never get a decent chance at the big time.
I suppose it's all about playing a good character at first, remember The Rocks quick rise through the WWF? I'd say that was because of not only him being a good wrestler he played a great character.
One last thing, the Undertaker has been in the WWF for 11 years and has only held the title belt twice I think, wheras the Rock has held it many times, 6 time if I remember correctly, fair enough he didn't have it for as long as some when he did hold it unlke Austin who wins at Wresltemania every year and nearly every ppv and holds the belt for more than 6 months at a time. It just shows it pays to know people in the right places.
CONSPIRACY.
:-)
I'll contribute to this more when I have time but for now i'm off out.
Starlight
Page:
In my opinion the Undertaker is only built on character, he dosn't sell moves very well and is slow at putting on a show which is what this is.
I never really thought the "Bad Ass" (He wishes) deserved the title.
Pat Paterson favours The Rock ........ meh!
I'm glad Taker only held the belt twice. Shows that being evil doesn't pay off.
..so here it is.
Hello all my computer is all nice and fixed now so i'm back to posting here again.
Hmmmm I need to turn this topic into something interesting.
Aha!
Lets talk about all the conspiracy in the WWF, now I could blab on four hours about it but i'm not going to so i'll give you some more recent examples.
As you all know each story writer or 'big man' in the WWF has their favourite wrestler and it goes something like this..
Stone Cold - Vince Mcahon and JR
The Rock - Pat Patterson
Big Show and Test - Shane Mcmahon
Triple H - Stephanie Mchmaon
Michael P.S Hayes - The Hardys
All the Divas - The King ;-)
Rob Van Dam and Rhyno - Paul Heyman
And I think Gerald Brisco favours the Undertaker but i'm not too sure about that.
There are others but I can't remember them just now but this will do.
Notice how no one favours Kane?
Would this be the reasoning why he has only ever held the WWF title once and even then was only for 24 hours?
Of course it is.
This is probably also the reason why Stone Cold gets all the top storylines two of the biggest bookers in the WWF favour him, that's why the crowd cheer him so much he gets to beat up Mcmahon and they love that.
Also Paul Heyman dislikes Tazz (maybe it was because of the way he left ECW?) and has tried to put him down, this would explain his lack of a push.
Personally I don't think it's fair for this because top athletes like say Essa Rios never get a decent chance at the big time.
I suppose it's all about playing a good character at first, remember The Rocks quick rise through the WWF? I'd say that was because of not only him being a good wrestler he played a great character.
One last thing, the Undertaker has been in the WWF for 11 years and has only held the title belt twice I think, wheras the Rock has held it many times, 6 time if I remember correctly, fair enough he didn't have it for as long as some when he did hold it unlke Austin who wins at Wresltemania every year and nearly every ppv and holds the belt for more than 6 months at a time. It just shows it pays to know people in the right places.
CONSPIRACY.
:-)
I'll contribute to this more when I have time but for now i'm off out.
Starlight
Hello all my computer is all nice and fixed now so i'm back to posting here again.
Hmmmm I need to turn this topic into something interesting.
Aha!
Lets talk about all the conspiracy in the WWF, now I could blab on four hours about it but i'm not going to so i'll give you some more recent examples.
As you all know each story writer or 'big man' in the WWF has their favourite wrestler and it goes something like this..
Stone Cold - Vince Mcahon and JR
The Rock - Pat Patterson
Big Show and Test - Shane Mcmahon
Triple H - Stephanie Mchmaon
Michael P.S Hayes - The Hardys
All the Divas - The King ;-)
Rob Van Dam and Rhyno - Paul Heyman
And I think Gerald Brisco favours the Undertaker but i'm not too sure about that.
There are others but I can't remember them just now but this will do.
Notice how no one favours Kane?
Would this be the reasoning why he has only ever held the WWF title once and even then was only for 24 hours?
Of course it is.
This is probably also the reason why Stone Cold gets all the top storylines two of the biggest bookers in the WWF favour him, that's why the crowd cheer him so much he gets to beat up Mcmahon and they love that.
Also Paul Heyman dislikes Tazz (maybe it was because of the way he left ECW?) and has tried to put him down, this would explain his lack of a push.
Personally I don't think it's fair for this because top athletes like say Essa Rios never get a decent chance at the big time.
I suppose it's all about playing a good character at first, remember The Rocks quick rise through the WWF? I'd say that was because of not only him being a good wrestler he played a great character.
One last thing, the Undertaker has been in the WWF for 11 years and has only held the title belt twice I think, wheras the Rock has held it many times, 6 time if I remember correctly, fair enough he didn't have it for as long as some when he did hold it unlke Austin who wins at Wresltemania every year and nearly every ppv and holds the belt for more than 6 months at a time. It just shows it pays to know people in the right places.
CONSPIRACY.
:-)
I'll contribute to this more when I have time but for now i'm off out.
Starlight
Page: