The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
..so here it is.
Hello all my computer is all nice and fixed now so i'm back to posting here again.
Hmmmm I need to turn this topic into something interesting.
Aha!
Lets talk about all the conspiracy in the WWF, now I could blab on four hours about it but i'm not going to so i'll give you some more recent examples.
As you all know each story writer or 'big man' in the WWF has their favourite wrestler and it goes something like this..
Stone Cold - Vince Mcahon and JR
The Rock - Pat Patterson
Big Show and Test - Shane Mcmahon
Triple H - Stephanie Mchmaon
Michael P.S Hayes - The Hardys
All the Divas - The King ;-)
Rob Van Dam and Rhyno - Paul Heyman
And I think Gerald Brisco favours the Undertaker but i'm not too sure about that.
There are others but I can't remember them just now but this will do.
Notice how no one favours Kane?
Would this be the reasoning why he has only ever held the WWF title once and even then was only for 24 hours?
Of course it is.
This is probably also the reason why Stone Cold gets all the top storylines two of the biggest bookers in the WWF favour him, that's why the crowd cheer him so much he gets to beat up Mcmahon and they love that.
Also Paul Heyman dislikes Tazz (maybe it was because of the way he left ECW?) and has tried to put him down, this would explain his lack of a push.
Personally I don't think it's fair for this because top athletes like say Essa Rios never get a decent chance at the big time.
I suppose it's all about playing a good character at first, remember The Rocks quick rise through the WWF? I'd say that was because of not only him being a good wrestler he played a great character.
One last thing, the Undertaker has been in the WWF for 11 years and has only held the title belt twice I think, wheras the Rock has held it many times, 6 time if I remember correctly, fair enough he didn't have it for as long as some when he did hold it unlke Austin who wins at Wresltemania every year and nearly every ppv and holds the belt for more than 6 months at a time. It just shows it pays to know people in the right places.
CONSPIRACY.
:-)
I'll contribute to this more when I have time but for now i'm off out.
Starlight
Hello all my computer is all nice and fixed now so i'm back to posting here again.
Hmmmm I need to turn this topic into something interesting.
Aha!
Lets talk about all the conspiracy in the WWF, now I could blab on four hours about it but i'm not going to so i'll give you some more recent examples.
As you all know each story writer or 'big man' in the WWF has their favourite wrestler and it goes something like this..
Stone Cold - Vince Mcahon and JR
The Rock - Pat Patterson
Big Show and Test - Shane Mcmahon
Triple H - Stephanie Mchmaon
Michael P.S Hayes - The Hardys
All the Divas - The King ;-)
Rob Van Dam and Rhyno - Paul Heyman
And I think Gerald Brisco favours the Undertaker but i'm not too sure about that.
There are others but I can't remember them just now but this will do.
Notice how no one favours Kane?
Would this be the reasoning why he has only ever held the WWF title once and even then was only for 24 hours?
Of course it is.
This is probably also the reason why Stone Cold gets all the top storylines two of the biggest bookers in the WWF favour him, that's why the crowd cheer him so much he gets to beat up Mcmahon and they love that.
Also Paul Heyman dislikes Tazz (maybe it was because of the way he left ECW?) and has tried to put him down, this would explain his lack of a push.
Personally I don't think it's fair for this because top athletes like say Essa Rios never get a decent chance at the big time.
I suppose it's all about playing a good character at first, remember The Rocks quick rise through the WWF? I'd say that was because of not only him being a good wrestler he played a great character.
One last thing, the Undertaker has been in the WWF for 11 years and has only held the title belt twice I think, wheras the Rock has held it many times, 6 time if I remember correctly, fair enough he didn't have it for as long as some when he did hold it unlke Austin who wins at Wresltemania every year and nearly every ppv and holds the belt for more than 6 months at a time. It just shows it pays to know people in the right places.
CONSPIRACY.
:-)
I'll contribute to this more when I have time but for now i'm off out.
Starlight
Page:
The Rock could beat Stone Cold, Kurt Angle, Jericho, RVD or Undertaker, he just isn't getting very many matches that are of importance right now.
Ice Blaster wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> I'm glad Taker only held the belt twice. Shows that being evil
> doesn't pay off.
>I disagree, Taker used to be great!!
Yes, well you only think that because you're an illiterate Cockroach.
> Ant wrote:
> I'm glad Taker only held the belt twice. Shows that being evil
> doesn't pay off.
>I disagree, Taker used to be great!!
Yes, well you only think that because you're an illiterate Cockroach.
They don't seem to be utilising the Rock like they used to.
If you havn't seen Smackdown then this could be a SPOILER, nothing big mind but there you go. I'm not even sure if this is announced on Smackdown I just read it off a site.
Right I think this sucks.
The Rock is going to go one on one with Y2J at the Rumble for the undisputed title.
Good?
No.
If the Rock wins that means that more than likely he will go to Wrestlemania as champion and more than likely loose the title there.
The Rock never wins at Wrestlemania, i'm not moaning but I would rather him get the other route of forcing and behind kicking his way to main event WM18 and be much more of a dominant, stronger character like Austin was.
Think about what i'm saying here, how fan favourites usually get to WM, they never go in as champs.
I hope the Rock looses at the Rumble, a screwjob or something maybe and then go on a rampage like he used to and become the popular a** whupping Rock.
Right I think this sucks.
The Rock is going to go one on one with Y2J at the Rumble for the undisputed title.
Good?
No.
If the Rock wins that means that more than likely he will go to Wrestlemania as champion and more than likely loose the title there.
The Rock never wins at Wrestlemania, i'm not moaning but I would rather him get the other route of forcing and behind kicking his way to main event WM18 and be much more of a dominant, stronger character like Austin was.
Think about what i'm saying here, how fan favourites usually get to WM, they never go in as champs.
I hope the Rock looses at the Rumble, a screwjob or something maybe and then go on a rampage like he used to and become the popular a** whupping Rock.
Grandprix wrote:
> Alien invasion, bio-duplication, nude conspiracies. We all know that it's all to
> do with the Indians.
CONSPIRACY! FIGHT THE SYSTEM!
Yup, im fine too!!!
> Alien invasion, bio-duplication, nude conspiracies. We all know that it's all to
> do with the Indians.
CONSPIRACY! FIGHT THE SYSTEM!
Yup, im fine too!!!
Alien invasion, bio-duplication, nude conspiracies. We all know that it's all to do with the Indians.
CONSPIRACY! FIGHT THE SYSTEM!
CONSPIRACY! FIGHT THE SYSTEM!
Yeah the 'old' Undertaker was a good interesting character at least.
Old School indeed.
Old School indeed.
exactly, he USED to be great.
Ant wrote:
> I'm glad Taker only held the belt twice. Shows that being evil doesn't pay off.
I disagree, Taker used to be great!!
> I'm glad Taker only held the belt twice. Shows that being evil doesn't pay off.
I disagree, Taker used to be great!!
Damn straight!
Page: