The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Im starting off by saying: Zelda is an RPG and it is also an Adventure/Action game.
Let the arguing Begin!
And if i remember correctly, which i do, you made quite the scene out of it.
HAHAHA, you are a fool
> The Adventure genre is a hybrid of RPG, Action and to a lesser extent,
> Platforming. Therefore by saying it’s a bit of Adventure and some RPG
> elements would be saying it was:
>
> (Adventure + RPG) + RPG, which would give you a game comprised of
> Adventure + RPG + RPG[squared]
>
> Which it blatantly isn’t, given that it has minimal RPG-ness about it.
>
>
> Ergo, it’s an Adventure.
There are hundreds of genres, Platformers, Adventures, real time RPG's, turn based RPG's, Platformers, Real time stratagys, football games, Basketball, survival horrors, fun racers, realistic racers, futuristic racrers, first person shooters, Extreme sports, third person shooters... etc... etc...
All of these are what I like to call sub-genres, they all fit under certain larger catagories:
Shooting games, Sport games, racing games, role play games, stratagy games.
Adventure and platform games come under RPG.
That's how I see it.
Then compare it to Zelda and see if it has most of these qualities.
The Adventure genre is a hybrid of RPG, Action and to a lesser extent, Platforming. Therefore by saying it’s a bit of Adventure and some RPG elements would be saying it was:
(Adventure + RPG) + RPG, which would give you a game comprised of Adventure + RPG + RPG[squared]
Which it blatantly isn’t, given that it has minimal RPG-ness about it.
Ergo, it’s an Adventure.
1) Does it really matter anyway?
2) NGC or NOM will tell you.
3) I'm bored of this now.
Im starting off by saying: Zelda is an RPG and it is also an Adventure/Action game.
Let the arguing Begin!